Early Multimodal Assessment for Prediction of Cerebral Palsy in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-06 DOI:10.1055/a-2826-4512
Fatih Isleyen, Canan Kocaman, Asli Okbay Gunes, Mehmet Fatih Deveci, Celil Yilmaz, Arzu Yilmaz, Gazanfer Ekinci, Ipek Akman
{"title":"Early Multimodal Assessment for Prediction of Cerebral Palsy in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.","authors":"Fatih Isleyen, Canan Kocaman, Asli Okbay Gunes, Mehmet Fatih Deveci, Celil Yilmaz, Arzu Yilmaz, Gazanfer Ekinci, Ipek Akman","doi":"10.1055/a-2826-4512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG), the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE), and the General Movements Assessment (GMA) for cerebral palsy (CP) in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and to evaluate whether combining these modalities improves diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this prospective two-center cohort study, 53 term or late-preterm infants with HIE treated with standardized therapeutic hypothermia (33.5°C for 72 hours) were evaluated. aEEG and MRI findings were compared with concurrent HNNE and GMA results. CP was diagnosed during follow-up by a pediatric neurologist blinded to neonatal data. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic curves and multivariable logistic regression according to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CP developed in 11 infants (20.8%). aEEG showed the highest predictive accuracy (area under the curve = 0.816 [95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.98]), and abnormal aEEG independently predicted CP (odds ratio = 18.5, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The combined \"MRI or aEEG abnormal\" model achieved the best overall accuracy (86.8%), with sensitivity = 90.9% and negative predictive value = 97.3%. MRI and HNNE had moderate predictive value, whereas GMA showed high specificity but low sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>aEEG emerged as a robust and independent early biomarker for CP prediction after HIE. Combining aEEG with MRI substantially enhanced diagnostic precision, reflecting complementary functional and structural brain injury mechanisms. Although HNNE and GMA add screening value, they are insufficient alone. Standardized multimodal protocols integrating structural (MRI), functional (aEEG), and clinical (HNNE-GMA) assessments should be incorporated into clinical practice to improve early prognostication and guide neuroprotective interventions.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Early multimodal tools improve CP prediction.. · MRI and aEEG show higher diagnostic accuracy.. · Low HNNE scores indicate increased CP risk.. · Abnormal GMA supports early neurological impairment.. · Combining MRI + GMA + HNNE enhances prediction..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1767-1774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2826-4512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG), the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE), and the General Movements Assessment (GMA) for cerebral palsy (CP) in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and to evaluate whether combining these modalities improves diagnostic accuracy.

Study design: In this prospective two-center cohort study, 53 term or late-preterm infants with HIE treated with standardized therapeutic hypothermia (33.5°C for 72 hours) were evaluated. aEEG and MRI findings were compared with concurrent HNNE and GMA results. CP was diagnosed during follow-up by a pediatric neurologist blinded to neonatal data. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic curves and multivariable logistic regression according to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.

Results: CP developed in 11 infants (20.8%). aEEG showed the highest predictive accuracy (area under the curve = 0.816 [95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.98]), and abnormal aEEG independently predicted CP (odds ratio = 18.5, p = 0.004). The combined "MRI or aEEG abnormal" model achieved the best overall accuracy (86.8%), with sensitivity = 90.9% and negative predictive value = 97.3%. MRI and HNNE had moderate predictive value, whereas GMA showed high specificity but low sensitivity.

Conclusion: aEEG emerged as a robust and independent early biomarker for CP prediction after HIE. Combining aEEG with MRI substantially enhanced diagnostic precision, reflecting complementary functional and structural brain injury mechanisms. Although HNNE and GMA add screening value, they are insufficient alone. Standardized multimodal protocols integrating structural (MRI), functional (aEEG), and clinical (HNNE-GMA) assessments should be incorporated into clinical practice to improve early prognostication and guide neuroprotective interventions.

Key points: · Early multimodal tools improve CP prediction.. · MRI and aEEG show higher diagnostic accuracy.. · Low HNNE scores indicate increased CP risk.. · Abnormal GMA supports early neurological impairment.. · Combining MRI + GMA + HNNE enhances prediction..

预测新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病脑瘫的早期多模态评估。
目的:探讨磁共振成像(MRI)、波幅积分脑电图(aEEG)、Hammersmith新生儿神经系统检查(HNNE)和一般运动评估(GMA)对新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)脑瘫(CP)的预测价值,并评价联合使用这些方法是否能提高诊断准确性。研究设计:在这项前瞻性双中心队列研究中,对53例HIE足月或晚早产儿进行了标准化治疗性低温(33.5°C, 72小时)治疗。将aEEG和MRI结果与同期HNNE和GMA结果进行比较。CP是由一名不了解新生儿数据的儿科神经科医生在随访期间诊断的。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和多变量logistic回归,根据STROBE指南分析诊断效果。结果:CP发生11例(20.8%)。aEEG预测准确率最高(AUC = 0.816 [95% CI 0.65 ~ 0.98]),异常aEEG独立预测CP (OR = 18.5, p = 0.004)。“MRI或aEEG联合异常”模型总体准确率最高(86.8%),敏感性为90.9%,阴性预测值为97.3%。MRI和HNNE具有中等预测价值,而GMA具有高特异性但低敏感性。结论:aEEG是预测HIE后脑电图的可靠且独立的早期生物标志物。aEEG与MRI的结合大大提高了诊断精度,反映了互补的功能性和结构性脑损伤机制。虽然HNNE和GMA增加了筛选价值,但单独使用是不够的。整合结构(MRI)、功能(aEEG)和临床(HNNE-GMA)评估的标准化多模式方案应纳入临床实践,以改善早期预后并指导神经保护干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书