Specific fine-tuned GPT-enhanced medical imaging diagnosis recommendations

IF 7.8 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Intelligent medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.imed.2025.03.005
Zhixiang Wang , Jia Li , Jing Sun , Xinghao Wang , Pengling Ren , Linkun Cai , Zhenchang Wang , Han Lyu
{"title":"Specific fine-tuned GPT-enhanced medical imaging diagnosis recommendations","authors":"Zhixiang Wang ,&nbsp;Jia Li ,&nbsp;Jing Sun ,&nbsp;Xinghao Wang ,&nbsp;Pengling Ren ,&nbsp;Linkun Cai ,&nbsp;Zhenchang Wang ,&nbsp;Han Lyu","doi":"10.1016/j.imed.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Overutilization of medical imaging is a significant problem in healthcare, contributing to wasted resources and potentially causing harm to patients. Despite educational efforts and tools, appropriate imaging adoption remains challenging. To address this, we aimed to train an AI model, termed the Appropriate Medical Imaging Recommendations Generative Pre-trained Transformer (AMIR-GPT), to provide precise recommendations for medical imaging, thereby advancing value-based healthcare.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective study used a dataset comprising 1036 paired questions and answers, collected from 26 guidelines in the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACR AC). The dataset, covering common clinical scenarios, was divided into a training set (932 entries) and a test set (104 entries). The OpenAI text-davinci model based on GPT-3 was fine-tuned in four iterations using the training set. The performance of AMIR-GPT was compared to GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 on the test set. Response similarity to standard answers was scored from 1 to 5 using a weighted Cohen’s kappa to measure inter-rater reliability between the model-generated responses and expert reviewers. Statistical significance was assessed using a chi-square test to compare categorical performance metrics across the models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AMIR-GPT achieved the highest perfect score rate (33.33%), outperforming GPT-4, Gemini, and GPT-3.5. In the high match category, GPT-3.5 led with 25%, while Gemini excelled in the medium match category at 37.5%. ANOVA confirmed significant differences among models (<em>f</em> = 6.49, <em>P</em> = 0.0004). Notable pairwise results included significant differences between AMIR-GPT and GPT-3.5 (<em>P</em> = 0.018) and between GPT-3.5 and Gemini (<em>P</em> = 0.000), indicating varied model performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Fine-tuning GPT models for specific medical domains enhances their ability to provide accurate imaging recommendations. However, further validation is needed to confirm the broader applicability of these findings in various clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73400,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667102625001093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Overutilization of medical imaging is a significant problem in healthcare, contributing to wasted resources and potentially causing harm to patients. Despite educational efforts and tools, appropriate imaging adoption remains challenging. To address this, we aimed to train an AI model, termed the Appropriate Medical Imaging Recommendations Generative Pre-trained Transformer (AMIR-GPT), to provide precise recommendations for medical imaging, thereby advancing value-based healthcare.

Methods

This prospective study used a dataset comprising 1036 paired questions and answers, collected from 26 guidelines in the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACR AC). The dataset, covering common clinical scenarios, was divided into a training set (932 entries) and a test set (104 entries). The OpenAI text-davinci model based on GPT-3 was fine-tuned in four iterations using the training set. The performance of AMIR-GPT was compared to GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 on the test set. Response similarity to standard answers was scored from 1 to 5 using a weighted Cohen’s kappa to measure inter-rater reliability between the model-generated responses and expert reviewers. Statistical significance was assessed using a chi-square test to compare categorical performance metrics across the models.

Results

AMIR-GPT achieved the highest perfect score rate (33.33%), outperforming GPT-4, Gemini, and GPT-3.5. In the high match category, GPT-3.5 led with 25%, while Gemini excelled in the medium match category at 37.5%. ANOVA confirmed significant differences among models (f = 6.49, P = 0.0004). Notable pairwise results included significant differences between AMIR-GPT and GPT-3.5 (P = 0.018) and between GPT-3.5 and Gemini (P = 0.000), indicating varied model performance.

Conclusion

Fine-tuning GPT models for specific medical domains enhances their ability to provide accurate imaging recommendations. However, further validation is needed to confirm the broader applicability of these findings in various clinical settings.
特定的微调gpt增强医学成像诊断建议
医学影像的过度利用是医疗保健中的一个重要问题,它会造成资源浪费,并可能对患者造成伤害。尽管教育努力和工具,适当的成像采用仍然具有挑战性。为了解决这个问题,我们的目标是训练一个人工智能模型,称为适当的医学成像建议生成预训练转换器(AMIR-GPT),为医学成像提供精确的建议,从而推进基于价值的医疗保健。方法本前瞻性研究使用了包含1036个配对问题和答案的数据集,收集自美国放射学会适当性标准(ACR AC)的26条指南。该数据集涵盖了常见的临床场景,分为训练集(932个条目)和测试集(104个条目)。使用训练集对基于GPT-3的OpenAI文本-达芬奇模型进行了四次迭代微调。将AMIR-GPT与GPT-4和GPT-3.5在测试集上的性能进行比较。回答与标准答案的相似度从1到5分,使用加权的科恩kappa来衡量模型生成的回答与专家审稿人之间的评级可靠性。使用卡方检验来比较各模型的分类性能指标,以评估统计显著性。结果samir - gpt完好率最高(33.33%),优于GPT-4、Gemini和GPT-3.5。在高匹配类别中,GPT-3.5以25%领先,而Gemini在中等匹配类别中表现出色,达到37.5%。方差分析证实各模型之间存在显著差异(f = 6.49, P = 0.0004)。显著的两两结果包括AMIR-GPT与GPT-3.5之间的显著差异(P = 0.018), GPT-3.5与Gemini之间的显著差异(P = 0.000),表明模型性能存在差异。结论对特定医学领域的GPT模型进行微调,可提高其提供准确影像学建议的能力。然而,需要进一步的验证来证实这些发现在各种临床环境中的更广泛适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligent medicine
Intelligent medicine Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书