Bridging Functions and Values: Advancing Wetland Ecosystem Service Assessment Through Use of a Service Capacity Index.

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Wetlands Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s13157-025-02028-1
William J Kleindl, Sarah P Church, Kai C Rains, Mark C Rains, Eric D Stein, Morgan K Suddreth
{"title":"Bridging Functions and Values: Advancing Wetland Ecosystem Service Assessment Through Use of a Service Capacity Index.","authors":"William J Kleindl, Sarah P Church, Kai C Rains, Mark C Rains, Eric D Stein, Morgan K Suddreth","doi":"10.1007/s13157-025-02028-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wetland service or values are often assumed to occur at a comparable level to wetland function (i.e., higher functioning wetlands provide more services). However, services are seldom directly evaluated because of the lack of structured assessment approaches. For wetland ecosystem service to be effectively incorporated in regulatory and monitoring programs, there needs to be parsimonious assessment tools that can be applied systematically, repeatably, and rapidly. This approach begins by disentangling existing terminology and clearly defining all the terms necessary to support the assessment of ecosystem services (ES). We provide context to illustrate how these terms have been variously employed in wetland science and policy, and follow with a conceptual framework for a rapid wetland ES assessment tool that is implemented as a module to existing rapid wetland function or condition assessment tools. We employ a <i>service capacity index</i> (SCI) that builds on existing concepts of functional capacity indices (FCIs) by incorporating the <i>opportunity</i> for beneficiaries to avail themselves of the source and sink ecological products provided by wetlands. We argue that if the goal of assessment is to meet compensatory mitigation requirements of unavoidable loss of wetland service, an SCI is an appropriate complement to an FCI. We illustrate the application of the proposed approach using Montana floodplain wetlands as an example.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"46 3","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12960418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-025-02028-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wetland service or values are often assumed to occur at a comparable level to wetland function (i.e., higher functioning wetlands provide more services). However, services are seldom directly evaluated because of the lack of structured assessment approaches. For wetland ecosystem service to be effectively incorporated in regulatory and monitoring programs, there needs to be parsimonious assessment tools that can be applied systematically, repeatably, and rapidly. This approach begins by disentangling existing terminology and clearly defining all the terms necessary to support the assessment of ecosystem services (ES). We provide context to illustrate how these terms have been variously employed in wetland science and policy, and follow with a conceptual framework for a rapid wetland ES assessment tool that is implemented as a module to existing rapid wetland function or condition assessment tools. We employ a service capacity index (SCI) that builds on existing concepts of functional capacity indices (FCIs) by incorporating the opportunity for beneficiaries to avail themselves of the source and sink ecological products provided by wetlands. We argue that if the goal of assessment is to meet compensatory mitigation requirements of unavoidable loss of wetland service, an SCI is an appropriate complement to an FCI. We illustrate the application of the proposed approach using Montana floodplain wetlands as an example.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

桥接功能与价值:利用服务能力指数推进湿地生态系统服务评价
湿地的服务或价值通常被认为与湿地的功能相当(即功能越高的湿地提供的服务越多)。然而,由于缺乏结构化的评估方法,很少对服务进行直接评估。为了将湿地生态系统服务有效地纳入监管和监测计划,需要有能够系统、可重复和快速应用的简洁评估工具。这种方法首先要理清现有的术语,明确定义支持生态系统服务评估(ES)所需的所有术语。我们提供了上下文来说明这些术语如何在湿地科学和政策中得到不同的应用,并遵循快速湿地ES评估工具的概念框架,该工具作为现有快速湿地功能或状况评估工具的模块实施。我们采用了服务能力指数(SCI),该指数建立在现有功能能力指数(fci)概念的基础上,纳入了受益者利用湿地提供的源和汇生态产品的机会。我们认为,如果评估的目标是满足对不可避免的湿地服务损失的补偿性缓解要求,那么SCI是对FCI的适当补充。我们以蒙大拿州洪泛平原湿地为例说明了该方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wetlands
Wetlands 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书