Continuous Ketone Monitoring in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Prospective Multicenter Method-Comparison and Feasibility Study.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1177/15209156261428034
Nathan L Haas, Frederick K Korley, Ryan M Schneider, Sai Likhita Mamillapalli, Emily Hepworth, James A Cranford, Yu Kuei Lin, Richard T Griffey
{"title":"Continuous Ketone Monitoring in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Prospective Multicenter Method-Comparison and Feasibility Study.","authors":"Nathan L Haas, Frederick K Korley, Ryan M Schneider, Sai Likhita Mamillapalli, Emily Hepworth, James A Cranford, Yu Kuei Lin, Richard T Griffey","doi":"10.1177/15209156261428034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuous ketone monitoring (CKM) could optimize diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) treatment by monitoring beta-hydroxybutyrate (BOHB) continuously and minimally invasively. However, data on the agreement between interstitial and venous BOHB during DKA is lacking. Our objectives were to assess the feasibility of CKM during DKA and the agreement between interstitial and venous BOHB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective multicenter method-comparison study conducted at two U.S. emergency departments. Adults (>18 years) in DKA were included. BOHB was measured via SiBio CKM and compared with simultaneously collected venous BOHB every 2 h during DKA treatment. Following DKA resolution, study staff removed CKM and assessed for complications. The primary outcome was level of agreement via Bland-Altman analysis between simultaneously collected CKM and venous BOHB values. Additional outcomes included correlation (<i>r</i>) between concurrent CKM and venous BOHB values, first detection of DKA resolution, and feasibility (uncomplicated application and removal of CKM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 40.8 years, 56% male, 50% Black, 79% type I diabetes, and mean presenting BOHB 7.0 mmol/L (range 2.5-13.5). We analyzed 164 paired CKM and venous BOHB values (mean [standard deviation (SD)] paired values per patient: 4.8 [3.8], range 1-16). Bland-Altman analysis found the average difference between CKM and venous BOHB was -0.38 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.63, 0.88). CKM values were strongly correlated with venous BOHB (<i>r</i> = 0.96, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The CKM value was lower than venous for 79% of paired values. DKA resolution was detected 55 min earlier (mean, 95% CI 26-84, <i>p</i> = 0.001) via CKM than standard care. No device-related complications occurred, and CKM application and removal were well tolerated by all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CKM during DKA treatment was feasible, provided clinically accurate BOHB readings, and detected DKA resolution earlier than standard care. CKM-guided DKA treatment is a promising strategy with the potential to improve the quality and value of DKA care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"992-998"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156261428034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Continuous ketone monitoring (CKM) could optimize diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) treatment by monitoring beta-hydroxybutyrate (BOHB) continuously and minimally invasively. However, data on the agreement between interstitial and venous BOHB during DKA is lacking. Our objectives were to assess the feasibility of CKM during DKA and the agreement between interstitial and venous BOHB.

Methods: This was a prospective multicenter method-comparison study conducted at two U.S. emergency departments. Adults (>18 years) in DKA were included. BOHB was measured via SiBio CKM and compared with simultaneously collected venous BOHB every 2 h during DKA treatment. Following DKA resolution, study staff removed CKM and assessed for complications. The primary outcome was level of agreement via Bland-Altman analysis between simultaneously collected CKM and venous BOHB values. Additional outcomes included correlation (r) between concurrent CKM and venous BOHB values, first detection of DKA resolution, and feasibility (uncomplicated application and removal of CKM).

Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 40.8 years, 56% male, 50% Black, 79% type I diabetes, and mean presenting BOHB 7.0 mmol/L (range 2.5-13.5). We analyzed 164 paired CKM and venous BOHB values (mean [standard deviation (SD)] paired values per patient: 4.8 [3.8], range 1-16). Bland-Altman analysis found the average difference between CKM and venous BOHB was -0.38 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.63, 0.88). CKM values were strongly correlated with venous BOHB (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). The CKM value was lower than venous for 79% of paired values. DKA resolution was detected 55 min earlier (mean, 95% CI 26-84, p = 0.001) via CKM than standard care. No device-related complications occurred, and CKM application and removal were well tolerated by all patients.

Conclusion: CKM during DKA treatment was feasible, provided clinically accurate BOHB readings, and detected DKA resolution earlier than standard care. CKM-guided DKA treatment is a promising strategy with the potential to improve the quality and value of DKA care.

糖尿病酮症酸中毒持续酮监测:前瞻性多中心方法-比较和可行性研究。
导语:持续酮监测(CKM)可以通过持续、微创监测β -羟基丁酸(BOHB)来优化糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的治疗。然而,关于DKA期间间质和静脉BOHB之间一致性的数据缺乏。我们的目的是评估DKA期间CKM的可行性以及间质和静脉BOHB之间的一致性。方法:这是一项在美国两个急诊科进行的前瞻性多中心方法比较研究。纳入DKA成人(bb0 - 18岁)。通过SiBio CKM检测BOHB,并与DKA治疗期间每2 h同时采集的静脉BOHB进行比较。DKA解决后,研究人员切除CKM并评估并发症。主要终点是通过Bland-Altman分析同时采集的CKM和静脉BOHB值之间的一致性水平。其他结果包括并发CKM与静脉BOHB值之间的相关性(r), DKA分辨率的首次检测以及可行性(简单的CKM应用和去除)。结果:34例患者入组,平均年龄40.8岁,56%为男性,50%为黑人,79%为I型糖尿病,平均BOHB 7.0 mmol/L(范围2.5-13.5)。我们分析了164个配对CKM和静脉BOHB值(每位患者的平均[标准差(SD)]配对值:4.8[3.8],范围1-16)。Bland-Altman分析发现CKM和静脉BOHB的平均差异为-0.38 mmol/L(95%可信区间[CI] -1.63, 0.88)。CKM值与静脉BOHB密切相关(r = 0.96, p < 0.001)。在配对值中,79%的CKM值低于静脉。通过CKM检测DKA的时间比标准治疗早55分钟(平均95% CI 26-84, p = 0.001)。无器械相关并发症发生,所有患者对CKM的应用和移除耐受良好。结论:在DKA治疗期间进行CKM是可行的,提供临床准确的BOHB读数,并且比标准治疗更早检测到DKA的消退。ckm引导的DKA治疗是一种很有前途的策略,有可能提高DKA护理的质量和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书