Insights on accelerometer-measured 24-hour movement behaviour across type 2 diabetes sub-phenotypes in the Asian population.

IF 3
Diabetes & vascular disease research Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-07 DOI:10.1177/14791641261431769
Huili Zheng, Keven Ang, Natarajan Padmapriya, Tsz Kiu Kwan, Mei Chung Moh, Serena Low, Falk Mueller-Riemenschneider, Su Chi Lim
{"title":"Insights on accelerometer-measured 24-hour movement behaviour across type 2 diabetes sub-phenotypes in the Asian population.","authors":"Huili Zheng, Keven Ang, Natarajan Padmapriya, Tsz Kiu Kwan, Mei Chung Moh, Serena Low, Falk Mueller-Riemenschneider, Su Chi Lim","doi":"10.1177/14791641261431769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPreviously, we observed that subgroups of type 2 diabetes (T2D) - mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), mild age-related diabetes (MARD), severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD) - had distinct characteristics and complications. This study aims to investigate if movement behaviour also differs by T2D subgroup. Given that physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of complications, identifying less active subgroups could inform more targeted interventions.MethodsUsing age at T2D onset, body mass index, hbA1c, homeostasis model assessment 2 estimates of beta-cell function and insulin resistance, 706 study participants were classified into T2D subgroups. Using time spent in light PA, moderate-vigorous PA, day inactivity and night sleep per 24-hour, the participants were classified into three profiles. Regression models were used to examine the association between T2D subgroup (exposure) and movement behaviour (outcome).ResultsCompared to MOD, the relative risk ratio (RRR) of having the least active profile was 0.69 (95%CI 0.43-1.10), while the RRR of having the most active profile was 1.53 (95%CI 0.82-2.83) for MARD. The RRRs of having the least and most active profile was 1.32 (95%CI 0.85-2.04) and 1.44 (95%CI 0.76-2.72) respectively for SIRD.ConclusionUnderstanding the relationship between T2D subgroups and movement behaviour is a step towards advocating for PA intervention tailored to each subgroup's unique characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93978,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & vascular disease research","volume":"23 2","pages":"14791641261431769"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & vascular disease research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14791641261431769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionPreviously, we observed that subgroups of type 2 diabetes (T2D) - mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), mild age-related diabetes (MARD), severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD) - had distinct characteristics and complications. This study aims to investigate if movement behaviour also differs by T2D subgroup. Given that physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of complications, identifying less active subgroups could inform more targeted interventions.MethodsUsing age at T2D onset, body mass index, hbA1c, homeostasis model assessment 2 estimates of beta-cell function and insulin resistance, 706 study participants were classified into T2D subgroups. Using time spent in light PA, moderate-vigorous PA, day inactivity and night sleep per 24-hour, the participants were classified into three profiles. Regression models were used to examine the association between T2D subgroup (exposure) and movement behaviour (outcome).ResultsCompared to MOD, the relative risk ratio (RRR) of having the least active profile was 0.69 (95%CI 0.43-1.10), while the RRR of having the most active profile was 1.53 (95%CI 0.82-2.83) for MARD. The RRRs of having the least and most active profile was 1.32 (95%CI 0.85-2.04) and 1.44 (95%CI 0.76-2.72) respectively for SIRD.ConclusionUnderstanding the relationship between T2D subgroups and movement behaviour is a step towards advocating for PA intervention tailored to each subgroup's unique characteristics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

亚洲人群中2型糖尿病亚表型加速计测量的24小时运动行为的见解
之前,我们观察到2型糖尿病(T2D)亚组-轻度肥胖相关糖尿病(MOD),轻度年龄相关糖尿病(MARD),严重胰岛素抵抗型糖尿病(SIRD) -具有不同的特征和并发症。本研究旨在调查运动行为是否也因T2D亚群而异。鉴于体育活动(PA)可以降低并发症的风险,确定运动较少的亚组可以为更有针对性的干预提供信息。方法根据T2D发病年龄、体重指数、hbA1c、稳态模型评估2、β细胞功能和胰岛素抵抗,将706名研究参与者分为T2D亚组。根据每24小时轻度活动、中度剧烈活动、白天不活动和夜间睡眠的时间,参与者被分为三种类型。回归模型用于检验T2D亚组(暴露)与运动行为(结果)之间的关系。结果与MOD相比,最不活跃的相对风险比(RRR)为0.69 (95%CI 0.43 ~ 1.10),最活跃的相对风险比(RRR)为1.53 (95%CI 0.82 ~ 2.83)。对于SIRD,最小和最活跃剖面的rrr分别为1.32 (95%CI 0.85-2.04)和1.44 (95%CI 0.76-2.72)。结论了解T2D亚群与运动行为之间的关系是倡导针对每个亚群独特特征进行PA干预的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书