Temporal coding instability in tinnitus: The temporal jitter hypothesis

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Medical hypotheses Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2026.111913
Halime Sümeyra Sevmez
{"title":"Temporal coding instability in tinnitus: The temporal jitter hypothesis","authors":"Halime Sümeyra Sevmez","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2026.111913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite decades of investigation, the pathophysiological basis of tinnitus remains incompletely understood. Prevailing models have largely emphasized peripheral deafferentation, central hyperactivity, maladaptive plasticity, aberrant neural synchrony, and deficits in sensory gating. While these frameworks account for selected features of tinnitus, they do not fully explain several persistent observations, including the heterogeneity of electrophysiological findings, the occurrence of tinnitus in individuals with clinically normal audiograms, and the frequently inconsistent associations between tinnitus and conventional neural amplitude or latency measures. Against this background, the Temporal Jitter Hypothesis is proposed as a complementary conceptual framework that identifies temporal auditory coding fidelity as a potentially underrecognized dimension of tinnitus pathophysiology, particularly within a mechanistically coherent subgroup of individuals characterized by preserved audiometric thresholds yet disrupted temporal processing. The hypothesis posits that increased variability in neural spike timing and reduced phase locking across the auditory pathway may give rise to temporally unstable neural representations even in the absence of overt threshold elevation. Such instability may subsequently interact with central gain and predictive processes, increasing the likelihood that internally generated auditory activity attains perceptual salience and persistence. Rather than constituting a universal explanation, this framework is intended to complement existing models by providing a constrained and empirically testable account of tinnitus within this specific physiological context. By shifting the explanatory emphasis from neural response magnitude toward temporal precision, the Temporal Jitter Hypothesis integrates behavioral, electrophysiological, and computational evidence while establishing a structured foundation for future experimental and translational research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 111913"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987726000423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite decades of investigation, the pathophysiological basis of tinnitus remains incompletely understood. Prevailing models have largely emphasized peripheral deafferentation, central hyperactivity, maladaptive plasticity, aberrant neural synchrony, and deficits in sensory gating. While these frameworks account for selected features of tinnitus, they do not fully explain several persistent observations, including the heterogeneity of electrophysiological findings, the occurrence of tinnitus in individuals with clinically normal audiograms, and the frequently inconsistent associations between tinnitus and conventional neural amplitude or latency measures. Against this background, the Temporal Jitter Hypothesis is proposed as a complementary conceptual framework that identifies temporal auditory coding fidelity as a potentially underrecognized dimension of tinnitus pathophysiology, particularly within a mechanistically coherent subgroup of individuals characterized by preserved audiometric thresholds yet disrupted temporal processing. The hypothesis posits that increased variability in neural spike timing and reduced phase locking across the auditory pathway may give rise to temporally unstable neural representations even in the absence of overt threshold elevation. Such instability may subsequently interact with central gain and predictive processes, increasing the likelihood that internally generated auditory activity attains perceptual salience and persistence. Rather than constituting a universal explanation, this framework is intended to complement existing models by providing a constrained and empirically testable account of tinnitus within this specific physiological context. By shifting the explanatory emphasis from neural response magnitude toward temporal precision, the Temporal Jitter Hypothesis integrates behavioral, electrophysiological, and computational evidence while establishing a structured foundation for future experimental and translational research.
耳鸣的时间编码不稳定性:时间抖动假说
尽管经过数十年的研究,耳鸣的病理生理基础仍然不完全清楚。主流模型主要强调外周神经传递障碍、中枢亢进、适应性不良可塑性、异常神经同步和感觉门控缺陷。虽然这些框架解释了耳鸣的特定特征,但它们并不能完全解释一些持续的观察结果,包括电生理结果的异质性,耳鸣在临床听音正常的个体中的发生,以及耳鸣与传统神经振幅或潜伏期测量之间经常不一致的关联。在此背景下,时间抖动假说被提出作为一个补充的概念框架,它确定了时间听觉编码保真度是耳鸣病理生理的一个潜在未被认识的维度,特别是在一个机制一致的个体亚群中,其特征是保留了听力阈值,但破坏了时间处理。该假设认为,即使在没有明显阈值升高的情况下,神经脉冲时间的变异性增加和听觉通路上相锁的减少也可能导致暂时不稳定的神经表征。这种不稳定性可能随后与中枢增益和预测过程相互作用,增加内部产生的听觉活动获得感知显著性和持久性的可能性。而不是构成一个普遍的解释,这个框架旨在补充现有的模型,提供一个限制和经验可测试的耳鸣在这种特定的生理背景下的解释。通过将解释重点从神经反应量级转向时间精度,时间抖动假说整合了行为、电生理和计算证据,同时为未来的实验和转化研究奠定了结构化的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical hypotheses
Medical hypotheses 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
167
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书