Nathan C. Nowalk MD , Juan C. Rojas MD , William F. Parker MD, PhD , Ashley Smith-Nunez MD , Sarah E. Gray MD, MPH , Ria Sood MPH , Devon O. Lewis BS , Stephanie Chia BS , Rajlakshmi Krishnamurthy MD , Valerie G. Press MD, MPH
{"title":"Impact of a COPD Bundled Payments for Care Innovation Program on Readmissions and Inpatient Care Quality","authors":"Nathan C. Nowalk MD , Juan C. Rojas MD , William F. Parker MD, PhD , Ashley Smith-Nunez MD , Sarah E. Gray MD, MPH , Ria Sood MPH , Devon O. Lewis BS , Stephanie Chia BS , Rajlakshmi Krishnamurthy MD , Valerie G. Press MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>One-fifth of US patients hospitalized for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) are readmitted within 30 days, contributing to high morbidity and costs. Medicare included COPD in their Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) in 2014 and offered voluntary value-based COPD care programs (Bundled Payments for Care Innovation [BPCI]).</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>Was our COPD HRRP effective in preventing hospital readmissions and improving inpatient care quality at our medical center?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study using Medicare data of BPCI-eligible hospitalizations for AECOPDs occurring pre-BPCI (October 2013-September 2014) and during BPCI (October 2015-September 2018) implementation. Our interprofessional COPD HRRP includes inpatient consultation and postdischarge interventions. We compared outcomes between BPCI program recipients and nonrecipients including inpatient COPD care quality metrics derived from international COPD guidelines and program-specific interventions using multivariable regressions. We evaluated 30- and 90-day all-cause readmission rates with multivariable logistic regression and 2-stage least squares instrumental variable analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 287 AECOPD hospitalizations (pre-BPCI: n = 57; BPCI: n = 230), 132 received the COPD HRRP. Patients were more likely to receive inhaler education (pre-BPCI: 12.0% vs BPCI: 71.8%; <em>P</em> < .01), tobacco cessation therapy (pre-BPCI: 24.3% vs BPCI: 71.8%; <em>P</em> < .01), and predischarge oxygen walk test (pre-BPCI: 49% vs BPCI: 81.0%; <em>P</em> < .01). In instrumental variable analysis, controlling for unobserved confounders correlated with receiving the COPD HRRP, our intervention was associated with a significantly lower adjusted 30-day all-cause readmission rate (pre-BPCI: 28.6% vs BPCI: 6.6%; <em>P</em> < .05; absolute decrease, −22.0%; 95% CI, −43.6 to −0.5) but not in 90-day readmissions.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The implementation of an evidence-based BPCI COPD program was associated with significant decrease in 30-day all-cause readmissions. Future studies are needed to assess individual interventions that may impact readmission reduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789225000868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
One-fifth of US patients hospitalized for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) are readmitted within 30 days, contributing to high morbidity and costs. Medicare included COPD in their Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) in 2014 and offered voluntary value-based COPD care programs (Bundled Payments for Care Innovation [BPCI]).
Research Question
Was our COPD HRRP effective in preventing hospital readmissions and improving inpatient care quality at our medical center?
Study Design and Methods
We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study using Medicare data of BPCI-eligible hospitalizations for AECOPDs occurring pre-BPCI (October 2013-September 2014) and during BPCI (October 2015-September 2018) implementation. Our interprofessional COPD HRRP includes inpatient consultation and postdischarge interventions. We compared outcomes between BPCI program recipients and nonrecipients including inpatient COPD care quality metrics derived from international COPD guidelines and program-specific interventions using multivariable regressions. We evaluated 30- and 90-day all-cause readmission rates with multivariable logistic regression and 2-stage least squares instrumental variable analysis.
Results
Of 287 AECOPD hospitalizations (pre-BPCI: n = 57; BPCI: n = 230), 132 received the COPD HRRP. Patients were more likely to receive inhaler education (pre-BPCI: 12.0% vs BPCI: 71.8%; P < .01), tobacco cessation therapy (pre-BPCI: 24.3% vs BPCI: 71.8%; P < .01), and predischarge oxygen walk test (pre-BPCI: 49% vs BPCI: 81.0%; P < .01). In instrumental variable analysis, controlling for unobserved confounders correlated with receiving the COPD HRRP, our intervention was associated with a significantly lower adjusted 30-day all-cause readmission rate (pre-BPCI: 28.6% vs BPCI: 6.6%; P < .05; absolute decrease, −22.0%; 95% CI, −43.6 to −0.5) but not in 90-day readmissions.
Interpretation
The implementation of an evidence-based BPCI COPD program was associated with significant decrease in 30-day all-cause readmissions. Future studies are needed to assess individual interventions that may impact readmission reduction.
研究背景:美国因慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重(AECOPDs)住院的患者中有五分之一在30天内再次入院,这导致了高发病率和高成本。2014年,医疗保险将慢性阻塞性肺病纳入其医院再入院减少计划(HRRP),并提供自愿的基于价值的慢性阻塞性肺病护理计划(护理创新捆绑支付[BPCI])。研究问题:我们的慢阻肺HRRP在预防再入院和提高我们医疗中心住院病人护理质量方面是否有效?研究设计和方法我们使用BPCI前(2013年10月- 2014年9月)和BPCI实施期间(2015年10月- 2018年9月)符合BPCI条件的aecopd住院患者的Medicare数据进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究。我们的跨专业COPD HRRP包括住院会诊和出院后干预。我们比较了BPCI计划接受者和非接受者的结果,包括来自国际COPD指南的住院COPD护理质量指标和使用多变量回归的特定计划干预措施。我们用多变量logistic回归和2阶段最小二乘工具变量分析评估了30天和90天的全因再入院率。结果287例AECOPD住院患者(BPCI前57例,BPCI后230例)中,132例接受了慢阻肺HRRP。患者更有可能接受吸入器教育(BPCI前:12.0% vs BPCI: 71.8%; P < 0.01)、戒烟治疗(BPCI前:24.3% vs BPCI: 71.8%; P < 0.01)和出院前氧步行试验(BPCI前:49% vs BPCI: 81.0%; P < 0.01)。在工具变量分析中,控制与接受慢阻肺HRRP相关的未观察到的混杂因素,我们的干预与调整后的30天全因再入院率显著降低相关(BPCI前:28.6% vs BPCI: 6.6%; P < 0.05;绝对下降,- 22.0%;95% CI, - 43.6至- 0.5),但与90天再入院率无关。基于证据的BPCI COPD计划的实施与30天全因再入院的显著减少相关。未来的研究需要评估可能影响再入院减少的个别干预措施。