Classification and Reporting of Breast Arterial Calcifications: Current State and Ongoing Challenges.

IF 1.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Katherine Stephens, Ronaé K McLin, Rasha T Ismail, Miette Ogg, Omar Nemer, Donna M Plecha, Faezeh Sodagari
{"title":"Classification and Reporting of Breast Arterial Calcifications: Current State and Ongoing Challenges.","authors":"Katherine Stephens, Ronaé K McLin, Rasha T Ismail, Miette Ogg, Omar Nemer, Donna M Plecha, Faezeh Sodagari","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among women globally, with significant mortality and poorer outcomes compared with men. Traditional CVD risk assessment methods are less effective for women in part due to a lack of consideration for female-specific risk factors and the underrepresentation of women in research. Mammography, primarily used for breast cancer screening, also provides valuable data on breast arterial calcifications (BAC), which are associated with increased CVD risk. Despite its potential, BAC is not routinely reported or used in clinical practice due to variability in reporting practices and the absence of standardized reporting and clinical follow-up guidelines. Various qualitative and quantitative techniques for the classification of BAC and the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in automating BAC quantification have been suggested. Surveys reveal varying attitudes toward BAC reporting among patients, radiologists, and referring clinicians. Despite the potential benefits of BAC reporting for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment, challenges remain, including the need to assess the cost-effectiveness of long-term outcomes, standardized guidelines, and effective follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among women globally, with significant mortality and poorer outcomes compared with men. Traditional CVD risk assessment methods are less effective for women in part due to a lack of consideration for female-specific risk factors and the underrepresentation of women in research. Mammography, primarily used for breast cancer screening, also provides valuable data on breast arterial calcifications (BAC), which are associated with increased CVD risk. Despite its potential, BAC is not routinely reported or used in clinical practice due to variability in reporting practices and the absence of standardized reporting and clinical follow-up guidelines. Various qualitative and quantitative techniques for the classification of BAC and the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in automating BAC quantification have been suggested. Surveys reveal varying attitudes toward BAC reporting among patients, radiologists, and referring clinicians. Despite the potential benefits of BAC reporting for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment, challenges remain, including the need to assess the cost-effectiveness of long-term outcomes, standardized guidelines, and effective follow-up.

乳腺动脉钙化的分类和报告:现状和持续的挑战。
心血管疾病(CVD)仍然是全球妇女死亡的主要原因,与男性相比,死亡率很高,结果也较差。传统的心血管疾病风险评估方法对女性的效果较差,部分原因是缺乏对女性特有风险因素的考虑以及女性在研究中的代表性不足。乳房x光检查主要用于乳腺癌筛查,也提供了与CVD风险增加相关的乳腺动脉钙化(BAC)的宝贵数据。尽管BAC具有潜力,但由于报告实践的可变性以及缺乏标准化的报告和临床随访指南,BAC并未被常规报告或用于临床实践。提出了各种用于BAC分类的定性和定量技术以及人工智能(AI)在自动化BAC定量中的作用。调查显示,患者、放射科医生和转诊临床医生对BAC报告的态度各不相同。尽管BAC报告对个性化心血管风险评估有潜在的好处,但挑战仍然存在,包括评估长期结果的成本效益、标准化指南和有效随访的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书