An example of identifying conditional dependence in graphical models using Bayesian model averaging: general and disease specific anxiety in a cardiovascular patient sample.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s10865-026-00641-x
Ascher Munion, Maeve M Sargeant, Elizabeth Jordan, Erica P Barwick, Benjamin C Degner, Samuel F Sears
{"title":"An example of identifying conditional dependence in graphical models using Bayesian model averaging: general and disease specific anxiety in a cardiovascular patient sample.","authors":"Ascher Munion, Maeve M Sargeant, Elizabeth Jordan, Erica P Barwick, Benjamin C Degner, Samuel F Sears","doi":"10.1007/s10865-026-00641-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parsing the interplay of psychological symptoms is difficult yet crucial for both disorder conceptualization and development of targeted interventions. This study used a Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) approach to network analysis to identify the most probable structures and to evaluate conditional dependence underlying symptomology in 110 cardiovascular patients diagnosed with a Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA). Symptoms of general and disease-specific distress were assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) and the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire-Attention Subscale (CAQ-A). Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and Bayes Factors (BF) were used to inform model selection and quantify model uncertainty. We present both the psychological symptom network with the highest posterior probability—and thus the best predictive utility and the BMA network, which produces tests of conditional dependence and independence which average over all structures and thus are not conditional on the other variables present in a single selected reference model. However, the posterior distribution showed variability in plausible complexity, or the number of parameters in the network structure. Utilizing BMA is especially protective in cases of structural uncertainty and high complexity. Of the 171 possible edges, 19 edges had strong evidence for inclusion. Notably, two edges connected the general and cardiac anxiety scales: DASS_7 (worry about experiencing panic) to CAQ_3 (chest discomfort wakes me up at night) and DASS_9 (Aware of Heart Symptoms) to CAQ_2 (racing heart wakes me up at night). This emphasizes the prevalent link between physiological components contributing to both general and cardiac anxiety. This approach highlights the utility of these methods in revealing selective and specific symptom interactions and offer a set of plausible causal associations, which could inform future studies (and Directed Acyclic Graphs) oriented towards testing causal mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"328-336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-026-00641-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parsing the interplay of psychological symptoms is difficult yet crucial for both disorder conceptualization and development of targeted interventions. This study used a Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) approach to network analysis to identify the most probable structures and to evaluate conditional dependence underlying symptomology in 110 cardiovascular patients diagnosed with a Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA). Symptoms of general and disease-specific distress were assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) and the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire-Attention Subscale (CAQ-A). Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and Bayes Factors (BF) were used to inform model selection and quantify model uncertainty. We present both the psychological symptom network with the highest posterior probability—and thus the best predictive utility and the BMA network, which produces tests of conditional dependence and independence which average over all structures and thus are not conditional on the other variables present in a single selected reference model. However, the posterior distribution showed variability in plausible complexity, or the number of parameters in the network structure. Utilizing BMA is especially protective in cases of structural uncertainty and high complexity. Of the 171 possible edges, 19 edges had strong evidence for inclusion. Notably, two edges connected the general and cardiac anxiety scales: DASS_7 (worry about experiencing panic) to CAQ_3 (chest discomfort wakes me up at night) and DASS_9 (Aware of Heart Symptoms) to CAQ_2 (racing heart wakes me up at night). This emphasizes the prevalent link between physiological components contributing to both general and cardiac anxiety. This approach highlights the utility of these methods in revealing selective and specific symptom interactions and offer a set of plausible causal associations, which could inform future studies (and Directed Acyclic Graphs) oriented towards testing causal mechanisms.

使用贝叶斯模型平均在图形模型中识别条件依赖性的一个例子:心血管患者样本中的一般焦虑和疾病特异性焦虑。
分析心理症状的相互作用是困难的,但对于障碍的概念化和有针对性的干预措施的发展至关重要。本研究使用贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)方法进行网络分析,以确定最可能的结构,并评估110例诊断为胸主动脉瘤(TAA)的心血管患者的条件依赖性。使用抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS-21)和心脏焦虑问卷-注意子量表(CAQ-A)评估一般和疾病特异性窘迫症状。贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)和贝叶斯因子(BF)用于模型选择和量化模型不确定性。我们提出了具有最高后验概率的心理症状网络和最佳预测效用的BMA网络,它产生条件依赖性和独立性的测试,这些测试对所有结构进行平均,因此不依赖于单个选定参考模型中存在的其他变量。然而,后验分布在似是而非的复杂性或网络结构中参数的数量上表现出可变性。在结构不确定和高度复杂的情况下,使用BMA尤其具有保护作用。在171条可能的边中,有19条边有很强的包容性证据。值得注意的是,一般焦虑量表和心脏焦虑量表之间有两条边:DASS_7(担心经历恐慌)到CAQ_3(胸部不适使我夜间醒来)和DASS_9(意识到心脏症状)到CAQ_2(心跳加速使我夜间醒来)。这强调了导致一般焦虑和心脏焦虑的生理成分之间的普遍联系。这种方法强调了这些方法在揭示选择性和特异性症状相互作用方面的效用,并提供了一组合理的因果关系,这可以为未来的研究(和有向无环图)提供信息,以测试因果机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书