Bridging the gap: understanding participation barriers in ALS clinical trials through on-the-ground insights.

IF 2.8
Erica Scirocco, Allison Pogemiller Bulat, Judith R Carey, Elisa Giacomelli, Danielle Boyce, Sabrina Paganoni, James D Berry
{"title":"Bridging the gap: understanding participation barriers in ALS clinical trials through on-the-ground insights.","authors":"Erica Scirocco, Allison Pogemiller Bulat, Judith R Carey, Elisa Giacomelli, Danielle Boyce, Sabrina Paganoni, James D Berry","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2026.2640126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores the experiences and perceptions of people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (pALS), their caregivers, and healthcare providers regarding participation in clinical trials. The study tested the hypothesis, based on existing literature, that geographic distance from multidisciplinary ALS clinics is the primary barrier to awareness and participation in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A road trip was conducted to engage individuals, particularly those residing more than 90 miles from specialized clinics. Qualitative and semi-quantitative methods were used to collect data from in-person interviews conducted with pALS, their caregivers, and healthcare providers in urban (high population density), suburban (residential areas on the outskirts of urban centers), and rural (sparsely populated) settings across the East Coast of the US. Thematic analysis was employed to interpret the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the interviews, a trusted, supportive, and knowledgeable medical team knowledgeable about ALS research emerged as a critical factor influencing patient participation decisions. Geographic distance alone did not meaningfully impact research interest or awareness. Healthcare providers faced challenges, including time constraints and limited access to updated information about studies, which hindered their ability to promote participation. Healthcare providers cited informal partnerships with advocacy organizations and research centers as crucial for facilitating research participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tailored communication strategies that leverage established relationships between pALS and their trusted healthcare providers may enhance research participation. As decentralized research models evolve, improving trial education and access and fostering knowledge and trust could significantly boost enrollment in ALS clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"696-703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2026.2640126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explores the experiences and perceptions of people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (pALS), their caregivers, and healthcare providers regarding participation in clinical trials. The study tested the hypothesis, based on existing literature, that geographic distance from multidisciplinary ALS clinics is the primary barrier to awareness and participation in clinical trials.

Methods: A road trip was conducted to engage individuals, particularly those residing more than 90 miles from specialized clinics. Qualitative and semi-quantitative methods were used to collect data from in-person interviews conducted with pALS, their caregivers, and healthcare providers in urban (high population density), suburban (residential areas on the outskirts of urban centers), and rural (sparsely populated) settings across the East Coast of the US. Thematic analysis was employed to interpret the data.

Results: Based on the interviews, a trusted, supportive, and knowledgeable medical team knowledgeable about ALS research emerged as a critical factor influencing patient participation decisions. Geographic distance alone did not meaningfully impact research interest or awareness. Healthcare providers faced challenges, including time constraints and limited access to updated information about studies, which hindered their ability to promote participation. Healthcare providers cited informal partnerships with advocacy organizations and research centers as crucial for facilitating research participation.

Conclusions: Tailored communication strategies that leverage established relationships between pALS and their trusted healthcare providers may enhance research participation. As decentralized research models evolve, improving trial education and access and fostering knowledge and trust could significantly boost enrollment in ALS clinical research.

弥合差距:通过实地观察了解参与ALS临床试验的障碍。
目的:本研究探讨肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(pALS)患者及其护理人员和医疗保健提供者参与临床试验的经验和看法。基于现有文献,该研究验证了一个假设,即与多学科ALS诊所的地理距离是意识和参与临床试验的主要障碍。方法:进行了一次公路旅行,以吸引个人,特别是那些居住在离专业诊所90英里以上的人。采用定性和半定量方法收集来自美国东海岸城市(高人口密度)、郊区(城市中心郊区的住宅区)和农村(人口稀少)地区的pal、其护理人员和医疗保健提供者的面对面访谈数据。采用主题分析对数据进行解释。结果:基于访谈,一个值得信赖、支持和知识渊博的了解ALS研究的医疗团队成为影响患者参与决策的关键因素。地理距离本身不会对研究兴趣或意识产生有意义的影响。医疗保健提供者面临挑战,包括时间限制和获取最新研究信息的机会有限,这阻碍了他们促进参与的能力。医疗保健提供者指出,与倡导组织和研究中心的非正式伙伴关系对于促进研究参与至关重要。结论:利用pALS与其信任的医疗保健提供者之间已建立的关系的量身定制的沟通策略可能会提高研究参与度。随着分散研究模式的发展,改善试验教育和获取途径,培养知识和信任,可以显著提高ALS临床研究的入学率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书