Mach number effect on the high-amplitude Richtmyer–Meshkov instability using the DSMC method

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Yan Liu, Hao Chen
{"title":"Mach number effect on the high-amplitude Richtmyer–Meshkov instability using the DSMC method","authors":"Yan Liu,&nbsp;Hao Chen","doi":"10.1007/s42401-025-00434-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study conducts a numerical investigation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) at microscale Helium/Argon interfaces using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method. The hydrodynamic behaviour and evolutionary mechanisms governing the single-mode RMI with high-amplitude are discussed, with the consideration of different Mach numbers (<i>Ma</i>) ranging from 1.5 to 6.0. Key findings reveal two distinct evolutionary pathways. In the high-Mach regime (<i>Ma</i> ≥ 3), complex shock configurations form through the establishment of Mach stem, accompanied by sustained positive vorticity deposition along the slipstream. This persistent process drives cavity initiation at spike apices. In the low-Mach regime (<i>Ma</i> ≤ 2), gradual degradation of Mach stem to regular reflection configurations occurs, wherein viscous dissipation extinguishes the vorticity accumulation and suppresses cavity formation. Quantitative comparison with DSMC data demonstrates that the Zhang and Guo (ZG) theoretical model has a prediction error of less than 20% for the overall amplitude growth of RMI across different <i>Ma</i> numbers, yet overestimates the bubble amplitude growth with a prediction error of approximately 50%, particularly in the late nonlinear stage. A dedicated discussion on gas species is also presented, revealing that the ZG theoretical model aligns well with the DSMC-calculated overall amplitude growth at high <i>Ma</i> numbers, with relative errors below 20%. Furthermore, the influence of <i>Ma</i> on the discrepancy between ZG model predictions and DSMC data diminishes as the Atwood number increases.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36309,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Systems","volume":"9 1","pages":"185 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42401-025-00434-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study conducts a numerical investigation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) at microscale Helium/Argon interfaces using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method. The hydrodynamic behaviour and evolutionary mechanisms governing the single-mode RMI with high-amplitude are discussed, with the consideration of different Mach numbers (Ma) ranging from 1.5 to 6.0. Key findings reveal two distinct evolutionary pathways. In the high-Mach regime (Ma ≥ 3), complex shock configurations form through the establishment of Mach stem, accompanied by sustained positive vorticity deposition along the slipstream. This persistent process drives cavity initiation at spike apices. In the low-Mach regime (Ma ≤ 2), gradual degradation of Mach stem to regular reflection configurations occurs, wherein viscous dissipation extinguishes the vorticity accumulation and suppresses cavity formation. Quantitative comparison with DSMC data demonstrates that the Zhang and Guo (ZG) theoretical model has a prediction error of less than 20% for the overall amplitude growth of RMI across different Ma numbers, yet overestimates the bubble amplitude growth with a prediction error of approximately 50%, particularly in the late nonlinear stage. A dedicated discussion on gas species is also presented, revealing that the ZG theoretical model aligns well with the DSMC-calculated overall amplitude growth at high Ma numbers, with relative errors below 20%. Furthermore, the influence of Ma on the discrepancy between ZG model predictions and DSMC data diminishes as the Atwood number increases.

马赫数对高振幅richmyer - meshkov不稳定性的影响
本文采用直接模拟蒙特卡罗(DSMC)方法对微尺度氦/氩界面的richmyer - meshkov不稳定性(RMI)进行了数值研究。在考虑马赫数为1.5 ~ 6.0的情况下,讨论了高振幅单模RMI的水动力行为和进化机制。关键发现揭示了两种不同的进化途径。在高马赫数区域(Ma≥3),通过马赫数杆的建立形成复杂激波构型,并伴随滑流持续的正涡量沉积。这个持续的过程驱动在穗尖形成空腔。在低马赫数状态下(Ma≤2),马赫数杆逐渐退化为规则反射构型,其中粘性耗散消除涡量积累,抑制空腔形成。与DSMC数据的定量比较表明,Zhang和Guo (ZG)理论模型对RMI在不同Ma数下的总体幅度增长的预测误差小于20%,但高估了气泡幅度增长,预测误差约为50%,特别是在非线性后期阶段。对气体种类进行了专门的讨论,表明ZG理论模型与dsmc计算的高Ma数下的总体振幅增长非常吻合,相对误差低于20%。此外,随着Atwood数的增加,Ma对ZG模型预测与DSMC数据之间差异的影响减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace Systems
Aerospace Systems Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Aerospace Systems provides an international, peer-reviewed forum which focuses on system-level research and development regarding aeronautics and astronautics. The journal emphasizes the unique role and increasing importance of informatics on aerospace. It fills a gap in current publishing coverage from outer space vehicles to atmospheric vehicles by highlighting interdisciplinary science, technology and engineering. Potential topics include, but are not limited to: Trans-space vehicle systems design and integration Air vehicle systems Space vehicle systems Near-space vehicle systems Aerospace robotics and unmanned system Communication, navigation and surveillance Aerodynamics and aircraft design Dynamics and control Aerospace propulsion Avionics system Opto-electronic system Air traffic management Earth observation Deep space exploration Bionic micro-aircraft/spacecraft Intelligent sensing and Information fusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书