{"title":"An environmental–sensorimotor cascade hypothesis: Spatial and mechanical affordances shape segmental trunk control in preterm infants","authors":"Weerasak Tapanya, Noppharath Sangkarit","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2026.111918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Preterm infants frequently display delayed postural control and segmental instability, yet the environmental mechanisms influencing this neuromechanical development remain poorly understood. Conventional views emphasize intrinsic neuromuscular immaturity, overlooking how daily environments constrain sensorimotor calibration. Drawing from longitudinal observations of moderate-to-late preterm infants, we propose an environmental–sensorimotor cascade hypothesis. This framework posits that spatial and mechanical affordance within infant home containers (e.g., playpens, cribs/cots, and other bounded spaces)—specifically <em>usable play area</em> and <em>surface compliance</em>—may modulate the quality and frequency of postural perturbations, thereby shaping the maturation of segmental trunk control. Limited spatial area restricts center-of-mass excursions and reduces opportunities for anticipatory and reactive adjustments, while excessively firm surfaces may impose lower demands on proprioceptive reweighting. Conversely, moderately compliant surfaces stimulate multi-segment coordination and feedforward stabilization. Over time, these constraints produce distinct trajectories of static, active, and reactive trunk control, influencing upright locomotor milestones. We hypothesize that such affordance-dependent calibration operates through adaptive tuning of trunk muscle synergies and sensory feedback gain. If confirmed, this hypothesis redefines the environment as an active biomechanical teacher, offering new targets for early intervention in preterm infants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 111918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987726000472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Preterm infants frequently display delayed postural control and segmental instability, yet the environmental mechanisms influencing this neuromechanical development remain poorly understood. Conventional views emphasize intrinsic neuromuscular immaturity, overlooking how daily environments constrain sensorimotor calibration. Drawing from longitudinal observations of moderate-to-late preterm infants, we propose an environmental–sensorimotor cascade hypothesis. This framework posits that spatial and mechanical affordance within infant home containers (e.g., playpens, cribs/cots, and other bounded spaces)—specifically usable play area and surface compliance—may modulate the quality and frequency of postural perturbations, thereby shaping the maturation of segmental trunk control. Limited spatial area restricts center-of-mass excursions and reduces opportunities for anticipatory and reactive adjustments, while excessively firm surfaces may impose lower demands on proprioceptive reweighting. Conversely, moderately compliant surfaces stimulate multi-segment coordination and feedforward stabilization. Over time, these constraints produce distinct trajectories of static, active, and reactive trunk control, influencing upright locomotor milestones. We hypothesize that such affordance-dependent calibration operates through adaptive tuning of trunk muscle synergies and sensory feedback gain. If confirmed, this hypothesis redefines the environment as an active biomechanical teacher, offering new targets for early intervention in preterm infants.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.