Comparative efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in prevention of adverse cardiovascular events: a network meta-analysis.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Morvarid Taebi, Parisa Fallahtafti, Nasim Kakavand, Soroush Nematollahi, Yasaman Daryabari, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Kaveh Hosseini
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in prevention of adverse cardiovascular events: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Morvarid Taebi, Parisa Fallahtafti, Nasim Kakavand, Soroush Nematollahi, Yasaman Daryabari, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Kaveh Hosseini","doi":"10.1007/s10741-026-10594-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) potentially reduce adverse cardiovascular events by modulating proinflammatory signaling pathways. However, their efficacy varies across agents and clinical populations. We compared the efficacy of different MRAs in reducing composite adverse cardiovascular events. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central up to 13 May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for composite adverse cardiovascular events comparing MRAs with placebo, another MRA, or non-MRA users. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis with P-score rankings was conducted, including subgroup analyses by clinical condition. Twenty-five study analyses (from 16 RCTs and 6 observational cohorts; 54,964 patients; mean age 66.1 ± 10.7 years; 65.1% male) with 4–44 months follow-up were included. All MRAs were effective in preventing composite adverse cardiovascular events. Eplerenone was most effective compared to control (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.64–0.88), with consistent effects in subgroups with chronic kidney disease (HR: 0.62) and diabetes mellitus (HR: 0.54). Spironolactone was most effective in patients with heart failure (HF, HR: 0.70), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR: 0.66), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HR: 0.73), and without HF (HR: 0.40). Head-to-head comparisons indicated eplerenone’s superiority over finerenone in the overall population and finerenone’s inferiority in non-HF patients. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results, except for HFpEF, where finerenone showed greatest efficacy. MRAs reduce composite adverse cardiovascular events across populations. Eplerenone and spironolactone appear most effective, while finerenone offers comparable benefits in select contexts, warranting future direct head-to-head trials to optimize agent selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-026-10594-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) potentially reduce adverse cardiovascular events by modulating proinflammatory signaling pathways. However, their efficacy varies across agents and clinical populations. We compared the efficacy of different MRAs in reducing composite adverse cardiovascular events. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central up to 13 May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for composite adverse cardiovascular events comparing MRAs with placebo, another MRA, or non-MRA users. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis with P-score rankings was conducted, including subgroup analyses by clinical condition. Twenty-five study analyses (from 16 RCTs and 6 observational cohorts; 54,964 patients; mean age 66.1 ± 10.7 years; 65.1% male) with 4–44 months follow-up were included. All MRAs were effective in preventing composite adverse cardiovascular events. Eplerenone was most effective compared to control (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.64–0.88), with consistent effects in subgroups with chronic kidney disease (HR: 0.62) and diabetes mellitus (HR: 0.54). Spironolactone was most effective in patients with heart failure (HF, HR: 0.70), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR: 0.66), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HR: 0.73), and without HF (HR: 0.40). Head-to-head comparisons indicated eplerenone’s superiority over finerenone in the overall population and finerenone’s inferiority in non-HF patients. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results, except for HFpEF, where finerenone showed greatest efficacy. MRAs reduce composite adverse cardiovascular events across populations. Eplerenone and spironolactone appear most effective, while finerenone offers comparable benefits in select contexts, warranting future direct head-to-head trials to optimize agent selection.

矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂预防心血管不良事件的比较疗效:网络荟萃分析。
矿化皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)可能通过调节促炎信号通路减少不良心血管事件。然而,它们的功效因药物和临床人群而异。我们比较了不同mra在减少复合心血管不良事件方面的疗效。我们系统地检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Central,检索了截至2025年5月13日的随机对照试验(rct)或队列研究,以报告MRA与安慰剂、另一种MRA或非MRA使用者的复合心血管不良事件的危险比(hr)。采用频率随机效应网络meta分析p评分排序,包括临床情况亚组分析。纳入25项研究分析(来自16项随机对照试验和6个观察性队列;54,964例患者;平均年龄66.1±10.7岁;65.1%男性),随访4-44个月。所有mra在预防复合心血管不良事件方面均有效。与对照组相比,依普利酮最有效(HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.64-0.88),在慢性肾病(HR: 0.62)和糖尿病(HR: 0.54)亚组中效果一致。螺内酯对心力衰竭(HF, HR: 0.70)、射血分数降低的HF (HR: 0.66)、保留射血分数的HF (HR: 0.73)和无HF (HR: 0.40)患者最为有效。头对头比较显示eperenone在总体人群中优于finerenone,而finerenone在非hf患者中的劣效性。敏感性分析得出了一致的结果,除了HFpEF,芬烯酮显示出最大的疗效。MRAs减少了人群中的复合心血管不良事件。依普利酮和螺内酯似乎是最有效的,而芬尼酮在某些情况下也有类似的疗效,因此需要未来的直接正面试验来优化药物选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书