Agri-environment schemes and predator management: Impacts on brown hare populations in Hungarian farmland

IF 3.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04120
Nikolett Ujhegyi , Zsolt Biró , Veronika Bókony , Norbert Keller , Krisztián Katona , Miklós Heltai , Sándor Csányi , László Szemethy
{"title":"Agri-environment schemes and predator management: Impacts on brown hare populations in Hungarian farmland","authors":"Nikolett Ujhegyi ,&nbsp;Zsolt Biró ,&nbsp;Veronika Bókony ,&nbsp;Norbert Keller ,&nbsp;Krisztián Katona ,&nbsp;Miklós Heltai ,&nbsp;Sándor Csányi ,&nbsp;László Szemethy","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Population densities of brown hare (<em>Lepus europaeus</em>) have declined markedly over recent decades across Europe, largely driven by agricultural intensification and habitat homogenization. In response, Agri-Environment Schemes (AES) were introduced to mitigate biodiversity loss. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AES on brown hare populations across Hungary from 2007 to 2014, and the influence of vegetation quality and predator control (focused on the red fox, <em>Vulpes vulpes</em>) on AES effectiveness. Using data from 482 wildlife management units (WMUs), we analyzed relationships between hare densities, AES land cover (arable and grassland), vegetation quality (proportion of preferred habitats by hare), and fox reduction rates. Hare population estimates and harvest data were compared annually to a pre-AES baseline using linear mixed-effects models. We found consistent annual decline in hare densities regardless of vegetation quality. AES land cover was low (typically &lt;10 %) and had no significant positive effect on hare density. AES grasslands were often heavily grazed, reducing habitat suitability. WMUs with higher fox reduction rates had higher pre-AES baselines and steeper declines in hare densities, suggesting that predation control was insufficient for mitigating hare declines. The effects of AES land cover were not influenced by vegetation quality and predator control. Overall, our study found that AES measures in Hungary, particularly those involving grasslands, had limited effectiveness in supporting brown hare populations. We recommend increasing AES cover with more targeted, vegetation-specific AES practices and landscape-scale management to support long-term hare conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article e04120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989426000697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population densities of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) have declined markedly over recent decades across Europe, largely driven by agricultural intensification and habitat homogenization. In response, Agri-Environment Schemes (AES) were introduced to mitigate biodiversity loss. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AES on brown hare populations across Hungary from 2007 to 2014, and the influence of vegetation quality and predator control (focused on the red fox, Vulpes vulpes) on AES effectiveness. Using data from 482 wildlife management units (WMUs), we analyzed relationships between hare densities, AES land cover (arable and grassland), vegetation quality (proportion of preferred habitats by hare), and fox reduction rates. Hare population estimates and harvest data were compared annually to a pre-AES baseline using linear mixed-effects models. We found consistent annual decline in hare densities regardless of vegetation quality. AES land cover was low (typically <10 %) and had no significant positive effect on hare density. AES grasslands were often heavily grazed, reducing habitat suitability. WMUs with higher fox reduction rates had higher pre-AES baselines and steeper declines in hare densities, suggesting that predation control was insufficient for mitigating hare declines. The effects of AES land cover were not influenced by vegetation quality and predator control. Overall, our study found that AES measures in Hungary, particularly those involving grasslands, had limited effectiveness in supporting brown hare populations. We recommend increasing AES cover with more targeted, vegetation-specific AES practices and landscape-scale management to support long-term hare conservation.
农业环境方案和捕食者管理:对匈牙利农田褐兔种群的影响
近几十年来,整个欧洲的褐兔(Lepus europaeus)种群密度显著下降,主要是由于农业集约化和栖息地同质化。为此,引入了农业环境计划(AES)来缓解生物多样性的丧失。本研究评估了2007 - 2014年匈牙利全国棕色野兔种群的AES有效性,以及植被质量和捕食者控制(以赤狐为重点)对AES有效性的影响。利用482个野生动物管理单位(WMUs)的数据,分析了野兔密度、AES土地覆盖(耕地和草地)、植被质量(野兔偏好栖息地的比例)和狐狸减少率之间的关系。使用线性混合效应模型,每年将野兔种群估计和收获数据与aes之前的基线进行比较。我们发现,无论植被质量如何,野兔密度每年都在下降。AES土地覆被较低(典型值为<;10 %),对野兔密度无显著正向影响。AES草原经常被过度放牧,降低了生境适宜性。狐狸减少率较高的保护区,aes前基线较高,野兔密度下降幅度较大,表明捕食控制不足以缓解野兔数量下降。AES土地覆盖效果不受植被质量和捕食者控制的影响。总的来说,我们的研究发现匈牙利的AES措施,特别是那些涉及草原的措施,在支持褐兔种群方面的效果有限。我们建议通过更有针对性的、针对特定植被的AES实践和景观规模管理来增加AES覆盖,以支持长期的野兔保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书