How do physicians perceive and manage the influence of their personal end-of-life preferences on clinical practice and end-of-life decision-making with patients? An international qualitative study.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2026-03-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524251413284
Sarah Mroz, Frederick Daenen, Sigrid Dierickx, Freddy Mortier, Ludovica De Panfilis, Luca Ghirotto, Toby C Campbell, Luc Deliens, Kenneth Chambaere
{"title":"How do physicians perceive and manage the influence of their personal end-of-life preferences on clinical practice and end-of-life decision-making with patients? An international qualitative study.","authors":"Sarah Mroz, Frederick Daenen, Sigrid Dierickx, Freddy Mortier, Ludovica De Panfilis, Luca Ghirotto, Toby C Campbell, Luc Deliens, Kenneth Chambaere","doi":"10.1177/26323524251413284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians are frequently asked what they would do in the position of their patients, and they have significant influence on end-of-life decisions. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the connection between physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and their clinical practice and the impact of this connection on patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore how physicians perceive and manage the impact of their end-of-life preferences on their clinical practice and end-of-life decision-making.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Exploratory qualitative study using in-depth interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five interviews were conducted from January to November 2022 using a semi-structured interview guide. Participants included three types of physicians: general practitioners, palliative care physicians, and other medical specialists in Belgium (Flanders), Italy, and the United States (Wisconsin). Data collection and analysis were informed by the reflexive thematic analysis approach. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim, and NVivo 12 was used for coding and analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians acknowledge the impact of their personal end-of-life preferences on their clinical practice and emphasize the importance of maintaining objectivity and centering decision-making on patient preferences. Physicians adopt strategies to mitigate potential biases. There is a divergence of opinion about whether it is appropriate to share when asked what they would do in the position of their patients. Most believe focusing on patients' values and priorities is essential and others feel sharing is crucial to maintain trust. Physicians struggle with ethical tensions and moral discomfort, particularly when patients' requests conflict with their beliefs. Physicians experience personal and professional growth through end-of-life discussions and reflection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians recognize and attempt to manage the impact of their own end-of-life preferences on their clinical practice. Physicians are not in agreement about sharing when asked what they would do in the situation of their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"20 ","pages":"26323524251413284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251413284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians are frequently asked what they would do in the position of their patients, and they have significant influence on end-of-life decisions. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the connection between physicians' personal end-of-life preferences and their clinical practice and the impact of this connection on patient care.

Objectives: To explore how physicians perceive and manage the impact of their end-of-life preferences on their clinical practice and end-of-life decision-making.

Design: Exploratory qualitative study using in-depth interviews.

Methods: Forty-five interviews were conducted from January to November 2022 using a semi-structured interview guide. Participants included three types of physicians: general practitioners, palliative care physicians, and other medical specialists in Belgium (Flanders), Italy, and the United States (Wisconsin). Data collection and analysis were informed by the reflexive thematic analysis approach. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim, and NVivo 12 was used for coding and analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was followed.

Results: Physicians acknowledge the impact of their personal end-of-life preferences on their clinical practice and emphasize the importance of maintaining objectivity and centering decision-making on patient preferences. Physicians adopt strategies to mitigate potential biases. There is a divergence of opinion about whether it is appropriate to share when asked what they would do in the position of their patients. Most believe focusing on patients' values and priorities is essential and others feel sharing is crucial to maintain trust. Physicians struggle with ethical tensions and moral discomfort, particularly when patients' requests conflict with their beliefs. Physicians experience personal and professional growth through end-of-life discussions and reflection.

Conclusion: Physicians recognize and attempt to manage the impact of their own end-of-life preferences on their clinical practice. Physicians are not in agreement about sharing when asked what they would do in the situation of their patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医生如何感知和管理他们个人临终偏好对临床实践和临终患者决策的影响?国际定性研究。
背景:医生经常被问及他们在病人的位置上会怎么做,他们对临终决定有很大的影响。因此,了解医生个人临终偏好与临床实践之间的联系以及这种联系对患者护理的影响是至关重要的。目的:探讨医生如何感知和管理他们的临终偏好对临床实践和临终决策的影响。设计:采用深度访谈的探索性定性研究。方法:采用半结构化访谈指南,于2022年1月至11月进行了45次访谈。参与者包括三种类型的医生:比利时(佛兰德斯)、意大利和美国(威斯康辛)的全科医生、姑息治疗医生和其他医学专家。数据收集和分析采用反身性专题分析方法。录音逐字转录,使用NVivo 12进行编码和分析。遵循报告定性研究的综合标准(COREQ)。结果:医生承认他们个人临终偏好对临床实践的影响,并强调保持客观性和以患者偏好为中心决策的重要性。医生采取策略来减轻潜在的偏见。当被问及他们站在病人的立场上会怎么做时,是否应该分享,人们的意见存在分歧。大多数人认为,关注患者的价值观和优先事项至关重要,而其他人则认为分享对维持信任至关重要。医生在伦理紧张和道德不适中挣扎,尤其是当病人的要求与他们的信仰相冲突时。医生通过临终讨论和反思来体验个人和专业的成长。结论:医生认识到并试图管理他们自己的临终偏好对临床实践的影响。当被问及他们在病人的情况下会怎么做时,医生们并不同意分享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书