The assessment of second year chiropractic students' comfort and confidence modifying care for vulnerable patient groups: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Gregory J Snow, Dustin C Derby
{"title":"The assessment of second year chiropractic students' comfort and confidence modifying care for vulnerable patient groups: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Gregory J Snow, Dustin C Derby","doi":"10.7899/JCE-25-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate chiropractic students' comfort and confidence levels in modifying care for vulnerable patient groups. A second aim is to present data on students' self-identification as belonging to one or more of these groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 117 second-year students enrolled in a Special Populations course was conducted. Respondents selected special population groups (SPG) to which they identified as belonging. They rated their comfort interacting with and confidence levels modifying care for each SPG on a 5-point scale. A general patient group (GPG), representing patients not belonging to any SPG, served as a benchmark. Responses were grouped into 3 categories: those lacking comfort or confidence, those unsure or neutral, and those with comfort or confidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comfort and confidence levels were found to be higher for the GPG than the SPG average. Perceptions of a sociocultural vulnerable subgrouping were much closer to GPG than a physically vulnerable subgrouping. Students perceived themselves most comfortable and confident with ethnically, racially, and religiously diverse patient groups and least comfortable and confident with physically and mentally disabled groups. Thirty-seven percent of respondents identified as belonging to one or more SPG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respondents perceived their comfort levels to be higher than their confidence levels. Ratings for sociocultural vulnerable groups were higher than physically vulnerable groups. Gaps between comfort and confidence were higher in the sociocultural subgroup than the physically vulnerable subgroup. A significant minority of students identified as belonging to one or more of the studied groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12970944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-25-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate chiropractic students' comfort and confidence levels in modifying care for vulnerable patient groups. A second aim is to present data on students' self-identification as belonging to one or more of these groups.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 117 second-year students enrolled in a Special Populations course was conducted. Respondents selected special population groups (SPG) to which they identified as belonging. They rated their comfort interacting with and confidence levels modifying care for each SPG on a 5-point scale. A general patient group (GPG), representing patients not belonging to any SPG, served as a benchmark. Responses were grouped into 3 categories: those lacking comfort or confidence, those unsure or neutral, and those with comfort or confidence.

Results: Comfort and confidence levels were found to be higher for the GPG than the SPG average. Perceptions of a sociocultural vulnerable subgrouping were much closer to GPG than a physically vulnerable subgrouping. Students perceived themselves most comfortable and confident with ethnically, racially, and religiously diverse patient groups and least comfortable and confident with physically and mentally disabled groups. Thirty-seven percent of respondents identified as belonging to one or more SPG.

Conclusion: Respondents perceived their comfort levels to be higher than their confidence levels. Ratings for sociocultural vulnerable groups were higher than physically vulnerable groups. Gaps between comfort and confidence were higher in the sociocultural subgroup than the physically vulnerable subgroup. A significant minority of students identified as belonging to one or more of the studied groups.

整脊医二年级学生对弱势病人群体的舒适和信心调整护理的评估:一项横断面调查。
目的:探讨捏脊医学生对弱势患者群体修改护理的舒适度和信心水平。第二个目的是提供学生自我认同属于其中一个或多个群体的数据。方法:对117名特殊人群课程二年级学生进行横断面调查。受访者选择了他们认为属于的特殊人口群体。他们用5分制来评价他们与每个SPG互动的舒适度和修改护理的信心水平。一般患者组(GPG),代表不属于任何SPG的患者,作为基准。回答被分为3类:缺乏安慰或信心的,不确定或中立的,以及安慰或信心的。结果:GPG的舒适度和信心水平高于SPG的平均值。社会文化脆弱亚群的感知比身体脆弱亚群更接近GPG。学生们认为自己对种族、种族和宗教多样化的患者群体最舒服、最自信,对身体和精神残疾的患者群体最不舒服、最不自信。37%的受访者认为自己属于一个或多个SPG。结论:受访者认为他们的舒适水平高于他们的信心水平。社会文化弱势群体的评分高于身体弱势群体。舒适和自信之间的差距在社会文化亚组比身体脆弱的亚组更大。属于一个或多个研究群体的少数学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书