Optimizing exercise interventions for motor skills enhancement in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1177/02692155261428944
Yuxuan Zhang, Xiaoman Che, Zhenghao Dong, Jiaxing Shen, Ye Tao, Bo Cui, Feilong Zhu
{"title":"Optimizing exercise interventions for motor skills enhancement in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuxuan Zhang, Xiaoman Che, Zhenghao Dong, Jiaxing Shen, Ye Tao, Bo Cui, Feilong Zhu","doi":"10.1177/02692155261428944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to evaluate effects of physical exercises on gross and fine motor skills in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and to explore the influencing factors and dose-response relationships for optimizing exercise parameters.Data sourcesSix electronic databases were searched from inception to 20 June 2025, with an updated search performed on 27 January 2026.MethodsThe effect sizes were estimated using Hedge's <i>g</i> within three-level random-effects modeling frameworks. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine potential moderators, while restricted cubic splines were employed to characterize dose-response relationships.ResultsTwenty-one studies with 850 participants were included. Physical exercises showed moderate positive effects on both gross motor skills (Hedge's <i>g</i> = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76) and fine motor skills (Hedge's <i>g</i> = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.90). Significant improvements were observed in subcomponents of gross motor skills (locomotion, object control, body coordination, and strength) and fine motor skills (manual dexterity, hand-eye coordination, and handwriting). Moderator analyses indicated that longer session durations (>45 min) and higher frequencies (≥3 sessions/week) were associated with greater benefits. Fine motor skills (∼1350 min) appeared to require greater cumulative exercise exposure than gross motor skills (∼810 min) to achieve substantial gains.ConclusionPhysical exercise is an effective intervention for improving motor skills in children and adolescents with ADHD. However, the effectiveness of interventions appears to be moderated by motor subcomponents and dose parameters. Tailored programs, specific motor skill targets and dose parameters, should be integrated into clinical and educational practices to maximize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155261428944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to evaluate effects of physical exercises on gross and fine motor skills in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and to explore the influencing factors and dose-response relationships for optimizing exercise parameters.Data sourcesSix electronic databases were searched from inception to 20 June 2025, with an updated search performed on 27 January 2026.MethodsThe effect sizes were estimated using Hedge's g within three-level random-effects modeling frameworks. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine potential moderators, while restricted cubic splines were employed to characterize dose-response relationships.ResultsTwenty-one studies with 850 participants were included. Physical exercises showed moderate positive effects on both gross motor skills (Hedge's g = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76) and fine motor skills (Hedge's g = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.90). Significant improvements were observed in subcomponents of gross motor skills (locomotion, object control, body coordination, and strength) and fine motor skills (manual dexterity, hand-eye coordination, and handwriting). Moderator analyses indicated that longer session durations (>45 min) and higher frequencies (≥3 sessions/week) were associated with greater benefits. Fine motor skills (∼1350 min) appeared to require greater cumulative exercise exposure than gross motor skills (∼810 min) to achieve substantial gains.ConclusionPhysical exercise is an effective intervention for improving motor skills in children and adolescents with ADHD. However, the effectiveness of interventions appears to be moderated by motor subcomponents and dose parameters. Tailored programs, specific motor skill targets and dose parameters, should be integrated into clinical and educational practices to maximize outcomes.

优化运动干预对提高注意缺陷多动障碍患者运动技能的作用:来自荟萃分析的证据。
目的评价体育锻炼对注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童和青少年粗细运动技能的影响,探讨运动参数优化的影响因素和量效关系。从建立到2025年6月20日检索了essix电子数据库,并于2026年1月27日进行了更新检索。方法采用Hedge’s g在三水平随机效应模型框架内估计效应量。进行亚组分析以检查潜在的调节因子,同时采用限制性三次样条来表征剂量-反应关系。结果共纳入21项研究,850名受试者。体育锻炼对粗大运动技能(Hedge’s g = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76)和精细运动技能(Hedge’s g = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.90)均有中等程度的积极影响。在大运动技能(运动、物体控制、身体协调和力量)和精细运动技能(手灵巧、手眼协调和书写)的子成分中观察到显著的改善。调节分析表明,较长的疗程持续时间(45分钟)和较高的频率(≥3次/周)与更大的益处相关。精细运动技能(~ 1350分钟)似乎比大运动技能(~ 810分钟)需要更大的累积运动暴露来获得实质性的收益。结论体育锻炼是提高儿童青少年多动症运动技能的有效干预措施。然而,干预措施的有效性似乎受到运动亚成分和剂量参数的调节。量身定制的方案,特定的运动技能目标和剂量参数,应纳入临床和教育实践,以最大限度地提高效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书