Urban sprawl, natural environments, and mortality inequality: Socioeconomic pathways and spatial heterogeneity across U.S. counties

IF 7.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Applied Geography Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2026.103943
Yehua Dennis Wei , Yu Wang , David S. Curtis , Sungeun Shin , Ning Xiong
{"title":"Urban sprawl, natural environments, and mortality inequality: Socioeconomic pathways and spatial heterogeneity across U.S. counties","authors":"Yehua Dennis Wei ,&nbsp;Yu Wang ,&nbsp;David S. Curtis ,&nbsp;Sungeun Shin ,&nbsp;Ning Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2026.103943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mortality patterns exhibit substantial spatial variation, yet potential geographic influences are not well-understood. This study develops an integrated framework to investigate how urban sprawl and natural environments contribute to county-level all-cause mortality risk and to examine intergenerational mobility (IM) as a mediator. The analysis incorporates machine learning and spatial regression methods with U.S. county data. Using a small-area disease risk model, we identify clusters of high mortality risk in the Southeast while lower-risk counties concentrate along the Pacific Coast, the Northern Great Plains, and the Northeastern metropolitan corridor. Using random forest regression, poverty exerted the strongest influence, with an importance index of 0.38, far exceeding that of built and natural environment factors. Yet, when nonlinear relationships are considered, the built and natural environments are more clearly associated with mortality risk. Specifically, population centering, employment mix, land-use mix, and transportation accessibility are associated with lower mortality rates while higher population density corresponds to elevated risk, but only within specific ranges of each variable. Air pollution is consistently associated with higher mortality risk, whereas green space composition exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with mortality. In structural equation models, IM was a critical pathway linking urban sprawl characteristics to mortality outcomes, as population centering and land-use mix are associated with lower mortality through higher IM, while employment centering increases mortality by suppressing IM. Substantial spatial heterogeneity characterizes these relationships. The results highlight the need for regionally tailored interventions that integrate urban form, the natural environment, and opportunity structures to reduce mortality inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 103943"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622826000536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mortality patterns exhibit substantial spatial variation, yet potential geographic influences are not well-understood. This study develops an integrated framework to investigate how urban sprawl and natural environments contribute to county-level all-cause mortality risk and to examine intergenerational mobility (IM) as a mediator. The analysis incorporates machine learning and spatial regression methods with U.S. county data. Using a small-area disease risk model, we identify clusters of high mortality risk in the Southeast while lower-risk counties concentrate along the Pacific Coast, the Northern Great Plains, and the Northeastern metropolitan corridor. Using random forest regression, poverty exerted the strongest influence, with an importance index of 0.38, far exceeding that of built and natural environment factors. Yet, when nonlinear relationships are considered, the built and natural environments are more clearly associated with mortality risk. Specifically, population centering, employment mix, land-use mix, and transportation accessibility are associated with lower mortality rates while higher population density corresponds to elevated risk, but only within specific ranges of each variable. Air pollution is consistently associated with higher mortality risk, whereas green space composition exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with mortality. In structural equation models, IM was a critical pathway linking urban sprawl characteristics to mortality outcomes, as population centering and land-use mix are associated with lower mortality through higher IM, while employment centering increases mortality by suppressing IM. Substantial spatial heterogeneity characterizes these relationships. The results highlight the need for regionally tailored interventions that integrate urban form, the natural environment, and opportunity structures to reduce mortality inequalities.
城市扩张、自然环境和死亡率不平等:美国各县的社会经济路径和空间异质性
死亡率模式表现出很大的空间差异,但潜在的地理影响尚未得到很好的理解。本研究开发了一个综合框架来调查城市扩张和自然环境如何影响县级全因死亡率风险,并检验代际流动性(IM)作为中介。该分析将机器学习和空间回归方法与美国县数据结合起来。使用小区域疾病风险模型,我们确定了东南地区的高死亡率风险集群,而低风险县集中在太平洋沿岸,北部大平原和东北大都市走廊。利用随机森林回归分析,贫困因素的影响最大,重要性指数为0.38,远远超过了建筑和自然环境因素的影响。然而,当考虑非线性关系时,建筑环境和自然环境与死亡风险的关系更为明显。具体而言,人口集中、就业组合、土地利用组合和交通可达性与较低的死亡率相关,而较高的人口密度对应于较高的风险,但仅在每个变量的特定范围内。空气污染始终与较高的死亡率风险相关,而绿地构成与死亡率呈倒u型关系。在结构方程模型中,流动人口是连接城市蔓延特征与死亡率结果的关键途径,因为人口集中和土地使用组合通过较高的流动人口与较低的死亡率相关,而就业集中通过抑制流动人口而增加死亡率。这些关系具有显著的空间异质性。研究结果突出表明,需要采取有针对性的干预措施,将城市形态、自然环境和机会结构结合起来,以减少死亡率不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书