Treatment of Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1111/papr.70144
Marcelo A Rohde, Lorenzo Gabriel A Viera, Aline O S Meneses, Helena F S Rypl, Laura P Nunes, Victor Hugo W Annes, Amauri Dalla-Corte
{"title":"Treatment of Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Marcelo A Rohde, Lorenzo Gabriel A Viera, Aline O S Meneses, Helena F S Rypl, Laura P Nunes, Victor Hugo W Annes, Amauri Dalla-Corte","doi":"10.1111/papr.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a rare neuropathy characterized by paroxysmal, unilateral, and severe pain episodes affecting the throat, tonsils, base of the tongue, and pharynx. Its management remains challenging due to the absence of standardized treatment protocols and the limited availability of high-quality comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review and compare the effectiveness and safety of available treatments for GPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted, analyzing studies published in the last decade that evaluated GPN treatments. Searches were performed in PubMed, SCIELO, and the Regional Portal of BVS. Studies were assessed for quality, risk of bias, and key outcomes, including pain relief and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies, comprising 973 patients, were included. Seven treatment modalities were analyzed. Microvascular decompression (MVD) demonstrated the highest efficacy and durability, with an immediate pain relief rate exceeding 86.7% and exhibiting the lowest recurrence rates. Alternative treatments, including gamma knife radiosurgery, radiofrequency thermocoagulation, and pulsed radiofrequency, showed initial pain relief but had higher recurrence rates over time. The posterior inferior cerebellar artery was the most frequently involved vessel in cases with vascular compression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MVD is the preferred first-line surgical treatment when pharmacological therapy fails, vascular compression is present, and the patient is a suitable candidate for surgery. In cases where MVD is contraindicated or vascular compression is absent, alternative treatments should be considered based on individual patient factors, balancing efficacy and long-term outcomes. Further high-quality studies are needed to refine treatment strategies for GPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"26 3","pages":"e70144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a rare neuropathy characterized by paroxysmal, unilateral, and severe pain episodes affecting the throat, tonsils, base of the tongue, and pharynx. Its management remains challenging due to the absence of standardized treatment protocols and the limited availability of high-quality comparative studies.

Objective: To review and compare the effectiveness and safety of available treatments for GPN.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted, analyzing studies published in the last decade that evaluated GPN treatments. Searches were performed in PubMed, SCIELO, and the Regional Portal of BVS. Studies were assessed for quality, risk of bias, and key outcomes, including pain relief and adverse effects.

Results: Twenty-six studies, comprising 973 patients, were included. Seven treatment modalities were analyzed. Microvascular decompression (MVD) demonstrated the highest efficacy and durability, with an immediate pain relief rate exceeding 86.7% and exhibiting the lowest recurrence rates. Alternative treatments, including gamma knife radiosurgery, radiofrequency thermocoagulation, and pulsed radiofrequency, showed initial pain relief but had higher recurrence rates over time. The posterior inferior cerebellar artery was the most frequently involved vessel in cases with vascular compression.

Conclusion: MVD is the preferred first-line surgical treatment when pharmacological therapy fails, vascular compression is present, and the patient is a suitable candidate for surgery. In cases where MVD is contraindicated or vascular compression is absent, alternative treatments should be considered based on individual patient factors, balancing efficacy and long-term outcomes. Further high-quality studies are needed to refine treatment strategies for GPN.

舌咽神经痛的治疗:系统回顾。
简介:舌咽神经痛(GPN)是一种罕见的神经病变,其特征是发作性、单侧和严重的疼痛发作,影响喉咙、扁桃体、舌根和咽部。由于缺乏标准化的治疗方案和有限的高质量比较研究,其管理仍然具有挑战性。目的:综述和比较GPN现有治疗方法的有效性和安全性。方法:进行系统回顾,分析过去十年发表的评估GPN治疗的研究。在PubMed, SCIELO和BVS的区域门户中进行搜索。评估研究的质量、偏倚风险和主要结局,包括疼痛缓解和不良反应。结果:纳入26项研究,973例患者。分析了7种治疗方式。微血管减压(MVD)的疗效和持久性最高,即刻止痛率超过86.7%,复发率最低。其他治疗方法,包括伽玛刀放射手术、射频热凝和脉冲射频治疗,显示出最初的疼痛缓解,但随着时间的推移,复发率更高。小脑后下动脉是血管受压最常累及的血管。结论:当药物治疗失败,血管受压时,MVD是首选的一线手术治疗方法,适合手术治疗。在MVD禁忌症或没有血管压迫的情况下,应根据患者的个体因素、平衡疗效和长期结果考虑替代治疗。需要进一步的高质量研究来完善GPN的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书