Why is there no regulation despite evidence that ultra-processed foods are hazardous to long-term health?

Future healthcare journal Pub Date : 2026-01-22 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fhj.2026.100503
John O Warner, Alisha Khan
{"title":"Why is there no regulation despite evidence that ultra-processed foods are hazardous to long-term health?","authors":"John O Warner, Alisha Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2026.100503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have exceeded infectious diseases as a global health threat. This shift has occurred concurrently with changes to lifestyle and diet, of which the increased consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is particularly concerning. UPFs are defined by industrial processing of often cheaply sourced natural food and inclusion of non-nutritional additives such as azo-dye colourants, non-caloric sweeteners, emulsifiers and preservatives. They now account for approximately half of the caloric intake in many countries and notably by children. These products can compromise nutritional quality while promoting hedonistic hunger and disrupting the gut microbiota. Population studies are increasingly demonstrating an association between high UPF consumption and increased all-cause mortality, obesity, cardiovascular disease, cancer risk, mental health and neuro-behavioural disorders. While association studies cannot account for all potential confounding factors, triangulation through combining large-scale cohort studies with animal/<i>in vitro</i> models and human challenge studies provides more compelling evidence that UPFs increase the risks of NCDs. Despite the increasing evidence, regulatory action on their use has remained limited. We review the evidence and explore the reasons why effective regulation is lacking, with increasing examples of inappropriate food industry influence on political decisions in several countries. The current focus on reducing consumption of high fat, sugar and salt has distracted attention from the adverse effects of alternative non-nutritional additives. We propose changes to food labelling and call for public health interventions to combat and minimise UPF consumption. These interventions are especially vital for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and children, who increasingly consume UPFs as attractive and cheaper alternatives to fresh or minimally processed products. Urgent action is needed to promote healthier dietary practices worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"100503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12964288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2026.100503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have exceeded infectious diseases as a global health threat. This shift has occurred concurrently with changes to lifestyle and diet, of which the increased consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is particularly concerning. UPFs are defined by industrial processing of often cheaply sourced natural food and inclusion of non-nutritional additives such as azo-dye colourants, non-caloric sweeteners, emulsifiers and preservatives. They now account for approximately half of the caloric intake in many countries and notably by children. These products can compromise nutritional quality while promoting hedonistic hunger and disrupting the gut microbiota. Population studies are increasingly demonstrating an association between high UPF consumption and increased all-cause mortality, obesity, cardiovascular disease, cancer risk, mental health and neuro-behavioural disorders. While association studies cannot account for all potential confounding factors, triangulation through combining large-scale cohort studies with animal/in vitro models and human challenge studies provides more compelling evidence that UPFs increase the risks of NCDs. Despite the increasing evidence, regulatory action on their use has remained limited. We review the evidence and explore the reasons why effective regulation is lacking, with increasing examples of inappropriate food industry influence on political decisions in several countries. The current focus on reducing consumption of high fat, sugar and salt has distracted attention from the adverse effects of alternative non-nutritional additives. We propose changes to food labelling and call for public health interventions to combat and minimise UPF consumption. These interventions are especially vital for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and children, who increasingly consume UPFs as attractive and cheaper alternatives to fresh or minimally processed products. Urgent action is needed to promote healthier dietary practices worldwide.

Abstract Image

尽管有证据表明超加工食品对长期健康有害,为什么没有监管?
非传染性疾病已超过传染病,成为全球健康威胁。这种转变与生活方式和饮食的变化同时发生,其中超加工食品消费的增加尤其令人担忧。upf的定义是对通常廉价来源的天然食品进行工业加工,并加入偶氮染料、无热量甜味剂、乳化剂和防腐剂等非营养添加剂。在许多国家,尤其是儿童,它们现在约占热量摄入的一半。这些产品会损害营养质量,同时促进享乐性饥饿,破坏肠道微生物群。人口研究越来越多地表明,高UPF消费与全因死亡率、肥胖、心血管疾病、癌症风险、精神健康和神经行为障碍增加之间存在关联。虽然关联研究不能解释所有潜在的混杂因素,但通过将大规模队列研究与动物/体外模型和人类挑战研究相结合的三角测量提供了更有说服力的证据,证明upf增加了非传染性疾病的风险。尽管有越来越多的证据,但对其使用的管制行动仍然有限。我们回顾了证据,并探讨了缺乏有效监管的原因,在一些国家,越来越多的例子表明,食品行业对政治决策的影响不适当。目前的重点是减少高脂肪、糖和盐的消费,这分散了人们对替代非营养添加剂的不利影响的注意力。我们建议改变食品标签,并呼吁公共卫生干预措施,以打击和尽量减少UPF消费。这些干预措施对社会经济上处于不利地位的人群和儿童尤其重要,他们越来越多地消费upf,将其作为新鲜或最低限度加工产品的有吸引力且更便宜的替代品。需要采取紧急行动,在全世界推广更健康的饮食习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书