Protocol for a pragmatic trial comparing navigator and automated virtual interventions for guaranteeing adherence to fecal immunochemical testing (NAVIGATE-FIT)

IF 1.5 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Emily Jansen , Divya A. Shankar , Tabitha Cherilus , Emily Foster , Lisa Ben-Horin , Nicholas Cordella , Nicholas A. Bosch , Kirsten Austad
{"title":"Protocol for a pragmatic trial comparing navigator and automated virtual interventions for guaranteeing adherence to fecal immunochemical testing (NAVIGATE-FIT)","authors":"Emily Jansen ,&nbsp;Divya A. Shankar ,&nbsp;Tabitha Cherilus ,&nbsp;Emily Foster ,&nbsp;Lisa Ben-Horin ,&nbsp;Nicholas Cordella ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Bosch ,&nbsp;Kirsten Austad","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) – a non-invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening method offers an opportunity to bridge CRC screening gaps in underserved settings. The effectiveness of FIT as a screening tool, however, is limited by low return rates of stool samples. Patient navigation has been demonstrated to successfully improve FIT return rates in randomized trial settings, however, in real-world settings, navigation may not achieve the same impact due to resource constraints. Text-based reminders offer a low-cost alternative to patient navigation to facilitate FIT test returns. In the NAVIGATE-FIT project, we seek to use rapid randomized testing to compare a text-based intervention to patient navigation in a quality improvement effort assessing if a text-based reminder program is non-inferior to patient navigation to improve FIT return rates in a safety-net hospital system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We will randomize primary care patients (English- or Spanish-speaking) due for CRC screening at Boston Medical Center (BMC) with an unreturned FIT test (ordered 30-37 days prior) to either a text messaging system (Artera) or patient navigation. Artera is an artificial intelligence enabled system which has been programmed with conversation text flows to facilitate FIT test returns. The patient navigation arm will prioritize patients with overdue FIT tests for a navigation phone call the week of randomization. Outcomes will be assessed in accordance with the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (REAIM) framework, and the project has been powered based on the effectiveness outcome of percentage of patients with a completed FIT test within 30 days of randomization. We have selected a non-inferiority margin of 13% on the risk difference scale and anticipate 80% power with inclusion of 196 patients in each arm. Primary analysis will be intention-to-treat. The primary project goal is to generate local knowledge to select a strategy to improve screening at BMC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The NAVIGATE-FIT project is well-positioned to test the hypothesis that a conversational text-based reminder and follow-up system is non-inferior to the current usual care patient navigation system at BMC, a large, academic, urban, safety-net hospital, for improving return rates of FIT screening tests. This protocol can serve as a model to other health systems seeking to undertake randomized quality improvement projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 101546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425001206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) – a non-invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening method offers an opportunity to bridge CRC screening gaps in underserved settings. The effectiveness of FIT as a screening tool, however, is limited by low return rates of stool samples. Patient navigation has been demonstrated to successfully improve FIT return rates in randomized trial settings, however, in real-world settings, navigation may not achieve the same impact due to resource constraints. Text-based reminders offer a low-cost alternative to patient navigation to facilitate FIT test returns. In the NAVIGATE-FIT project, we seek to use rapid randomized testing to compare a text-based intervention to patient navigation in a quality improvement effort assessing if a text-based reminder program is non-inferior to patient navigation to improve FIT return rates in a safety-net hospital system.

Methods

We will randomize primary care patients (English- or Spanish-speaking) due for CRC screening at Boston Medical Center (BMC) with an unreturned FIT test (ordered 30-37 days prior) to either a text messaging system (Artera) or patient navigation. Artera is an artificial intelligence enabled system which has been programmed with conversation text flows to facilitate FIT test returns. The patient navigation arm will prioritize patients with overdue FIT tests for a navigation phone call the week of randomization. Outcomes will be assessed in accordance with the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (REAIM) framework, and the project has been powered based on the effectiveness outcome of percentage of patients with a completed FIT test within 30 days of randomization. We have selected a non-inferiority margin of 13% on the risk difference scale and anticipate 80% power with inclusion of 196 patients in each arm. Primary analysis will be intention-to-treat. The primary project goal is to generate local knowledge to select a strategy to improve screening at BMC.

Conclusions

The NAVIGATE-FIT project is well-positioned to test the hypothesis that a conversational text-based reminder and follow-up system is non-inferior to the current usual care patient navigation system at BMC, a large, academic, urban, safety-net hospital, for improving return rates of FIT screening tests. This protocol can serve as a model to other health systems seeking to undertake randomized quality improvement projects.

Abstract Image

比较导航和自动虚拟干预以保证粪便免疫化学测试依从性的实用试验方案(navigator - fit)。
背景:粪便免疫化学测试(FIT) -一种非侵入性结直肠癌(CRC)筛查方法提供了一个机会,以弥补服务不足地区的CRC筛查差距。然而,FIT作为筛查工具的有效性受到粪便样本回收率低的限制。在随机试验环境中,患者导航已被证明可以成功地提高FIT的回报率,然而,在现实环境中,由于资源限制,导航可能无法达到相同的效果。基于文本的提醒为患者导航提供了一种低成本的选择,以促进FIT测试的返回。在navigator -FIT项目中,我们试图使用快速随机测试来比较基于文本的干预与患者导航的质量改进工作,以评估基于文本的提醒程序是否优于患者导航,以提高医院安全网系统中FIT的回报率。方法:我们将在波士顿医疗中心(BMC)进行CRC筛查的初级保健患者(英语或西班牙语)随机分组,并进行未返回的FIT测试(30-37天前订购),使用短信系统(Artera)或患者导航。Artera是一个人工智能启用的系统,它已被编程与对话文本流,以促进FIT测试返回。患者导航臂将在随机分组的那一周优先考虑FIT测试过期的患者进行导航电话呼叫。结果将根据Reach、有效性、采用、实施和维护(REAIM)框架进行评估,该项目是根据随机分组后30天内完成FIT测试的患者百分比的有效性结果进行评估的。我们在风险差异量表上选择了13%的非劣效性裕度,并在每组纳入196例患者的情况下预期80%的功效。主要分析将是意向治疗。项目的主要目标是产生本地知识,以选择一种策略来改善BMC的筛查。结论:在提高FIT筛查测试的回报率方面,基于对话文本的提醒和随访系统不低于BMC(一家大型学术性城市安全网络医院)现有的常规护理患者导航系统,该项目处于良好的位置来验证这一假设。该方案可作为寻求开展随机质量改进项目的其他卫生系统的样板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书