Partial pictures: what routine health data can and cannot tell us about the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jil Molenaar, Amani Kikula, Zamoyoni Julius, Claudia Hanson, Josefien van Olmen, Andrea Barnabas Pembe, Lenka Beňová
{"title":"Partial pictures: what routine health data can and cannot tell us about the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania.","authors":"Jil Molenaar, Amani Kikula, Zamoyoni Julius, Claudia Hanson, Josefien van Olmen, Andrea Barnabas Pembe, Lenka Beňová","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czag030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement of contact coverage of maternal and newborn health services may overestimate the benefits of the care that is provided, because the quality of care is not captured. It is therefore important to better understand the opportunities and challenges of capturing elements of care quality in routine health information systems (RHIS). This study explored healthcare workers' (HCWs), health sector managers' and policymakers' perspectives on the value and limits of routine health data to understand the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania. We conducted qualitative research during two periods to capture perspectives across facility, district, regional and national levels. In Mtwara region in 2023, we conducted ethnographic observations at two hospital labour wards and 29 in-depth interviews with healthcare workers, hospital leaders, and district/regional managers. In 2025, we carried out 17 additional interviews with regional managers in Mtwara and with key national-level stakeholders. Our findings demonstrate that Tanzania's RHIS provides a valuable but partial picture of quality of care for maternal and neonatal health services. Care processes-including both provision and experience of care-are captured only to a limited extent. Using boundary object theory, we highlight how the same health information must serve diverse stakeholder needs. While there are opportunities to integrate more quality-of-care indicators, standardized RHIS cannot be expected to comprehensively capture the multifaceted nature of care quality. For quality measurement to support meaningful local health service improvement, a flexible, bottom-up approach is essential. However, the current emphasis on top-down oversight acts as a barrier for local-level data use. Relevant and feasible measurement of the quality of facility-based care requires a fundamental shift in current RHIS priorities-from systems that extract data for those 'up there' to platforms that also create value for those who provide care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"747-760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of contact coverage of maternal and newborn health services may overestimate the benefits of the care that is provided, because the quality of care is not captured. It is therefore important to better understand the opportunities and challenges of capturing elements of care quality in routine health information systems (RHIS). This study explored healthcare workers' (HCWs), health sector managers' and policymakers' perspectives on the value and limits of routine health data to understand the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania. We conducted qualitative research during two periods to capture perspectives across facility, district, regional and national levels. In Mtwara region in 2023, we conducted ethnographic observations at two hospital labour wards and 29 in-depth interviews with healthcare workers, hospital leaders, and district/regional managers. In 2025, we carried out 17 additional interviews with regional managers in Mtwara and with key national-level stakeholders. Our findings demonstrate that Tanzania's RHIS provides a valuable but partial picture of quality of care for maternal and neonatal health services. Care processes-including both provision and experience of care-are captured only to a limited extent. Using boundary object theory, we highlight how the same health information must serve diverse stakeholder needs. While there are opportunities to integrate more quality-of-care indicators, standardized RHIS cannot be expected to comprehensively capture the multifaceted nature of care quality. For quality measurement to support meaningful local health service improvement, a flexible, bottom-up approach is essential. However, the current emphasis on top-down oversight acts as a barrier for local-level data use. Relevant and feasible measurement of the quality of facility-based care requires a fundamental shift in current RHIS priorities-from systems that extract data for those 'up there' to platforms that also create value for those who provide care.

部分图片:哪些常规保健数据能够和不能告诉我们坦桑尼亚孕产妇和新生儿保健服务的质量。
对孕产妇和新生儿保健服务接触覆盖率的测量可能高估了所提供护理的效益,因为没有考虑到护理的质量。因此,必须更好地了解在常规卫生信息系统(RHIS)中捕捉护理质量要素的机遇和挑战。本研究探讨了卫生保健工作者(HCWs)、卫生部门管理者和政策制定者对常规卫生数据的价值和局限性的看法,以了解坦桑尼亚孕产妇和新生儿卫生服务的质量。我们在两个时期进行了定性研究,以获取设施、地区、区域和国家层面的观点。2023年,我们在姆特瓦拉地区的两个医院产房进行了人种学观察,并对医护人员、医院领导和地区/区域管理人员进行了29次深入访谈。2025年,我们又对姆特瓦拉的区域经理和主要国家级利益攸关方进行了17次访谈。我们的研究结果表明,坦桑尼亚的RHIS提供了一个有价值但部分的孕产妇和新生儿保健服务质量的图景。护理过程——包括护理的提供和护理的经验——只在有限的范围内被捕获。利用边界对象理论,我们强调了相同的健康信息如何必须满足不同利益相关者的需求。虽然有机会整合更多的护理质量指标,但不能指望标准化的卫生保健制度全面反映护理质量的多面性。为了支持有意义的地方卫生服务改进,质量衡量必须采用灵活的、自下而上的方法。然而,目前强调自上而下的监督是地方一级数据使用的障碍。衡量以设施为基础的护理质量是相关的和可行的,这需要从根本上改变当前的RHIS优先事项——从为那些“在那里”的人提取数据的系统转向为提供护理的人创造价值的平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书