Promoting or inhibiting? Unraveling the nonlinear and spatially heterogeneous effects of land use efficiency on ecological resilience: Evidence from the Taihang Mountains Region, China

IF 8.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Habitat International Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2026.103779
Yanlong Niu, Yi Wang
{"title":"Promoting or inhibiting? Unraveling the nonlinear and spatially heterogeneous effects of land use efficiency on ecological resilience: Evidence from the Taihang Mountains Region, China","authors":"Yanlong Niu,&nbsp;Yi Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2026.103779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological resilience is fundamental to sustainable urban development, yet how land use efficiency affects ecological resilience remains insufficiently understood. Prior research has rarely accounted for the nonlinear dynamics and spatial heterogeneity embedded in ecological resilience response mechanisms. To address these gaps, this study develops a geospatial explainable artificial intelligence framework that integrates CatBoost, SHAP, and GeoShapley, applying it to 22 cities in the Taihang Mountains Region. Ecological resilience is assessed through the “Scale–Density–Morphology” dimensions. Findings reveal a spatial gradient of “high in the central–north and low in the southeast,” with an overall decline from 2000 to 2020, most pronounced in rapidly urbanizing cities. The CatBoost model achieved strong predictive accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.953). COHESION and population efficiency were identified as dominant associated factors, while introducing spatial location enhanced the explanatory power of land use efficiency variables. Nonlinear and spatially heterogeneous responses were evident: GDP efficiency was positively associated with ecological resilience within an moderate range (approximately 0.2–0.9), while exhibiting a U-shaped tendency at higher values. K-means clustering distinguished three mechanism patterns, providing the basis for differentiated policy pathways. These insights underscore that land use efficiency and landscape configuration are closely associated with ecological resilience, and demonstrate the potential of the geospatial explainable artificial intelligence framework to support spatial planning, land governance, and targeted regional development strategies toward sustainable urban futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 103779"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397526000718","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological resilience is fundamental to sustainable urban development, yet how land use efficiency affects ecological resilience remains insufficiently understood. Prior research has rarely accounted for the nonlinear dynamics and spatial heterogeneity embedded in ecological resilience response mechanisms. To address these gaps, this study develops a geospatial explainable artificial intelligence framework that integrates CatBoost, SHAP, and GeoShapley, applying it to 22 cities in the Taihang Mountains Region. Ecological resilience is assessed through the “Scale–Density–Morphology” dimensions. Findings reveal a spatial gradient of “high in the central–north and low in the southeast,” with an overall decline from 2000 to 2020, most pronounced in rapidly urbanizing cities. The CatBoost model achieved strong predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.953). COHESION and population efficiency were identified as dominant associated factors, while introducing spatial location enhanced the explanatory power of land use efficiency variables. Nonlinear and spatially heterogeneous responses were evident: GDP efficiency was positively associated with ecological resilience within an moderate range (approximately 0.2–0.9), while exhibiting a U-shaped tendency at higher values. K-means clustering distinguished three mechanism patterns, providing the basis for differentiated policy pathways. These insights underscore that land use efficiency and landscape configuration are closely associated with ecological resilience, and demonstrate the potential of the geospatial explainable artificial intelligence framework to support spatial planning, land governance, and targeted regional development strategies toward sustainable urban futures.

Abstract Image

促进还是抑制?土地利用效率对生态恢复力的非线性和空间异质性影响:来自太行山区的证据
生态弹性是城市可持续发展的基础,但土地利用效率对生态弹性的影响尚不清楚。以往的研究很少考虑到生态弹性响应机制的非线性动力学和空间异质性。为了解决这些差距,本研究开发了一个地理空间可解释的人工智能框架,该框架集成了CatBoost、SHAP和GeoShapley,并将其应用于太行山区的22个城市。生态恢复力通过“尺度-密度-形态”维度进行评估。研究结果显示,从2000年到2020年,总体上呈“中北部高,东南部低”的空间梯度,在快速城市化的城市中下降最为明显。CatBoost模型具有较强的预测精度(R2 = 0.953)。凝聚力和人口效率是主要的相关因子,而空间区位的引入增强了土地利用效率变量的解释力。在中等范围内(约0.2 ~ 0.9),GDP效率与生态恢复力呈显著正相关,在较高范围内呈u型趋势。K-means聚类区分了三种机制模式,为区分政策路径提供了依据。这些见解强调了土地利用效率和景观配置与生态弹性密切相关,并展示了地理空间可解释的人工智能框架在支持空间规划、土地治理和有针对性的区域发展战略以实现可持续城市未来方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书