Emmanuel Allory, Marion Delaurens, Ronan Garlantézec, Rémi Gagnayre
{"title":"Self-management interventions in primary care practices in France between 2010 and 2022: a descriptive national study.","authors":"Emmanuel Allory, Marion Delaurens, Ronan Garlantézec, Rémi Gagnayre","doi":"10.1017/S1463423626100929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our objective was to describe the self-management intervention (SMI) programmes carried out in primary care practices (PCPs) in France between 2010 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>SMIs are included in the recommendations for chronic disease management, but access remains inequal. Primary care has been identified as a favourable setting for their development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In partnership with the French Ministry of Health Office of Non-Communicable Diseases, we contacted all Regional Health Agencies (<i>n</i> = 18) to collect the following information from the self-management programme forms: year of authorization/declaration, SMI type, administrative structure, self-management and coordination team, and programme content.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>At the 13 participating Regional Health Agencies, we identified 4,922 SMI programmes among which 18% (<i>n</i> = 889) were developed in primary care settings and 5.5% (<i>n</i> = 271) in PCPs. Among the 127 forms on SMI programmes at PCPs (2.6%), multi-professional PCPs (57.5%, <i>n</i> = 73) and healthcare centres (25.9%, <i>n</i> = 33) were the most represented. All programmes had a coordinator (mostly general practitioners, 34.7%, <i>n</i> = 24) among whom 69.7% (<i>n</i> = 69) were trained in coordination. The self-management team included a mean of 8.1 (5.5) primary care providers. The main themes were diabetes (34.6%, <i>n</i> = 44), diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (15.6%, <i>n</i> = 20), and cardiovascular disease (10.2%, <i>n</i> = 13). In France, self-management programmes in PCPs are still rare, lack a multimorbidity approach, and are carried out mainly in PCPs with inter-professional collaboration. A qualitative study to identify the barriers and levers to SMI programmes in PCPs may be particularly relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"27 ","pages":"e34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12979017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423626100929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Our objective was to describe the self-management intervention (SMI) programmes carried out in primary care practices (PCPs) in France between 2010 and 2022.
Background: SMIs are included in the recommendations for chronic disease management, but access remains inequal. Primary care has been identified as a favourable setting for their development.
Methods: In partnership with the French Ministry of Health Office of Non-Communicable Diseases, we contacted all Regional Health Agencies (n = 18) to collect the following information from the self-management programme forms: year of authorization/declaration, SMI type, administrative structure, self-management and coordination team, and programme content.
Findings: At the 13 participating Regional Health Agencies, we identified 4,922 SMI programmes among which 18% (n = 889) were developed in primary care settings and 5.5% (n = 271) in PCPs. Among the 127 forms on SMI programmes at PCPs (2.6%), multi-professional PCPs (57.5%, n = 73) and healthcare centres (25.9%, n = 33) were the most represented. All programmes had a coordinator (mostly general practitioners, 34.7%, n = 24) among whom 69.7% (n = 69) were trained in coordination. The self-management team included a mean of 8.1 (5.5) primary care providers. The main themes were diabetes (34.6%, n = 44), diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (15.6%, n = 20), and cardiovascular disease (10.2%, n = 13). In France, self-management programmes in PCPs are still rare, lack a multimorbidity approach, and are carried out mainly in PCPs with inter-professional collaboration. A qualitative study to identify the barriers and levers to SMI programmes in PCPs may be particularly relevant.