Identification of effective weaning through diaphragmatic ultrasound added to clinical parameters among mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit at a tertiary care center: A prospective observational study.

Q3 Medicine
Rakesh Bahadur Singh, Prashant Kumar Mishra, Urvashi Yadav, Ayush Kumar Pandey
{"title":"Identification of effective weaning through diaphragmatic ultrasound added to clinical parameters among mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit at a tertiary care center: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Rakesh Bahadur Singh, Prashant Kumar Mishra, Urvashi Yadav, Ayush Kumar Pandey","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_98_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective and timely weaning is essential for improving the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study was conducted to determine whether diaphragmatic thickness fraction measured by ultrasound provides any additional benefit when combined with clinical parameters for successful weaning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted on 100 mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. When the criteria for weaning were satisfactorily fulfilled, a spontaneous breathing trial was administered. Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) and bedside ultrasound to measure diaphragmatic thickness fraction (DTF) were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RSBI and DTF were calculated utilizing a cutoff value of RSBI <82 and a DTF cutoff of >37%. The predictability of weaning success was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients observed, 68 patients had weaning success while 32 patients experienced weaning failure. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of RSBI were greater compared to DTF (88.23%, 96.87%, 98.36%, and 79.48% vs. 88.23%, 84.37%, 92.30%, and 77.14% respectively). The AUROC values for RSBI, DTF, and their combination were 0.86, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of RSBI with DTF was found to be -0.475.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSBI proved to be a highly reliable predictor of successful weaning, demonstrating superior diagnostic accuracy. The combination of RSBI and DTF improved the diagnostic validity profile, suggesting that integration of diaphragmatic ultrasound with conventional clinical indices enhances the reliability of weaning assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"12-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12962445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_98_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective and timely weaning is essential for improving the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study was conducted to determine whether diaphragmatic thickness fraction measured by ultrasound provides any additional benefit when combined with clinical parameters for successful weaning.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 100 mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. When the criteria for weaning were satisfactorily fulfilled, a spontaneous breathing trial was administered. Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) and bedside ultrasound to measure diaphragmatic thickness fraction (DTF) were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RSBI and DTF were calculated utilizing a cutoff value of RSBI <82 and a DTF cutoff of >37%. The predictability of weaning success was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results: Of the 100 patients observed, 68 patients had weaning success while 32 patients experienced weaning failure. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of RSBI were greater compared to DTF (88.23%, 96.87%, 98.36%, and 79.48% vs. 88.23%, 84.37%, 92.30%, and 77.14% respectively). The AUROC values for RSBI, DTF, and their combination were 0.86, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of RSBI with DTF was found to be -0.475.

Conclusion: RSBI proved to be a highly reliable predictor of successful weaning, demonstrating superior diagnostic accuracy. The combination of RSBI and DTF improved the diagnostic validity profile, suggesting that integration of diaphragmatic ultrasound with conventional clinical indices enhances the reliability of weaning assessment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

三级医疗中心重症监护室机械通气患者通过膈超声识别有效脱机的临床参数:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:有效和及时的断奶对改善重症监护病房(ICU)患者的预后至关重要。本研究旨在确定超声测量的膈肌厚度分数与临床参数相结合,是否能为成功脱机提供任何额外的益处。方法:对100例ICU机械通气患者进行前瞻性观察研究。当断奶标准令人满意地满足时,进行自主呼吸试验。记录快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)和床边超声测量膈肌厚度分数(DTF)。采用RSBI 37%的临界值计算RSBI和DTF的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估断奶成功的可预测性。结果:100例患者中,68例成功脱机,32例脱机失败。RSBI的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV均高于DTF(分别为88.23%、96.87%、98.36%和79.48%,分别为88.23%、84.37%、92.30%和77.14%)。RSBI、DTF及其组合的AUROC值分别为0.86、0.78和0.90。RSBI与DTF的Pearson相关系数为-0.475。结论:RSBI被证明是一个高度可靠的预测成功断奶,显示优越的诊断准确性。RSBI和DTF联合应用提高了诊断的有效性,提示膈超声与常规临床指标的结合提高了断奶评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书