Effects of home-based cardiac rehabilitation integrated in the cardiac care bridge transitional care program on the physical functioning of older patients who are frail: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Michel S Terbraak, Lotte Verweij, Patricia Jepma, Marike van der Schaaf, Harald T Jørstad, Ron J G Peters, Bianca M Buurman, Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer
{"title":"Effects of home-based cardiac rehabilitation integrated in the cardiac care bridge transitional care program on the physical functioning of older patients who are frail: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.","authors":"Michel S Terbraak, Lotte Verweij, Patricia Jepma, Marike van der Schaaf, Harald T Jørstad, Ron J G Peters, Bianca M Buurman, Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzag020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Older patients hospitalized for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at risk of physical function decline and adverse health outcomes. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves physical functioning but is underutilized by older patients. Home-based CR potentially improves utilization, yet its effectiveness in older patients who are frail remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of a transitional-care integrated home-based CR program on physical functioning in older patients who are frail after CVD hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a prespecified secondary analysis of physical functioning at the 6-month follow-up in the cardiac care bridge multicenter randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A home-based setting was used.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study participants were patients who were frail and ≥70 years old after CVD hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention was transitional care followed by physical therapist led home-based CR and community nurse visits.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary physical function outcome was the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) in cases with complete follow-up data. Secondary outcomes included the 2-min step test, grip strength, and Amsterdam Linear Disability Scale. Sensitivity analyses included an intention-to-treat analysis by multiple imputation of the full cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 85 of 153 participants in the intervention group and 85 of 153 participants in the control group were analyzed (mean age = 82.6 [SD = 6.3] years; 46% men; median of 2 [interquartile range = 1-4] comorbidities). At the 6-month follow-up, more participants in the intervention group than in the control group demonstrated SPPB improvement (61% vs 51%) or maintenance (29% vs 12%), and fewer deteriorated (11% vs 37%). The mean SPPB values at 6 months were 6.3 (SD = 0.3) and 5.5 (SD = 0.2), respectively, with a mean difference of 0.8 (95% CI = 0.0-1.6), favoring the intervention group. No between-group differences were observed in the 2-min step test, grip strength, or Amsterdam Linear Disability Scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among older patients who were frail and had CVD, a comprehensive transitional-care program with integrated home-based CR resulted in clinically relevant improvements in physical functioning.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>The results substantiate the effectiveness of home-based CR in older patients who are frail and have CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13064644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzag020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Older patients hospitalized for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at risk of physical function decline and adverse health outcomes. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves physical functioning but is underutilized by older patients. Home-based CR potentially improves utilization, yet its effectiveness in older patients who are frail remains understudied.

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of a transitional-care integrated home-based CR program on physical functioning in older patients who are frail after CVD hospitalization.

Design: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of physical functioning at the 6-month follow-up in the cardiac care bridge multicenter randomized trial.

Setting: A home-based setting was used.

Participants: The study participants were patients who were frail and ≥70 years old after CVD hospitalization.

Intervention: The intervention was transitional care followed by physical therapist led home-based CR and community nurse visits.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary physical function outcome was the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) in cases with complete follow-up data. Secondary outcomes included the 2-min step test, grip strength, and Amsterdam Linear Disability Scale. Sensitivity analyses included an intention-to-treat analysis by multiple imputation of the full cohort.

Results: In total, 85 of 153 participants in the intervention group and 85 of 153 participants in the control group were analyzed (mean age = 82.6 [SD = 6.3] years; 46% men; median of 2 [interquartile range = 1-4] comorbidities). At the 6-month follow-up, more participants in the intervention group than in the control group demonstrated SPPB improvement (61% vs 51%) or maintenance (29% vs 12%), and fewer deteriorated (11% vs 37%). The mean SPPB values at 6 months were 6.3 (SD = 0.3) and 5.5 (SD = 0.2), respectively, with a mean difference of 0.8 (95% CI = 0.0-1.6), favoring the intervention group. No between-group differences were observed in the 2-min step test, grip strength, or Amsterdam Linear Disability Scale.

Conclusions: Among older patients who were frail and had CVD, a comprehensive transitional-care program with integrated home-based CR resulted in clinically relevant improvements in physical functioning.

Relevance: The results substantiate the effectiveness of home-based CR in older patients who are frail and have CVD.

以家庭为基础的心脏康复纳入心脏护理桥过渡护理计划对老年虚弱患者身体功能的影响:一项随机试验的二次分析
重要性:因心血管疾病(CVD)住院的老年患者存在身体功能下降和不良健康结局的风险。心脏康复(CR)改善身体功能,但未被老年患者充分利用。以家庭为基础的CR可能提高利用率,但其对年老体弱患者的有效性仍有待进一步研究。目的:本研究的目的是探讨过渡护理综合家庭CR计划对心血管疾病住院后体弱的老年患者身体功能的影响。设计:这是在心脏护理桥多中心随机试验中预先指定的6个月随访期间身体功能的二次分析。设置:使用基于家庭的设置。参与者:研究参与者为心血管疾病住院后体弱且年龄≥70岁的患者。干预:干预是过渡护理,然后是物理治疗师带领的家庭CR和社区护士访问。主要观察指标:随访数据完整的患者,主要生理功能观察指标为短时间体能性能电池(SPPB)。次要结果包括2分钟步幅测试、握力和阿姆斯特丹线性残疾量表。敏感性分析包括对整个队列进行多重归算的意向治疗分析。结果:干预组153例患者中有85例,对照组153例患者中有85例(平均年龄82.6 [SD = 6.3]岁;男性46%;共2例(四分位间距= 1-4)共患病中位数)。在6个月的随访中,干预组比对照组有更多的参与者表现出SPPB改善(61%对51%)或维持(29%对12%),更少的参与者恶化(11%对37%)。6个月时SPPB平均值分别为6.3 (SD = 0.3)和5.5 (SD = 0.2),平均差异为0.8 (95% CI = 0.0 ~ 1.6),干预组优于对照组。在2分钟步幅测试、握力或阿姆斯特丹线性残疾量表中没有观察到组间差异。结论:在身体虚弱且患有心血管疾病的老年患者中,综合的过渡护理方案结合以家庭为基础的CR可导致临床相关的身体功能改善。相关性:结果证实了以家庭为基础的CR对体弱和有心血管疾病的老年患者的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书