Assessment of health-related quality of life with the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module in Latvian paediatric oncology patients

IF 2
EJC paediatric oncology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100500
Milāna Bloha , Dārta Valdovska , Anna Raita , Liene Smane , Santa Kursīte , Elīna Dimiņa
{"title":"Assessment of health-related quality of life with the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module in Latvian paediatric oncology patients","authors":"Milāna Bloha ,&nbsp;Dārta Valdovska ,&nbsp;Anna Raita ,&nbsp;Liene Smane ,&nbsp;Santa Kursīte ,&nbsp;Elīna Dimiņa","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment is an essential component of paediatric oncology care. The Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 Cancer Module is widely used to evaluate disease-specific HRQoL in children aged 2–18 years. This study assessed the reliability of the Latvian version of the module and examined HRQoL across age, diagnosis, and therapy intensity subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A methodological, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Children’s Clinical University Hospital (CCUH), in Riga, from February to July 2025. Patients (2–18 years) and their parents completed the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module (self-report and proxy-report questionnaires). Socio-demographic and clinical data were obtained from the medical records.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy-five children and their families were included. Internal consistencies ranged from 0.28 to 0.94, with most domains demonstrating acceptable reliability. A tendency of lower internal consistency in self-reports was observed among younger patients. No significant differences emerged between self- and proxy-reports. The range of p-values for non-significant differences in patient proxy-reports was 0.076–1.000. Lower HRQoL scores were noted for procedural anxiety in the youngest cohorts, communication and worry in 8–12-year-olds, nausea and cognitive problems in adolescents. Proxy-reports showed significantly lower physical appearance scores for central nervous system tumours versus haematological malignancies. In self-reports, higher treatment intensity was associated with lower procedural anxiety scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Latvian PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module is a reliable tool for the assessment of HRQoL in paediatric oncology patients. Subgroup differences were modest, supporting its broad applicability in clinical and research settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X2600019X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment is an essential component of paediatric oncology care. The Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 Cancer Module is widely used to evaluate disease-specific HRQoL in children aged 2–18 years. This study assessed the reliability of the Latvian version of the module and examined HRQoL across age, diagnosis, and therapy intensity subgroups.

Methods

A methodological, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Children’s Clinical University Hospital (CCUH), in Riga, from February to July 2025. Patients (2–18 years) and their parents completed the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module (self-report and proxy-report questionnaires). Socio-demographic and clinical data were obtained from the medical records.

Results

Seventy-five children and their families were included. Internal consistencies ranged from 0.28 to 0.94, with most domains demonstrating acceptable reliability. A tendency of lower internal consistency in self-reports was observed among younger patients. No significant differences emerged between self- and proxy-reports. The range of p-values for non-significant differences in patient proxy-reports was 0.076–1.000. Lower HRQoL scores were noted for procedural anxiety in the youngest cohorts, communication and worry in 8–12-year-olds, nausea and cognitive problems in adolescents. Proxy-reports showed significantly lower physical appearance scores for central nervous system tumours versus haematological malignancies. In self-reports, higher treatment intensity was associated with lower procedural anxiety scores.

Conclusions

The Latvian PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module is a reliable tool for the assessment of HRQoL in paediatric oncology patients. Subgroup differences were modest, supporting its broad applicability in clinical and research settings.
用PedsQL 3.0癌症模块评估拉脱维亚儿科肿瘤患者的健康相关生活质量
健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)评估是儿科肿瘤护理的重要组成部分。儿科生活质量量表(PedsQL) 3.0癌症模块被广泛用于评估2-18岁儿童疾病特异性HRQoL。本研究评估了拉脱维亚版本模块的可靠性,并检查了不同年龄、诊断和治疗强度亚组的HRQoL。方法于2025年2月至7月在里加儿童临床大学医院(CCUH)进行了一项方法学、描述性、横断面研究。患者(2-18岁)及其父母完成了PedsQL 3.0癌症模块(自我报告和代理报告问卷)。从医疗记录中获得社会人口和临床数据。结果共纳入75名儿童及其家庭。内部一致性范围从0.28到0.94,大多数域显示出可接受的可靠性。在年轻患者中观察到自我报告内部一致性较低的趋势。自我报告和代理报告之间没有显著差异。患者代理报告中无显著差异的p值范围为0.076-1.000。最年轻人群的程序性焦虑、8 - 12岁儿童的沟通和担忧、青少年的恶心和认知问题的HRQoL得分较低。代理报告显示中枢神经系统肿瘤的外表评分明显低于血液系统恶性肿瘤。在自我报告中,较高的治疗强度与较低的程序性焦虑评分相关。结论拉脱维亚PedsQL 3.0癌症模块是评估儿科肿瘤患者HRQoL的可靠工具。亚组差异不大,支持其在临床和研究环境中的广泛适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书