{"title":"Sequence-based modeling of low-affinity transcription factor-DNA binding through deep learning.","authors":"Yingfei Wang, Jinsen Li, Tsu-Pei Chiu, Beibei Xin, Remo Rohs","doi":"10.1093/nargab/lqag027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple layers of molecular determinants and mechanisms affect binding specificity between transcription factors (TFs) and DNA. DNA sequence-based deep learning models using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and self-attention (SA) transformers have improved modeling accuracy and advanced our understanding of TF-DNA binding specificity through network interpretation. However, the systematic evaluation of various strategies for handling DNA sequence orientations in deep learning models-and their interpretation-remains underexplored, especially in the context of learning low-affinity binding site specificity. Using SELEX-seq data for eight Exd-Hox heterodimers in <i>Drosophila</i>, we compared canonical models with data augmentation and reverse-complement weight-sharing models. We found that reverse-complement weight-sharing CNN models and SA models trained with augmented data with reverse complements outperformed other approaches in modeling binding specificity. In this work, we evaluated several interpretation methods, including Gradient*input, DeconvNet, DeepLIFT, and <i>in silico</i> mutagenesis (ISM). Compared to other interpretation methods, ISM was less sensitive to model hyperparameter settings. In this work, we identified Exd-Ubx binding at low-affinity sites and suggested possible biophysical mechanisms. The findings of this study will be relevant for studying the functional role of low-affinity TF binding in gene regulatory mechanisms with possible implications on TF-DNA binding specificity guided protein design.</p>","PeriodicalId":33994,"journal":{"name":"NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics","volume":"8 1","pages":"lqag027"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12961433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqag027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiple layers of molecular determinants and mechanisms affect binding specificity between transcription factors (TFs) and DNA. DNA sequence-based deep learning models using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and self-attention (SA) transformers have improved modeling accuracy and advanced our understanding of TF-DNA binding specificity through network interpretation. However, the systematic evaluation of various strategies for handling DNA sequence orientations in deep learning models-and their interpretation-remains underexplored, especially in the context of learning low-affinity binding site specificity. Using SELEX-seq data for eight Exd-Hox heterodimers in Drosophila, we compared canonical models with data augmentation and reverse-complement weight-sharing models. We found that reverse-complement weight-sharing CNN models and SA models trained with augmented data with reverse complements outperformed other approaches in modeling binding specificity. In this work, we evaluated several interpretation methods, including Gradient*input, DeconvNet, DeepLIFT, and in silico mutagenesis (ISM). Compared to other interpretation methods, ISM was less sensitive to model hyperparameter settings. In this work, we identified Exd-Ubx binding at low-affinity sites and suggested possible biophysical mechanisms. The findings of this study will be relevant for studying the functional role of low-affinity TF binding in gene regulatory mechanisms with possible implications on TF-DNA binding specificity guided protein design.