[Use of Los Angeles Classification in Erosive Esophagitis: analysis of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement].

Q4 Medicine
Acta Gastroenterologica Latinoamericana Pub Date : 2025-12-23 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.52787/agl.v55i4.559
Anahí Ayelén de Los Rios, Juan Ignacio Olmos, José María Sanguinetti, Andrés Wonaga, Lorena Bortot, Esteban González Ballerga
{"title":"[Use of Los Angeles Classification in Erosive Esophagitis: analysis of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement].","authors":"Anahí Ayelén de Los Rios, Juan Ignacio Olmos, José María Sanguinetti, Andrés Wonaga, Lorena Bortot, Esteban González Ballerga","doi":"10.52787/agl.v55i4.559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a com-mon condition with a prevalence of 10 to 20% in Western countries. The Los Angeles Classification is the standard endoscopic system for categorizing erosive esophagitis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement among resident physicians and gastroenterology specialists in classifying the severity of reflux-related erosive esopha-gitis using the Los Angeles Classification.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 59 participants (25 specialists and 34 residents) who clas-sified 40 endoscopic images according to the Los Angeles Classification (10 images were duplicated). Inter-observ-er agreement was analyzed using Fleiss's kappa index and intra-observer agreement using Cohen's kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-observer agreement was moderate among specialists (κ = 0.425, IC95% 0.39 - 0.46) and acceptable among residents (κ = 0.297, IC95% 0.26-0.33), and the dif-ference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Over-all intra-observer agreement was moderate (κ = 0.525, IC95% 0.47 - 0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low inter- and intra-observer agreement was observed when using the Los Angeles Classification for esophagitis, with signifi-cant differences when comparing groups with different levels of experience. The development and application of local clinical-endoscopic protocols is recommended to standardize diagnostic and therapeutic criteria, optimize resources, and contribute to the training of gastroenter-ology specialists.</p>","PeriodicalId":35700,"journal":{"name":"Acta Gastroenterologica Latinoamericana","volume":"55 4","pages":"350-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Gastroenterologica Latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52787/agl.v55i4.559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a com-mon condition with a prevalence of 10 to 20% in Western countries. The Los Angeles Classification is the standard endoscopic system for categorizing erosive esophagitis.

Objectives: To evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement among resident physicians and gastroenterology specialists in classifying the severity of reflux-related erosive esopha-gitis using the Los Angeles Classification.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 59 participants (25 specialists and 34 residents) who clas-sified 40 endoscopic images according to the Los Angeles Classification (10 images were duplicated). Inter-observ-er agreement was analyzed using Fleiss's kappa index and intra-observer agreement using Cohen's kappa.

Results: Inter-observer agreement was moderate among specialists (κ = 0.425, IC95% 0.39 - 0.46) and acceptable among residents (κ = 0.297, IC95% 0.26-0.33), and the dif-ference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Over-all intra-observer agreement was moderate (κ = 0.525, IC95% 0.47 - 0.58).

Conclusion: Low inter- and intra-observer agreement was observed when using the Los Angeles Classification for esophagitis, with signifi-cant differences when comparing groups with different levels of experience. The development and application of local clinical-endoscopic protocols is recommended to standardize diagnostic and therapeutic criteria, optimize resources, and contribute to the training of gastroenter-ology specialists.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[洛杉矶分级在糜烂性食管炎中的应用:观察者间和观察者内一致性分析]。
胃食管反流病是一种常见病,在西方国家的患病率为10 - 20%。洛杉矶分类法是对糜烂性食管炎进行分类的标准内窥镜系统。目的:评估住院医师和胃肠病学专家在使用洛杉矶分级法对反流相关糜烂性食管炎严重程度进行分级时的内部和内部观察一致性。材料和方法:对59名参与者(25名专家和34名住院医生)进行了横断面研究,他们根据洛杉矶分类对40张内镜图像进行了分类(10张图像重复)。使用Fleiss的kappa指数分析观察者之间的一致性,使用Cohen的kappa指数分析观察者内部的一致性。结果:专科医师的观察者间一致性为中等(κ = 0.425, IC95% 0.39 ~ 0.46),住院医师的观察者间一致性为可接受(κ = 0.297, IC95% 0.26 ~ 0.33),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。总体观察者内部一致性中等(κ = 0.525, IC95% 0.47 - 0.58)。结论:在使用洛杉矶分级法诊断食管炎时,观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性较低,不同经验水平的组间差异显著。建议制定和应用当地的临床内镜协议,以规范诊断和治疗标准,优化资源,并有助于胃肠病学专家的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
Acta Gastroenterologica Latinoamericana Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Está dedicada a la investigación clínica y básica sobre todos los aspectos del aparato digestivo, incluídos el hígado, el páncreas y la nutrición, en seres humanos adultos y niños, animales de experimentación o sistemas celulares.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书