The implications of bifurcated citizenship and access to land in Africa: the case of DRC conflict

IF 2.8
Mbekezeli Comfort Mkhize, Chidochashe Nyere, T.D Tumba
{"title":"The implications of bifurcated citizenship and access to land in Africa: the case of DRC conflict","authors":"Mbekezeli Comfort Mkhize, Chidochashe Nyere, T.D Tumba","doi":"10.3389/fhumd.2025.1637169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of colonialism has impacted negatively on violent conflicts in Africa. The DRC conflict remains one of the violent and protracted conflicts the world has ever come across. Although extensive research is well-documented regarding the conflict, concerted efforts to find a sustainable and lasting peace remain a huge conundrum. Access to land and bifurcated citizenship has had serious implications in the escalation of the conflict. This is largely because there is a fierce contestation between natives and non-natives in DRC. The non-natives originally migrated from Rwanda and fled to DRC due to 1994 genocide. Yet, despite these contestations, the scholarly works that focus exclusively on the implications of local dynamics including access to land and bifurcated citizenship remain miniscule. As a result, further scrutiny is required to examine the implications of access to land and bifurcated citizenship in DRC. Through critical examination of existing literature, this paper argues that failure to comprehend and respond to local dynamics has had adverse consequences on the DRC conflict. In response, this paper aims to dissect and demystify the implications of local dynamics on the escalation of conflict by employing social identity theory, relative deprivation theory and consociationalism theory. Employing these theoretical perspectives assists greatly in determining (1) the implications of ethnic and/or tribal diversity on the conflict and contestations for land; (2) the causes of the conflict, and (3) to suggest viable and context-specific responses that can provide an enabling environment for sustainable peace. The findings reveal that addressing the issue of access to land and bifurcated citizenship can go a long way in alleviating the conflict in DRC. The findings also reveal that finding an amicable solution in DRC depends on addressing local dynamics and finding a bottom-up/multi-level response. Consequently, this paper recommends an integrated and differentiated approach to dealing with the conflict in question.","PeriodicalId":489828,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in human dynamics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-dynamics/articles/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1637169/pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in human dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1637169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The history of colonialism has impacted negatively on violent conflicts in Africa. The DRC conflict remains one of the violent and protracted conflicts the world has ever come across. Although extensive research is well-documented regarding the conflict, concerted efforts to find a sustainable and lasting peace remain a huge conundrum. Access to land and bifurcated citizenship has had serious implications in the escalation of the conflict. This is largely because there is a fierce contestation between natives and non-natives in DRC. The non-natives originally migrated from Rwanda and fled to DRC due to 1994 genocide. Yet, despite these contestations, the scholarly works that focus exclusively on the implications of local dynamics including access to land and bifurcated citizenship remain miniscule. As a result, further scrutiny is required to examine the implications of access to land and bifurcated citizenship in DRC. Through critical examination of existing literature, this paper argues that failure to comprehend and respond to local dynamics has had adverse consequences on the DRC conflict. In response, this paper aims to dissect and demystify the implications of local dynamics on the escalation of conflict by employing social identity theory, relative deprivation theory and consociationalism theory. Employing these theoretical perspectives assists greatly in determining (1) the implications of ethnic and/or tribal diversity on the conflict and contestations for land; (2) the causes of the conflict, and (3) to suggest viable and context-specific responses that can provide an enabling environment for sustainable peace. The findings reveal that addressing the issue of access to land and bifurcated citizenship can go a long way in alleviating the conflict in DRC. The findings also reveal that finding an amicable solution in DRC depends on addressing local dynamics and finding a bottom-up/multi-level response. Consequently, this paper recommends an integrated and differentiated approach to dealing with the conflict in question.
非洲公民身份分化和土地使用权的影响:以刚果民主共和国冲突为例
殖民主义的历史对非洲的暴力冲突产生了消极影响。刚果民主共和国冲突仍然是世界上最暴力和旷日持久的冲突之一。尽管对这场冲突进行了广泛的研究,但寻求可持续和持久和平的协调努力仍然是一个巨大的难题。获得土地和双重公民身份对冲突的升级产生了严重影响。这在很大程度上是因为刚果民主共和国本地人和非本地人之间存在激烈的竞争。由于1994年的种族灭绝,这些非当地人最初从卢旺达移民到刚果民主共和国。然而,尽管存在这些争论,专门关注包括土地获取和公民身份分化在内的地方动态影响的学术著作仍然很少。因此,需要进一步审查在刚果民主共和国获得土地和双重公民身份的影响。通过对现有文献的批判性审查,本文认为未能理解和应对当地动态对刚果民主共和国冲突产生了不利影响。为此,本文旨在运用社会认同理论、相对剥夺理论和联合主义理论,剖析和揭示地方动态对冲突升级的影响。运用这些理论观点有助于确定:(1)种族和/或部落多样性对土地冲突和争夺的影响;(2)冲突的原因,(3)提出可行的和具体的应对措施,为可持续和平提供有利的环境。调查结果表明,解决土地获取和公民身份分化问题可以在很大程度上缓解刚果民主共和国的冲突。研究结果还表明,在刚果民主共和国找到一个友好的解决方案取决于处理当地动态并找到自下而上/多层次的反应。因此,本文建议采取综合和区分的方法来处理有关冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书