Inclusion of a recovery period after pulse treatment in the primary human lymphocyte micronucleus assay covers potential cell cycle delays without loss of sensitivity.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2026-06-27 DOI:10.1093/mutage/geag013
Alina Goepfert, Miriam Spies, Natascha Partosa, Silke Spang, James Whitwell, Robert Smith, Abigail Lamb, Christine Marchand, Andreas Zeller, Jasmin Lott, Kristina Trenz, Azeddine Elhajouji, Hans-Joerg Martus, Murielle Brichet, Martin Schneider, Steffen Naumann, Markus Schulz, Jessica Dieckhoff, Naveed Honarvar, Robert Landsiedel
{"title":"Inclusion of a recovery period after pulse treatment in the primary human lymphocyte micronucleus assay covers potential cell cycle delays without loss of sensitivity.","authors":"Alina Goepfert, Miriam Spies, Natascha Partosa, Silke Spang, James Whitwell, Robert Smith, Abigail Lamb, Christine Marchand, Andreas Zeller, Jasmin Lott, Kristina Trenz, Azeddine Elhajouji, Hans-Joerg Martus, Murielle Brichet, Martin Schneider, Steffen Naumann, Markus Schulz, Jessica Dieckhoff, Naveed Honarvar, Robert Landsiedel","doi":"10.1093/mutage/geag013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development test guideline no. (TG) 487 for the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test (MNT), short (pulse) treatment of primary human lymphocytes should be followed immediately by a sampling period of 1.5-2.0 cell cycle lengths in the presence of cytochalasin B. However, TG 487 allows extending the sampling period \"if it is known or suspected that the test chemical affects the cell cycling time.\" It is often unknown in advance whether a test substance induces cell cycle delays, and therefore whether an extension of the sampling period is warranted. Here, we investigate whether extending the sampling time after pulse treatment-by including a recovery period prior to cytochalasin B treatment-affects the sensitivity of the in vitro MNT. Primary human lymphocytes were exposed to 11 mutagens and assessed using two protocols (\"recovery\" and \"no recovery\") in parallel from the same treatment culture. Including a recovery period after pulse treatment generally allowed testing of higher concentrations without excessive cytotoxicity. In addition, cultures subjected to a recovery period showed generally higher micronucleus rates at concentrations with acceptable levels of cytotoxicity, compared to cultures not having undergone a recovery period. To compare the sensitivity of both protocols at non-cytotoxic concentrations, benchmark concentration analysis was performed. Here, the \"recovery method\" proved to be at least as sensitive as the \"no recovery method.\" The reproducibility of these findings was demonstrated in an interlaboratory ring trial using a subset of up to five mutagens. In conclusion, the inclusion of a recovery period after pulse treatment per se covers potential substance-induced cell cycle delays without any loss in sensitivity toward the induced mutagenic effect. The \"recovery\" protocol can be used for assessing the mutagenic potential of test substances affecting and not affecting the cell cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":18889,"journal":{"name":"Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":"189-205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geag013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development test guideline no. (TG) 487 for the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test (MNT), short (pulse) treatment of primary human lymphocytes should be followed immediately by a sampling period of 1.5-2.0 cell cycle lengths in the presence of cytochalasin B. However, TG 487 allows extending the sampling period "if it is known or suspected that the test chemical affects the cell cycling time." It is often unknown in advance whether a test substance induces cell cycle delays, and therefore whether an extension of the sampling period is warranted. Here, we investigate whether extending the sampling time after pulse treatment-by including a recovery period prior to cytochalasin B treatment-affects the sensitivity of the in vitro MNT. Primary human lymphocytes were exposed to 11 mutagens and assessed using two protocols ("recovery" and "no recovery") in parallel from the same treatment culture. Including a recovery period after pulse treatment generally allowed testing of higher concentrations without excessive cytotoxicity. In addition, cultures subjected to a recovery period showed generally higher micronucleus rates at concentrations with acceptable levels of cytotoxicity, compared to cultures not having undergone a recovery period. To compare the sensitivity of both protocols at non-cytotoxic concentrations, benchmark concentration analysis was performed. Here, the "recovery method" proved to be at least as sensitive as the "no recovery method." The reproducibility of these findings was demonstrated in an interlaboratory ring trial using a subset of up to five mutagens. In conclusion, the inclusion of a recovery period after pulse treatment per se covers potential substance-induced cell cycle delays without any loss in sensitivity toward the induced mutagenic effect. The "recovery" protocol can be used for assessing the mutagenic potential of test substances affecting and not affecting the cell cycle.

在原发人淋巴细胞微核测定中纳入脉冲治疗后的恢复期,涵盖了潜在的细胞周期延迟而不丧失敏感性。
根据经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的测试指引(TG) 487对于体外哺乳动物细胞微核试验(MNT),在细胞放松素b存在的情况下,对原代人淋巴细胞进行短(脉冲)处理后,应立即进行1.5 - 2.0细胞周期长度的采样周期。然而,TG 487允许“如果已知或怀疑测试化学物质影响细胞周期时间”延长采样周期。通常事先不知道测试物质是否会引起细胞周期延迟,因此是否有必要延长采样周期。在这里,我们研究了延长脉冲治疗后的采样时间(包括细胞松弛素B治疗前的恢复期)是否会影响体外MNT的敏感性。将原代人淋巴细胞暴露于11种诱变剂中,并使用两种方案(“恢复”和“不恢复”)从相同的处理培养中平行进行评估。包括脉冲治疗后的恢复期,通常允许在没有过度细胞毒性的情况下测试较高浓度。此外,与未经过恢复期的培养物相比,经过恢复期的培养物在具有可接受的细胞毒性水平的浓度下,微核率普遍较高。为了比较两种方案在非细胞毒性浓度下的敏感性,进行了基准浓度分析。在这里,“回收法”被证明至少与“不回收法”一样敏感。这些发现的可重复性在使用多达五种诱变剂的实验室间环试验中得到证实。总之,脉冲治疗后的恢复期本身涵盖了潜在的物质诱导的细胞周期延迟,而对诱导诱变效应的敏感性没有任何损失。“恢复”方案可用于评估影响和不影响细胞周期的试验物质的致突变潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mutagenesis
Mutagenesis 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mutagenesis is an international multi-disciplinary journal designed to bring together research aimed at the identification, characterization and elucidation of the mechanisms of action of physical, chemical and biological agents capable of producing genetic change in living organisms and the study of the consequences of such changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书