Vasoactive–Inotropic Score Reduction Rate Is Highly Associated With Prognosis for Critically Ill Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Real-World Dynamic Data
{"title":"Vasoactive–Inotropic Score Reduction Rate Is Highly Associated With Prognosis for Critically Ill Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Real-World Dynamic Data","authors":"Yi-Le Ning, Tian-Xiang Guan, Xiao-Li Niu, Qian-Qian Ma, Yuan-Na Zhang, Ting-Yu Peng, Li-Xiong Zeng, Hang Li, Hui-Ting Guan","doi":"10.1155/cdr/8989505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In cardiogenic shock (CS), titration of both the choice and dosage of inotropes and vasopressors is crucial. The vasoactive–inotropic score (VIS) quantifies hemodynamic support, while the effect of temporal VIS change on prognosis remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between the vasoactive–inotropic score reduction rate (VRR) to measure VIS changes over time and explore its association with mortality in CS patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective observational study using two large intensive care databases (MIMIC-IV and eICU). Adult patients with CS receiving vasoactive–inotropic agents within 24 h after ICU admission were included. VIS was calculated using the updated VIS 2020, and VRR was defined to capture the relative change in VIS over time. Patients were categorized into VIS-decreasing and VIS-increasing groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality (28-day mortality only for the MIMIC-IV database). Associations between VRR and outcomes were examined using four models: (1) log-rank analysis, (2) Cox model adjusted for all covariates, (3) Cox model adjusted for covariates selected by univariable analyses, and (4) Cox model adjusted for covariates selected by a random forest algorithm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 3170 adult CS patients were analyzed. All models in both MIMIC-IV and eICU showed that an increasing VIS over time was consistently associated with higher in-hospital, ICU, and 28-day mortality compared with a decreasing VIS in the MIMIC-IV cohort (<i>p</i> < 0.001). These findings were reproduced in the external eICU cohort for ICU and in-hospital mortality (<i>p</i> < 0.001), supporting the robustness and generalizability of VRR as a prognostic indicator across heterogeneous ICUs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In adult CS patients, a greater reduction in VIS over time is strongly associated with lower mortality. VRR provides a simple, dynamic summary of vasoactive trajectories and may serve as a useful adjunct for risk stratification alongside other clinical and biochemical markers, although prospective validation is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9582,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/cdr/8989505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In cardiogenic shock (CS), titration of both the choice and dosage of inotropes and vasopressors is crucial. The vasoactive–inotropic score (VIS) quantifies hemodynamic support, while the effect of temporal VIS change on prognosis remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between the vasoactive–inotropic score reduction rate (VRR) to measure VIS changes over time and explore its association with mortality in CS patients.
Methods
We performed a retrospective observational study using two large intensive care databases (MIMIC-IV and eICU). Adult patients with CS receiving vasoactive–inotropic agents within 24 h after ICU admission were included. VIS was calculated using the updated VIS 2020, and VRR was defined to capture the relative change in VIS over time. Patients were categorized into VIS-decreasing and VIS-increasing groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality (28-day mortality only for the MIMIC-IV database). Associations between VRR and outcomes were examined using four models: (1) log-rank analysis, (2) Cox model adjusted for all covariates, (3) Cox model adjusted for covariates selected by univariable analyses, and (4) Cox model adjusted for covariates selected by a random forest algorithm.
Results
A total of 3170 adult CS patients were analyzed. All models in both MIMIC-IV and eICU showed that an increasing VIS over time was consistently associated with higher in-hospital, ICU, and 28-day mortality compared with a decreasing VIS in the MIMIC-IV cohort (p < 0.001). These findings were reproduced in the external eICU cohort for ICU and in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001), supporting the robustness and generalizability of VRR as a prognostic indicator across heterogeneous ICUs.
Conclusions
In adult CS patients, a greater reduction in VIS over time is strongly associated with lower mortality. VRR provides a simple, dynamic summary of vasoactive trajectories and may serve as a useful adjunct for risk stratification alongside other clinical and biochemical markers, although prospective validation is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Therapeutics (formerly Cardiovascular Drug Reviews) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on cardiovascular and clinical pharmacology, as well as clinical trials of new cardiovascular therapies. Articles on translational research, pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, device, gene and cell therapies, and pharmacoepidemiology are also encouraged.
Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to):
Acute coronary syndrome
Arrhythmias
Atherosclerosis
Basic cardiac electrophysiology
Cardiac catheterization
Cardiac remodeling
Coagulation and thrombosis
Diabetic cardiovascular disease
Heart failure (systolic HF, HFrEF, diastolic HF, HFpEF)
Hyperlipidemia
Hypertension
Ischemic heart disease
Vascular biology
Ventricular assist devices
Molecular cardio-biology
Myocardial regeneration
Lipoprotein metabolism
Radial artery access
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement.