Sequence-based modeling of low-affinity transcription factor-DNA binding through deep learning.

IF 3 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2026-03-05 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1093/nargab/lqag027
Yingfei Wang, Jinsen Li, Tsu-Pei Chiu, Beibei Xin, Remo Rohs
{"title":"Sequence-based modeling of low-affinity transcription factor-DNA binding through deep learning.","authors":"Yingfei Wang, Jinsen Li, Tsu-Pei Chiu, Beibei Xin, Remo Rohs","doi":"10.1093/nargab/lqag027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple layers of molecular determinants and mechanisms affect binding specificity between transcription factors (TFs) and DNA. DNA sequence-based deep learning models using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and self-attention (SA) transformers have improved modeling accuracy and advanced our understanding of TF-DNA binding specificity through network interpretation. However, the systematic evaluation of various strategies for handling DNA sequence orientations in deep learning models-and their interpretation-remains underexplored, especially in the context of learning low-affinity binding site specificity. Using SELEX-seq data for eight Exd-Hox heterodimers in <i>Drosophila</i>, we compared canonical models with data augmentation and reverse-complement weight-sharing models. We found that reverse-complement weight-sharing CNN models and SA models trained with augmented data with reverse complements outperformed other approaches in modeling binding specificity. In this work, we evaluated several interpretation methods, including Gradient*input, DeconvNet, DeepLIFT, and <i>in silico</i> mutagenesis (ISM). Compared to other interpretation methods, ISM was less sensitive to model hyperparameter settings. In this work, we identified Exd-Ubx binding at low-affinity sites and suggested possible biophysical mechanisms. The findings of this study will be relevant for studying the functional role of low-affinity TF binding in gene regulatory mechanisms with possible implications on TF-DNA binding specificity guided protein design.</p>","PeriodicalId":33994,"journal":{"name":"NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics","volume":"8 1","pages":"lqag027"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12961433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqag027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple layers of molecular determinants and mechanisms affect binding specificity between transcription factors (TFs) and DNA. DNA sequence-based deep learning models using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and self-attention (SA) transformers have improved modeling accuracy and advanced our understanding of TF-DNA binding specificity through network interpretation. However, the systematic evaluation of various strategies for handling DNA sequence orientations in deep learning models-and their interpretation-remains underexplored, especially in the context of learning low-affinity binding site specificity. Using SELEX-seq data for eight Exd-Hox heterodimers in Drosophila, we compared canonical models with data augmentation and reverse-complement weight-sharing models. We found that reverse-complement weight-sharing CNN models and SA models trained with augmented data with reverse complements outperformed other approaches in modeling binding specificity. In this work, we evaluated several interpretation methods, including Gradient*input, DeconvNet, DeepLIFT, and in silico mutagenesis (ISM). Compared to other interpretation methods, ISM was less sensitive to model hyperparameter settings. In this work, we identified Exd-Ubx binding at low-affinity sites and suggested possible biophysical mechanisms. The findings of this study will be relevant for studying the functional role of low-affinity TF binding in gene regulatory mechanisms with possible implications on TF-DNA binding specificity guided protein design.

基于深度学习的低亲和转录因子- dna结合序列建模。
多层分子决定因素和机制影响转录因子(TFs)与DNA之间的结合特异性。使用卷积神经网络(cnn)和自注意(SA)变压器的基于DNA序列的深度学习模型提高了建模精度,并通过网络解释提高了我们对TF-DNA结合特异性的理解。然而,在深度学习模型中处理DNA序列取向的各种策略的系统评估及其解释仍然没有得到充分的探索,特别是在学习低亲和力结合位点特异性的背景下。利用果蝇8种Exd-Hox异源二聚体的SELEX-seq数据,我们将典型模型与数据增强模型和反向补体权重共享模型进行了比较。我们发现,反向补体权重共享CNN模型和使用反向补体增强数据训练的SA模型在建模结合特异性方面优于其他方法。在这项工作中,我们评估了几种解释方法,包括Gradient*input, DeconvNet, DeepLIFT和硅诱变(ISM)。与其他解释方法相比,ISM对模型超参数设置的敏感性较低。在这项工作中,我们确定了Exd-Ubx在低亲和力位点的结合,并提出了可能的生物物理机制。本研究结果将有助于研究低亲和力TF结合在基因调控机制中的功能作用,并可能对TF- dna结合特异性指导蛋白设计产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
95
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书