{"title":"Temporal coding instability in tinnitus: The temporal jitter hypothesis","authors":"Halime Sümeyra Sevmez","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2026.111913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite decades of investigation, the pathophysiological basis of tinnitus remains incompletely understood. Prevailing models have largely emphasized peripheral deafferentation, central hyperactivity, maladaptive plasticity, aberrant neural synchrony, and deficits in sensory gating. While these frameworks account for selected features of tinnitus, they do not fully explain several persistent observations, including the heterogeneity of electrophysiological findings, the occurrence of tinnitus in individuals with clinically normal audiograms, and the frequently inconsistent associations between tinnitus and conventional neural amplitude or latency measures. Against this background, the Temporal Jitter Hypothesis is proposed as a complementary conceptual framework that identifies temporal auditory coding fidelity as a potentially underrecognized dimension of tinnitus pathophysiology, particularly within a mechanistically coherent subgroup of individuals characterized by preserved audiometric thresholds yet disrupted temporal processing. The hypothesis posits that increased variability in neural spike timing and reduced phase locking across the auditory pathway may give rise to temporally unstable neural representations even in the absence of overt threshold elevation. Such instability may subsequently interact with central gain and predictive processes, increasing the likelihood that internally generated auditory activity attains perceptual salience and persistence. Rather than constituting a universal explanation, this framework is intended to complement existing models by providing a constrained and empirically testable account of tinnitus within this specific physiological context. By shifting the explanatory emphasis from neural response magnitude toward temporal precision, the Temporal Jitter Hypothesis integrates behavioral, electrophysiological, and computational evidence while establishing a structured foundation for future experimental and translational research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 111913"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987726000423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite decades of investigation, the pathophysiological basis of tinnitus remains incompletely understood. Prevailing models have largely emphasized peripheral deafferentation, central hyperactivity, maladaptive plasticity, aberrant neural synchrony, and deficits in sensory gating. While these frameworks account for selected features of tinnitus, they do not fully explain several persistent observations, including the heterogeneity of electrophysiological findings, the occurrence of tinnitus in individuals with clinically normal audiograms, and the frequently inconsistent associations between tinnitus and conventional neural amplitude or latency measures. Against this background, the Temporal Jitter Hypothesis is proposed as a complementary conceptual framework that identifies temporal auditory coding fidelity as a potentially underrecognized dimension of tinnitus pathophysiology, particularly within a mechanistically coherent subgroup of individuals characterized by preserved audiometric thresholds yet disrupted temporal processing. The hypothesis posits that increased variability in neural spike timing and reduced phase locking across the auditory pathway may give rise to temporally unstable neural representations even in the absence of overt threshold elevation. Such instability may subsequently interact with central gain and predictive processes, increasing the likelihood that internally generated auditory activity attains perceptual salience and persistence. Rather than constituting a universal explanation, this framework is intended to complement existing models by providing a constrained and empirically testable account of tinnitus within this specific physiological context. By shifting the explanatory emphasis from neural response magnitude toward temporal precision, the Temporal Jitter Hypothesis integrates behavioral, electrophysiological, and computational evidence while establishing a structured foundation for future experimental and translational research.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.