Kathryn T Del Valle, Benjamin Re Harris, Matthew Clark, Kemuel Philbrick, Ellie Cipriani, Patrick Cornelius, Allison M LeMahieu, Phillip Schulte, Kelly Sonsalla, Siva Kamal Guntupalli, Andrea Johnson, Kristin Muir, Lioudmila V Karnatovskaia
{"title":"Development of A Screening Tool to Predict Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) in Critically Ill Adults in a Prospective Cohort.","authors":"Kathryn T Del Valle, Benjamin Re Harris, Matthew Clark, Kemuel Philbrick, Ellie Cipriani, Patrick Cornelius, Allison M LeMahieu, Phillip Schulte, Kelly Sonsalla, Siva Kamal Guntupalli, Andrea Johnson, Kristin Muir, Lioudmila V Karnatovskaia","doi":"10.1177/08850666261425642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeSurvivors of critical illness often acquire significant physical, cognitive, and psychological burdens following their intensive care unit (ICU) stay, termed \"post-intensive care syndrome\" (PICS). Screening for PICS is generally not performed outside of research settings largely due to lack of a simple assessment tool and time constraints.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study at a single academic medical center in the USA. We included adults (18 years or older) who spent greater than 48 h in any ICU within the medical center. Following transfer out of the ICU and at 3 months, psychological, cognitive, and physical functioning were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-blind, and Barthel Index. We compared these validated questionnaires to a brief, 15-item PICS screening tool (5 questions/domain) that was developed by our multidisciplinary study team and administered to study participants after ICU discharge to general care. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the ability of validated screening tools administered at ICU discharge to predict PICS at 3 months and develop a novel screening tool for identifying patients at risk of PICS.Major Findings191 participants completed the initial questionnaire, and 109 (56%) completed the 3-month follow-up. PICS tool scores were compared to 3-month follow-up data from validated questionnaires to evaluate predictive performance. Overall, the screening tool weakly-to-moderately correlated with continuous outcomes of the validated measures at 3-month follow-up. When evaluating sensitivity and specificity for individual domains, the screening tool had an area under curve of >0.7 for all three domains, indicating moderate-to-good sensitivity and specificity.ConclusionsWe developed a brief PICS screening tool that is feasible to use without prior training that modestly predicted the development of PICS following ICU stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1013-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666261425642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeSurvivors of critical illness often acquire significant physical, cognitive, and psychological burdens following their intensive care unit (ICU) stay, termed "post-intensive care syndrome" (PICS). Screening for PICS is generally not performed outside of research settings largely due to lack of a simple assessment tool and time constraints.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study at a single academic medical center in the USA. We included adults (18 years or older) who spent greater than 48 h in any ICU within the medical center. Following transfer out of the ICU and at 3 months, psychological, cognitive, and physical functioning were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-blind, and Barthel Index. We compared these validated questionnaires to a brief, 15-item PICS screening tool (5 questions/domain) that was developed by our multidisciplinary study team and administered to study participants after ICU discharge to general care. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the ability of validated screening tools administered at ICU discharge to predict PICS at 3 months and develop a novel screening tool for identifying patients at risk of PICS.Major Findings191 participants completed the initial questionnaire, and 109 (56%) completed the 3-month follow-up. PICS tool scores were compared to 3-month follow-up data from validated questionnaires to evaluate predictive performance. Overall, the screening tool weakly-to-moderately correlated with continuous outcomes of the validated measures at 3-month follow-up. When evaluating sensitivity and specificity for individual domains, the screening tool had an area under curve of >0.7 for all three domains, indicating moderate-to-good sensitivity and specificity.ConclusionsWe developed a brief PICS screening tool that is feasible to use without prior training that modestly predicted the development of PICS following ICU stay.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.