Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric and neurological disorders: a systematic review.

IF 2.7
Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2026.2641166
Mariana Pita, Pedro H R Silva, Beatriz Cavendish, Tamires Zanão, Lais B Razza, Andre R Brunoni
{"title":"Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric and neurological disorders: a systematic review.","authors":"Mariana Pita, Pedro H R Silva, Beatriz Cavendish, Tamires Zanão, Lais B Razza, Andre R Brunoni","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2026.2641166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising neuromodulation technique for psychiatric and neurological disorders, but its clinical efficacy is heterogeneous. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to identify response predictors and understand underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted (PubMed/Web of Science/Embase) from inception to May 2025. Nineteen randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included, using MRI methods to investigate tDCS effects for major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia, alcohol use disorder (AUD), stroke, epilepsy, and fibromyalgia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outcomes focused on pre and post effects (<i>n</i> = 9), baseline MRI-based predictors (<i>n</i> = 7), or both (<i>n</i> = 3). Quality assessment showed that most studies (68.4%) had a low risk of bias. Functional MRI was the most frequent modality, followed by structural MRI. Besides methodological differences, findings were heterogeneous. Although some brain markers were identified, such as baseline brain structure in MDD, functional connectivity changes in schizophrenia and AUD, and motor network modulation in stroke, the strength and direction of these effects varied across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant heterogeneity and limited MRI-tDCS trials currently hinder mechanisms and biomarker establishment of tDCS. Future research should focus on standardizing MRI acquisition and analysis, which can improve reproducibility, and support robust findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"533-545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2026.2641166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising neuromodulation technique for psychiatric and neurological disorders, but its clinical efficacy is heterogeneous. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to identify response predictors and understand underlying mechanisms.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted (PubMed/Web of Science/Embase) from inception to May 2025. Nineteen randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included, using MRI methods to investigate tDCS effects for major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia, alcohol use disorder (AUD), stroke, epilepsy, and fibromyalgia.

Results: Outcomes focused on pre and post effects (n = 9), baseline MRI-based predictors (n = 7), or both (n = 3). Quality assessment showed that most studies (68.4%) had a low risk of bias. Functional MRI was the most frequent modality, followed by structural MRI. Besides methodological differences, findings were heterogeneous. Although some brain markers were identified, such as baseline brain structure in MDD, functional connectivity changes in schizophrenia and AUD, and motor network modulation in stroke, the strength and direction of these effects varied across studies.

Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity and limited MRI-tDCS trials currently hinder mechanisms and biomarker establishment of tDCS. Future research should focus on standardizing MRI acquisition and analysis, which can improve reproducibility, and support robust findings.

多模态磁共振成像结果经颅直流电刺激精神和神经疾病:系统回顾。
简介:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种很有前途的治疗精神和神经系统疾病的神经调节技术,但其临床疗效参差不齐。磁共振成像(MRI)可用于识别反应预测因子并了解潜在机制。方法:从建库到2025年5月进行系统综述(PubMed/Web of Science/Embase)。纳入19项随机临床试验(rct),采用MRI方法研究tDCS对重度抑郁症(MDD)、精神分裂症、酒精使用障碍(AUD)、中风、癫痫和纤维肌痛的影响。结果:结果集中于前后效应(n = 9),基于基线mri的预测因子(n = 7),或两者兼而有之(n = 3)。质量评价显示,大多数研究(68.4%)偏倚风险较低。功能MRI是最常见的方式,其次是结构MRI。除了方法上的差异,研究结果也是异质的。虽然已经确定了一些脑标记物,如MDD的基线脑结构,精神分裂症和AUD的功能连通性改变,以及卒中的运动网络调节,但这些影响的强度和方向在研究中各不相同。结论:显著的异质性和有限的MRI-tDCS试验目前阻碍了tDCS的机制和生物标志物的建立。未来的研究应侧重于标准化MRI采集和分析,以提高可重复性,并支持可靠的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书