Jodi Summers Holtrop, Dennis Gurfinkel, Vanessa Owen, Douglas H Fernald, Lakshmi Karra, Patrick Hosokawa, Shandra Brown Levey, Lauren Tolle, Jay Shore
{"title":"Practice Members' Perspectives on the Implementation of Colorado Integrated Behavioral Health Plus (CIBH +).","authors":"Jodi Summers Holtrop, Dennis Gurfinkel, Vanessa Owen, Douglas H Fernald, Lakshmi Karra, Patrick Hosokawa, Shandra Brown Levey, Lauren Tolle, Jay Shore","doi":"10.1007/s10880-026-10134-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrated Behavioral Health is a key solution in addressing significant problems of access and quality of care. This study assessed practice members' perspectives on the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of an integrated care model called Colorado Integrated Behavioral Health Plus (CIBH +) in a large integrated health system. Seven family medicine practices implemented CIBH + . Practice members completed surveys regarding feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness (analyzed with descriptive statistics) and semi-structured interviews (analyzed using a grounded theory hermeneutic editing approach). A total of 156 practice members responded to the survey (62% response rate) and 46 participated in interviews (78% response rate). Respondents indicated high levels of agreement about the perceived feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of CIBH + . Qualitative themes included: (1) observing the benefits to patients and comprehensive team care reinforced the value of integrating care; (2) supports from teamwork, leadership, and telehealth facilitated implementation; and (3) limitations from role clarity, staffing, space, telehealth, and lack of long-term care options remained challenging for implementation. Identifying the key features of CIBH + may make practical implementation in other settings more feasible to implement and acceptable for patients and care teams to use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":"431-442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13582135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-026-10134-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Integrated Behavioral Health is a key solution in addressing significant problems of access and quality of care. This study assessed practice members' perspectives on the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of an integrated care model called Colorado Integrated Behavioral Health Plus (CIBH +) in a large integrated health system. Seven family medicine practices implemented CIBH + . Practice members completed surveys regarding feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness (analyzed with descriptive statistics) and semi-structured interviews (analyzed using a grounded theory hermeneutic editing approach). A total of 156 practice members responded to the survey (62% response rate) and 46 participated in interviews (78% response rate). Respondents indicated high levels of agreement about the perceived feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of CIBH + . Qualitative themes included: (1) observing the benefits to patients and comprehensive team care reinforced the value of integrating care; (2) supports from teamwork, leadership, and telehealth facilitated implementation; and (3) limitations from role clarity, staffing, space, telehealth, and lack of long-term care options remained challenging for implementation. Identifying the key features of CIBH + may make practical implementation in other settings more feasible to implement and acceptable for patients and care teams to use.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.