To compare the effect of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine spray at the surgical site during closure in lumbar spine fixation surgery for postoperative pain relief: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

Q3 Medicine
Annamalaei, Atul Kumar Singh, Yashpal Singh, Birju Manjhi, Arun Raj Pandey, Bikram Kumar Gupta
{"title":"To compare the effect of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine spray at the surgical site during closure in lumbar spine fixation surgery for postoperative pain relief: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.","authors":"Annamalaei, Atul Kumar Singh, Yashpal Singh, Birju Manjhi, Arun Raj Pandey, Bikram Kumar Gupta","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_89_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar spine surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain due to the extensive handling of tissue and bone. Multimodal analgesia is the preferred choice but is associated with systemic side effects. Atomized drugs at the local surgical site may be a more attractive option than the intravenous route. In this study, we compare the atomized form of ketamine and dexmedetomidine at the surgical site for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After approval from institutional ethics committee and the Clinical Trial Registry - India, 45 patients of age group between 18 and 60 years, scheduled for lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia were divided into three equal groups: Group D: Received dexmedetomidine 1 µ/kg, Group K: Received Ketamine 1 mg/kg and Group N: Received 20 ml of normal saline. Drugs were diluted in 20 mL of normal saline and applied over the surgical site at the end of the surgery, before closure, in the form of fine droplets using an atomizer device. Our primary outcome was the postoperative analgesia measured by the Visual Analog Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the ketamine group, 240 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 120-360) than the dexmedetomidine group, 120 min (IQR: 120-240) determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atomized ketamine and dexmedetomidine at the surgical site during closure in lumbar spine fixation surgery is an attractive choice for postoperative pain relief without any systemic side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12962446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_89_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spine surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain due to the extensive handling of tissue and bone. Multimodal analgesia is the preferred choice but is associated with systemic side effects. Atomized drugs at the local surgical site may be a more attractive option than the intravenous route. In this study, we compare the atomized form of ketamine and dexmedetomidine at the surgical site for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgeries.

Methods: After approval from institutional ethics committee and the Clinical Trial Registry - India, 45 patients of age group between 18 and 60 years, scheduled for lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia were divided into three equal groups: Group D: Received dexmedetomidine 1 µ/kg, Group K: Received Ketamine 1 mg/kg and Group N: Received 20 ml of normal saline. Drugs were diluted in 20 mL of normal saline and applied over the surgical site at the end of the surgery, before closure, in the form of fine droplets using an atomizer device. Our primary outcome was the postoperative analgesia measured by the Visual Analog Scale.

Results: Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the ketamine group, 240 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 120-360) than the dexmedetomidine group, 120 min (IQR: 120-240) determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Atomized ketamine and dexmedetomidine at the surgical site during closure in lumbar spine fixation surgery is an attractive choice for postoperative pain relief without any systemic side effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

比较氯胺酮与右美托咪定喷雾在腰椎固定手术闭合手术部位缓解术后疼痛的效果:前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
背景:腰椎手术与严重的术后疼痛有关,因为大量处理组织和骨骼。多模式镇痛是首选,但有全身副作用。在局部手术部位雾化药物可能是比静脉注射途径更有吸引力的选择。在这项研究中,我们比较了氯胺酮和右美托咪定在手术部位的雾化形式,以缓解腰椎手术后的疼痛。方法:经机构伦理委员会和印度临床试验注册中心批准,将45例年龄在18 ~ 60岁的腰椎全麻手术患者分为3组:D组:右美托咪定1µ/kg, K组:氯胺酮1 mg/kg, N组:生理盐水20 ml。药物在20ml生理盐水中稀释,并在手术结束前使用雾化装置以细滴的形式涂抹在手术部位。我们的主要观察指标是用视觉模拟量表测量的术后镇痛。结果:氯胺酮组术后镇痛持续时间为240 min(四分位数间距[IQR]: 120 ~ 360)明显高于右美托咪定组,Kruskal-Wallis检验测定的120 min (IQR: 120 ~ 240) (P < 0.001)。结论:氯胺酮和右美托咪定在腰椎固定术闭合术部位雾化是一种有吸引力的术后疼痛缓解选择,无全身副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书