Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the problematic experience of therapy scale (PETS-Swe) for patients with peripheral nerve injuries in the hand.

IF 1.7 Q4 REHABILITATION
Ulrika Wijk, Sara L Larsson, Jonas Svingen
{"title":"Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the problematic experience of therapy scale (PETS-Swe) for patients with peripheral nerve injuries in the hand.","authors":"Ulrika Wijk, Sara L Larsson, Jonas Svingen","doi":"10.1177/17589983261431760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Problematic Experience of Therapy Scale (PETS) identifies barriers to home-based exercise programs but has not been validated in hand therapy populations. This study aimed to translate the extended PETS into Swedish and evaluate its content and construct validity in patients undergoing early sensory relearning following peripheral nerve injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PETS was translated into Swedish (PETS-Swe) following established cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. Fifty-three patients with peripheral nerve injuries completed the PETS-Swe four weeks into a home-based sensory relearning program. Exercise adherence was monitored using a daily exercise diary. Content validity was assessed through expert review (face validity) and patient ratings of item relevance, clarity, and ambiguity. Item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (SCVI) content validity indices were calculated, alongside modified kappa statistics for interrater agreement. Construct validity was examined using Spearman's correlation between PETS-Swe scores and reported exercise frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Translation revealed no major discrepancies. Most items demonstrated high content validity (I-CVI and S-CVI >0.8), though lower relevance scores were observed in the technical subscale (I-CVI: 0.65-0.69). Interrater agreement was good to excellent across all items (K >0.74 for items 1-17; K = 0.6-0.74 for items 18-20). Expert reviewers confirmed strong face validity. Moderate negative correlations were found between PETS-Swe scores and exercise adherence (rho = -0.40 to exercise log; -0.57 to diary), supporting construct validity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Swedish version of the extended PETS is a valid tool for identifying barriers to home-based sensory relearning in patients with peripheral nerve injuries undergoing hand therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"17589983261431760"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12960264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983261431760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Problematic Experience of Therapy Scale (PETS) identifies barriers to home-based exercise programs but has not been validated in hand therapy populations. This study aimed to translate the extended PETS into Swedish and evaluate its content and construct validity in patients undergoing early sensory relearning following peripheral nerve injury.

Methods: The PETS was translated into Swedish (PETS-Swe) following established cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. Fifty-three patients with peripheral nerve injuries completed the PETS-Swe four weeks into a home-based sensory relearning program. Exercise adherence was monitored using a daily exercise diary. Content validity was assessed through expert review (face validity) and patient ratings of item relevance, clarity, and ambiguity. Item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (SCVI) content validity indices were calculated, alongside modified kappa statistics for interrater agreement. Construct validity was examined using Spearman's correlation between PETS-Swe scores and reported exercise frequency.

Results: Translation revealed no major discrepancies. Most items demonstrated high content validity (I-CVI and S-CVI >0.8), though lower relevance scores were observed in the technical subscale (I-CVI: 0.65-0.69). Interrater agreement was good to excellent across all items (K >0.74 for items 1-17; K = 0.6-0.74 for items 18-20). Expert reviewers confirmed strong face validity. Moderate negative correlations were found between PETS-Swe scores and exercise adherence (rho = -0.40 to exercise log; -0.57 to diary), supporting construct validity.

Discussion: The Swedish version of the extended PETS is a valid tool for identifying barriers to home-based sensory relearning in patients with peripheral nerve injuries undergoing hand therapy.

手部周围神经损伤患者问题体验治疗量表(pet - swe)瑞典版的翻译与验证。
导言:治疗问题体验量表(PETS)确定了家庭锻炼计划的障碍,但尚未在手部治疗人群中得到验证。本研究旨在将扩展的pet翻译成瑞典语,并评估其内容和构建的有效性,用于周围神经损伤后早期感觉再学习的患者。方法:根据建立的跨文化适应指南将pet翻译成瑞典语(pet - swe)。53名周围神经损伤患者完成了为期四周的pet - swe家庭感觉再学习项目。使用每日运动日记监测运动坚持情况。内容效度通过专家评价(面效度)和患者对项目相关性、清晰度和模糊性的评分来评估。计算项目水平(I-CVI)和量表水平(SCVI)的内容效度指数,以及修改的kappa统计量来衡量被调查者之间的一致性。结构效度检验采用Spearman的petts - swe评分和报告的运动频率之间的相关性。结果:翻译未发现重大差异。大部分项目显示出较高的内容效度(I-CVI和S-CVI >0.8),但在技术子量表中观察到较低的相关性得分(I-CVI: 0.65-0.69)。通译者的一致性在所有项目上都是好的到优秀的(项目1-17的K值为0.74;项目18-20的K值为0.6-0.74)。专家审稿人证实了较强的面孔效度。pet - swe评分与运动依从性之间存在中度负相关(对运动日志的rho = -0.40;对日记的rho = -0.57),支持结构效度。讨论:瑞典版的扩展pet是一种有效的工具,用于识别周围神经损伤接受手部治疗的患者家中感觉再学习的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书