Incorporating Patient Perspectives into Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Drug Development Framework Recommendation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Emuella Flood, Niklas Karlsson, Jennifer Ostridge, Bistra Kirova, Tim Sullivan, György Zörényi, Barbara Valastro, Jiyoon Park
{"title":"Incorporating Patient Perspectives into Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Drug Development Framework Recommendation.","authors":"Emuella Flood, Niklas Karlsson, Jennifer Ostridge, Bistra Kirova, Tim Sullivan, György Zörényi, Barbara Valastro, Jiyoon Park","doi":"10.1007/s43441-026-00940-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulatory agencies have been promoting the incorporation of the patient perspective into benefit-risk assessment to better align regulatory decisions with patients' needs and priorities. Currently, benefit-risk assessments for regulatory submissions primarily capture the patient perspective through patient-reported outcome data from clinical trials. However, there is a push for a more systematic approach to capturing the patient perspective in benefit-risk assessment and decision-making throughout the drug development life cycle. Although different guidelines and frameworks have been developed, consensus on how to systematically incorporate the patient perspective into structured benefit-risk (sBR) assessment remains elusive. In 2023, Sullivan et al. published an sBR assessment framework that was developed to enhance systematic and collaborative decision-making throughout a drug life cycle. Here we propose how this sBR assessment framework could be expanded, committing to a patient-centered approach by considering the patient perspective at every step of drug development. These recommendations aim to put patients at the center of drug development, ultimately leading to better treatment outcomes and improved lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"713-724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-026-00940-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulatory agencies have been promoting the incorporation of the patient perspective into benefit-risk assessment to better align regulatory decisions with patients' needs and priorities. Currently, benefit-risk assessments for regulatory submissions primarily capture the patient perspective through patient-reported outcome data from clinical trials. However, there is a push for a more systematic approach to capturing the patient perspective in benefit-risk assessment and decision-making throughout the drug development life cycle. Although different guidelines and frameworks have been developed, consensus on how to systematically incorporate the patient perspective into structured benefit-risk (sBR) assessment remains elusive. In 2023, Sullivan et al. published an sBR assessment framework that was developed to enhance systematic and collaborative decision-making throughout a drug life cycle. Here we propose how this sBR assessment framework could be expanded, committing to a patient-centered approach by considering the patient perspective at every step of drug development. These recommendations aim to put patients at the center of drug development, ultimately leading to better treatment outcomes and improved lives.

将患者观点纳入结构化收益-风险评估:药物开发框架建议。
监管机构一直在推动将患者的观点纳入利益-风险评估,以更好地使监管决策与患者的需求和优先事项保持一致。目前,监管机构提交的收益-风险评估主要通过临床试验中患者报告的结果数据来获取患者的观点。然而,在整个药物开发生命周期中,有一种更系统的方法来捕捉患者的利益-风险评估和决策。尽管已经制定了不同的指导方针和框架,但关于如何系统地将患者观点纳入结构化收益-风险(sBR)评估的共识仍然难以捉摸。2023年,Sullivan等人发布了一个sBR评估框架,旨在加强整个药物生命周期的系统性和协作性决策。在这里,我们提出了如何扩展sBR评估框架,通过在药物开发的每一步考虑患者的观点,致力于以患者为中心的方法。这些建议旨在将患者置于药物开发的中心,最终导致更好的治疗结果和改善生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书