Simulation-based training in ultrasound-guided pediatric central venous catheterization for anesthesiology residents: transfer to the clinical setting.

IF 3.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
M P Bravo, S Silva, V Contreras, K Azagra, D Barra, M Corvetto
{"title":"Simulation-based training in ultrasound-guided pediatric central venous catheterization for anesthesiology residents: transfer to the clinical setting.","authors":"M P Bravo, S Silva, V Contreras, K Azagra, D Barra, M Corvetto","doi":"10.1186/s41077-026-00428-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation-based training (SBT) for central venous catheter (CVC) placement has been shown to improve procedural performance, reduce the number of attempts, and increase success rates. However, training for specific populations, such as pediatric patients, remains challenging. Moreover, evidence regarding the transfer of simulation-acquired skills to real clinical practice is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the transfer of skills acquired by anesthesiology residents following SBT in ultrasound-guided pediatric CVC placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional ethics committee approval, 21 anesthesiology residents were recruited to participate in an SBT program for ultrasound-guided pediatric CVC insertion. The training consisted of six individual one-hour weekly sessions with direct expert feedback, using a pediatric-specific Blue Phantom® simulation model. Pre-and post-training assessments (PRE and POST) were conducted using video-recorded procedures and evaluated by two blinded assessors using a validated Global Rating Scale (GRS). In addition, hand motion metrics were collected using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD), including total path length (TPL), number of movements (NM), and total procedure time (TPT). To assess skill transfer, the same evaluation protocol was applied during CVC insertion in pediatric patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen residents completed the training and both PRE and POST assessments. Median GRS scores improved significantly from 34 (interquartile range [IQR], 29.5-38.0) at PRE to 47 (IQR, 44.5-47.5) at POST. Total procedure time decreased significantly from 349.4 (IQR, 264-536) to 290.2 (IQR, 232-335) seconds. No significant differences were observed in total path length or number of movements. Regarding transfer to clinical practice, 13 of 15 residents successfully completed the procedure on their first attempt in real patients. Comparison between the POST simulation assessment and the real-patient assessment showed no significant differences in median GRS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-based training significantly improved anesthesiology residents' performance in simulated ultrasound-guided pediatric CVC placement. Although not all residents were able to successfully complete the procedure in real patients, the findings suggest a potential transfer of skills acquired through simulation to clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12961813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00428-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation-based training (SBT) for central venous catheter (CVC) placement has been shown to improve procedural performance, reduce the number of attempts, and increase success rates. However, training for specific populations, such as pediatric patients, remains challenging. Moreover, evidence regarding the transfer of simulation-acquired skills to real clinical practice is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the transfer of skills acquired by anesthesiology residents following SBT in ultrasound-guided pediatric CVC placement.

Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, 21 anesthesiology residents were recruited to participate in an SBT program for ultrasound-guided pediatric CVC insertion. The training consisted of six individual one-hour weekly sessions with direct expert feedback, using a pediatric-specific Blue Phantom® simulation model. Pre-and post-training assessments (PRE and POST) were conducted using video-recorded procedures and evaluated by two blinded assessors using a validated Global Rating Scale (GRS). In addition, hand motion metrics were collected using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD), including total path length (TPL), number of movements (NM), and total procedure time (TPT). To assess skill transfer, the same evaluation protocol was applied during CVC insertion in pediatric patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

Results: Fifteen residents completed the training and both PRE and POST assessments. Median GRS scores improved significantly from 34 (interquartile range [IQR], 29.5-38.0) at PRE to 47 (IQR, 44.5-47.5) at POST. Total procedure time decreased significantly from 349.4 (IQR, 264-536) to 290.2 (IQR, 232-335) seconds. No significant differences were observed in total path length or number of movements. Regarding transfer to clinical practice, 13 of 15 residents successfully completed the procedure on their first attempt in real patients. Comparison between the POST simulation assessment and the real-patient assessment showed no significant differences in median GRS scores.

Conclusions: Simulation-based training significantly improved anesthesiology residents' performance in simulated ultrasound-guided pediatric CVC placement. Although not all residents were able to successfully complete the procedure in real patients, the findings suggest a potential transfer of skills acquired through simulation to clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超声引导下麻醉住院医师儿科中心静脉置管的模拟训练:转移到临床环境。
导论:中心静脉导管(CVC)放置的模拟训练(SBT)已被证明可以改善手术表现,减少尝试次数,提高成功率。然而,针对特定人群(如儿科患者)的培训仍然具有挑战性。此外,关于模拟获得的技能转移到真正的临床实践的证据是有限的。本研究的目的是评估麻醉住院医师在超声引导下进行SBT后获得的技能转移。方法:经机构伦理委员会批准,招募21名麻醉科住院医师参与超声引导下儿科CVC插入的SBT项目。该培训包括六次单独的每周一小时的课程,使用儿科专用的Blue Phantom®模拟模型,并有直接的专家反馈。培训前和培训后评估(PRE和POST)采用视频记录程序进行,并由两名盲法评估员使用经过验证的全球评定量表(GRS)进行评估。此外,使用帝国理工学院手术评估装置(ICSAD)收集手部运动指标,包括总路径长度(TPL)、运动次数(NM)和总手术时间(TPT)。为了评估技能转移,在接受择期心脏手术的儿科患者的CVC插入过程中采用了相同的评估方案。结果:15名住院医师完成了培训并完成了PRE和POST评估。中位GRS评分从PRE的34分(四分位间距[IQR], 29.5-38.0)显著提高到POST的47分(IQR, 44.5-47.5)。总手术时间从349.4秒(IQR, 264-536)减少到290.2秒(IQR, 232-335)。在总路径长度或运动次数上没有观察到显著差异。至于转移到临床实践,15名住院医生中有13人在第一次尝试真正的病人时成功完成了手术。POST模拟评估与真实患者评估的比较显示,中位GRS评分无显著差异。结论:基于模拟的训练显著提高了麻醉科住院医师在模拟超声引导下的儿科CVC安置中的表现。虽然不是所有的住院医生都能成功地在真实的病人身上完成这个过程,但研究结果表明,通过模拟获得的技能有可能转移到临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书