Michele D Anzabi, Austin M Stroud, Richard R Sharp
{"title":"Ethical Considerations for AI-Enabled Voice Analysis: Features of an Emerging Bioethics Literature.","authors":"Michele D Anzabi, Austin M Stroud, Richard R Sharp","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2026.2632091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the emergence of voice as a digital biomarker for various health conditions over the last decade, healthcare institutions are exploring avenues to leverage this technology to improve patient outcomes and clinical workflow efficiencies. Voice analysis technologies have the potential to streamline clinical care from speech-based diagnoses to assessing disease risk. This interest in healthcare innovation must also correspond with an understanding of the scope of ethical concerns and focal points that exist within this emerging literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Given the significant discourse outside traditional ethics journals, we conducted a review of the literature focusing on artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled voice analysis technologies for clinical diagnosis and monitoring purposes to inform the practice of AI ethics scholars, consultants, and instructors. Studies were published between 2010 and 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, OVID Embase, or Google Scholar. We evaluated 1871 articles, with 48 articles included in the final review that explore the ethics of clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical applications of these technologies centered around using voice data for diagnosis of pulmonary and neurological conditions, mental health screening, provider decision-making assistance, and remote patient monitoring. Key themes related to ethics included: ethical design and validation; data privacy and security; health equity; trust, transparency, and accountability; alterations to the physicia-patient relationship; and current guidelines and policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As healthcare systems work to create policies and best practices for voice analysis technologies, further research is necessary to understand the perspectives of stakeholders who will be essential for the adoption of these technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"61-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2026.2632091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: With the emergence of voice as a digital biomarker for various health conditions over the last decade, healthcare institutions are exploring avenues to leverage this technology to improve patient outcomes and clinical workflow efficiencies. Voice analysis technologies have the potential to streamline clinical care from speech-based diagnoses to assessing disease risk. This interest in healthcare innovation must also correspond with an understanding of the scope of ethical concerns and focal points that exist within this emerging literature.
Methods: Given the significant discourse outside traditional ethics journals, we conducted a review of the literature focusing on artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled voice analysis technologies for clinical diagnosis and monitoring purposes to inform the practice of AI ethics scholars, consultants, and instructors. Studies were published between 2010 and 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, OVID Embase, or Google Scholar. We evaluated 1871 articles, with 48 articles included in the final review that explore the ethics of clinical applications.
Results: Clinical applications of these technologies centered around using voice data for diagnosis of pulmonary and neurological conditions, mental health screening, provider decision-making assistance, and remote patient monitoring. Key themes related to ethics included: ethical design and validation; data privacy and security; health equity; trust, transparency, and accountability; alterations to the physicia-patient relationship; and current guidelines and policies.
Conclusions: As healthcare systems work to create policies and best practices for voice analysis technologies, further research is necessary to understand the perspectives of stakeholders who will be essential for the adoption of these technologies.
背景:在过去十年中,随着语音作为各种健康状况的数字生物标志物的出现,医疗机构正在探索利用这项技术来改善患者结果和临床工作流程效率的途径。语音分析技术有可能简化临床护理,从基于语音的诊断到评估疾病风险。这种对医疗保健创新的兴趣也必须与对这一新兴文献中存在的伦理问题和焦点范围的理解相一致。方法:考虑到传统伦理学期刊之外的重要论述,我们对用于临床诊断和监测目的的人工智能(AI)语音分析技术的文献进行了回顾,以告知人工智能伦理学学者、顾问和教师的实践。这些研究在2010年到2023年间发表在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、OVID Embase或b谷歌Scholar上。我们评估了1871篇文章,其中48篇文章被纳入最终综述,探讨了临床应用的伦理问题。结果:这些技术的临床应用主要集中在使用语音数据诊断肺部和神经系统疾病、心理健康筛查、提供者决策协助和远程患者监测。与伦理相关的关键主题包括:伦理设计和验证;数据隐私和安全;卫生公平;信任、透明度和问责制;医患关系的改变;以及现行的指导方针和政策。结论:随着医疗保健系统致力于为语音分析技术制定政策和最佳实践,有必要进一步研究以了解对采用这些技术至关重要的利益相关者的观点。