Upper arm administration is associated with higher injection site pain with romosozumab: a randomized controlled trial and a self-controlled study.

IF 3 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2026-02-14 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag022
Soji Tani, Tomoyuki Asada, Hiro Hasegawa, Peter Passias, Koki Tsuchiya, Mahoko Ishikawa, William Richardson, Yoshifumi Kudo, Benjamin Alman, Koji Ishikawa
{"title":"Upper arm administration is associated with higher injection site pain with romosozumab: a randomized controlled trial and a self-controlled study.","authors":"Soji Tani, Tomoyuki Asada, Hiro Hasegawa, Peter Passias, Koki Tsuchiya, Mahoko Ishikawa, William Richardson, Yoshifumi Kudo, Benjamin Alman, Koji Ishikawa","doi":"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>These 2 prospective studies investigated whether the injection site influences pain and local reactions with romosozumab treatment for osteoporosis. In Study 1, 169 patients were randomly assigned to receive monthly romosozumab 210 mg (2 vials) injections for 12 mo in either the abdomen (Abd group) or upper arm (Arm group). In Study 2, 55 patients received 105 mg (1 vial) injections in both sites to directly compare pain at each location. Pain was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, mm), and secondary outcomes included BMD, bone turnover markers (BTMs) (total P1NP and TRACP-5b), and injection site reactions (ISRs). In the randomized trial, 70 of 85 patients (82.4%) in the Abd group and 69 of 84 (82.1%) in the Arm group completed the study. The Arm group reported significantly greater pain than the Abd group, starting after the fifth injection (mean difference, 6.8 mm [95% CI, 0.7-12.8]; <i>p</i> = .029) and continuing through the 12th injection (9.5 mm [95% CI, 2.9-16.1]; <i>p</i> = .005). Although crude ISR rates were similar (Abd, 26.2% vs Arm, 35.8%; <i>p</i> = .24), multivariable analysis showed a higher ISR incidence in the Arm group (incidence rate ratio: 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01-2.95]; <i>p</i> = .045). In Study 2, pain was consistently greater at the upper arm, beginning with the first injection (mean difference, 5.2 mm [95% CI, 1.7-8.7]; <i>p</i> = .004) and continuing through the 12th (8.1 mm [95% CI, 4.2-11.9]; <i>p</i> < .001). BMD and BTMs did not differ between sites. In conclusion, upper arm injections were associated with greater pain and higher ISR incidence without affecting bone metabolism. Selecting an injection site based on comfort may improve patient experience during romosozumab therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":"10 4","pages":"ziag022"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These 2 prospective studies investigated whether the injection site influences pain and local reactions with romosozumab treatment for osteoporosis. In Study 1, 169 patients were randomly assigned to receive monthly romosozumab 210 mg (2 vials) injections for 12 mo in either the abdomen (Abd group) or upper arm (Arm group). In Study 2, 55 patients received 105 mg (1 vial) injections in both sites to directly compare pain at each location. Pain was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, mm), and secondary outcomes included BMD, bone turnover markers (BTMs) (total P1NP and TRACP-5b), and injection site reactions (ISRs). In the randomized trial, 70 of 85 patients (82.4%) in the Abd group and 69 of 84 (82.1%) in the Arm group completed the study. The Arm group reported significantly greater pain than the Abd group, starting after the fifth injection (mean difference, 6.8 mm [95% CI, 0.7-12.8]; p = .029) and continuing through the 12th injection (9.5 mm [95% CI, 2.9-16.1]; p = .005). Although crude ISR rates were similar (Abd, 26.2% vs Arm, 35.8%; p = .24), multivariable analysis showed a higher ISR incidence in the Arm group (incidence rate ratio: 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01-2.95]; p = .045). In Study 2, pain was consistently greater at the upper arm, beginning with the first injection (mean difference, 5.2 mm [95% CI, 1.7-8.7]; p = .004) and continuing through the 12th (8.1 mm [95% CI, 4.2-11.9]; p < .001). BMD and BTMs did not differ between sites. In conclusion, upper arm injections were associated with greater pain and higher ISR incidence without affecting bone metabolism. Selecting an injection site based on comfort may improve patient experience during romosozumab therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

romosozumab上臂给药与较高注射部位疼痛相关:一项随机对照试验和一项自我对照研究。
这两项前瞻性研究调查了注射部位是否影响罗莫索单抗治疗骨质疏松症的疼痛和局部反应。在研究1中,169名患者被随机分配接受每月210 mg(2瓶)的romosozumab注射,为期12个月,在腹部(Abd组)或上臂(arm组)。在研究2中,55名患者在两个部位注射105 mg(1瓶),直接比较每个部位的疼痛。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS, mm)评估疼痛,次要结果包括骨密度、骨转换标志物(BTMs)(总P1NP和TRACP-5b)和注射部位反应(ISRs)。在随机试验中,Abd组85例患者中有70例(82.4%)完成了研究,Arm组84例患者中有69例(82.1%)完成了研究。从第五次注射后开始,Arm组报告的疼痛明显大于Abd组(平均差异为6.8 mm [95% CI, 0.7-12.8];029),并持续到第12次注射(9.5 mm [95% CI, 2.9-16.1]; p = 0.005)。尽管原油ISR率相似(Abd, 26.2% vs Arm, 35.8%; p =。24),多变量分析显示,Arm组ISR发生率较高(发生率比:1.73 [95% CI, 1.01-2.95]; p = 0.045)。在研究2中,从第一次注射开始,上臂疼痛持续加重(平均差值为5.2 mm [95% CI, 1.7-8.7];004),并持续到第12期(8.1 mm) [95% CI, 4.2-11.9]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书