A Two-Stage Decomposition-Grouping Strategy for Multi-Aircraft Weight and Balance Optimization of Non-ULD

IF 4.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yunfei Li;Jihui Xu
{"title":"A Two-Stage Decomposition-Grouping Strategy for Multi-Aircraft Weight and Balance Optimization of Non-ULD","authors":"Yunfei Li;Jihui Xu","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3661795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the weight balance problem in loading non-unit load devices (non-ULDs) for multi-aircraft. A two-stage weight balance optimization model was developed for multi-aircraft non-ULDs loading. The first stage involves a two-dimensional geometric constraint model for distributing non-ULDs positions, considering their constraints, with multi-objectives of maximizing aircraft cargo hold area utilization and payload, and minimizing aircraft sorties. The second stage is a weight and balance model for adjusting non-ULDs positions, considering various aircraft constraints. Two solution strategies are designed: first, decomposing the two-stage model into a two-dimensional geometric constraint model and a weight balance constraint model via logical checks; second, a grouping strategy that combines non-ULDs in pairs to form blocks. Using Gurobi, two scenarios with different combined solution strategies were verified for the B747F aircraft. The results indicate that, for large scale instances with a given number of non-ULD, the Gurobi decomposition with grouping delivers the best balance of solution quality and solving speed. On average, cargo hold utilization is 58.59%, the number of aircraft sorties is 11.25, and solver time is 108.19 s. Directly solving with Gurobi performs worse, with cargo hold utilization of 45.04%, the number of aircraft sorties is 13.75, and solver time of 1,689.29 s. The results from the Gurobi grouping strategy are very close to those from the Gurobi decomposition with grouping strategy, with averages of 58.59% cargo hold utilization, the number of aircraft sorties is 11.25, and 76.62 s for solver time. In contrast, the Gurobi decomposition strategy yields averages of 44.95% cargo hold utilization, the number of aircraft sorties is 13.75, and 957.28 s of solver time. All methods delivered an average payload of 1,154,489 kg for 11.25 to 13.75 sorties. The proposed model can realize the loading of batch non-ULDs across multi-aircraft. Relative to the decomposition strategy, the designed grouping strategy substantially accelerates solving time while maintaining competitive solution quality.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"14 ","pages":"34493-34509"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11373166","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11373166/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the weight balance problem in loading non-unit load devices (non-ULDs) for multi-aircraft. A two-stage weight balance optimization model was developed for multi-aircraft non-ULDs loading. The first stage involves a two-dimensional geometric constraint model for distributing non-ULDs positions, considering their constraints, with multi-objectives of maximizing aircraft cargo hold area utilization and payload, and minimizing aircraft sorties. The second stage is a weight and balance model for adjusting non-ULDs positions, considering various aircraft constraints. Two solution strategies are designed: first, decomposing the two-stage model into a two-dimensional geometric constraint model and a weight balance constraint model via logical checks; second, a grouping strategy that combines non-ULDs in pairs to form blocks. Using Gurobi, two scenarios with different combined solution strategies were verified for the B747F aircraft. The results indicate that, for large scale instances with a given number of non-ULD, the Gurobi decomposition with grouping delivers the best balance of solution quality and solving speed. On average, cargo hold utilization is 58.59%, the number of aircraft sorties is 11.25, and solver time is 108.19 s. Directly solving with Gurobi performs worse, with cargo hold utilization of 45.04%, the number of aircraft sorties is 13.75, and solver time of 1,689.29 s. The results from the Gurobi grouping strategy are very close to those from the Gurobi decomposition with grouping strategy, with averages of 58.59% cargo hold utilization, the number of aircraft sorties is 11.25, and 76.62 s for solver time. In contrast, the Gurobi decomposition strategy yields averages of 44.95% cargo hold utilization, the number of aircraft sorties is 13.75, and 957.28 s of solver time. All methods delivered an average payload of 1,154,489 kg for 11.25 to 13.75 sorties. The proposed model can realize the loading of batch non-ULDs across multi-aircraft. Relative to the decomposition strategy, the designed grouping strategy substantially accelerates solving time while maintaining competitive solution quality.
非uld多机重量与平衡优化的两阶段分解分组策略
本文研究了多架飞机装载非单元负载装置的重量平衡问题。建立了多架飞机非超低载重的两阶段重量平衡优化模型。第一阶段是建立二维几何约束模型,考虑非ld位置的约束条件,以最大化货舱面积利用率和有效载荷、最小化飞机架次为多目标。第二阶段是一个重量和平衡模型,用于考虑各种飞机约束,调整非超高清设备的位置。设计了两种求解策略:首先,通过逻辑检查将两阶段模型分解为二维几何约束模型和权重平衡约束模型;第二,将非uld成对组合成块的分组策略。使用Gurobi,对B747F飞机进行了两种不同组合解决策略的场景验证。结果表明,对于具有给定数量的非uld的大规模实例,带分组的Gurobi分解提供了解决质量和解决速度的最佳平衡。货舱平均利用率为58.59%,飞机架次为11.25架次,求解时间为108.19 s。直接与古罗比求解效果较差,货舱利用率为45.04%,飞机架次为13.75架次,求解时间为1689.29 s。Gurobi分组策略的结果与采用分组策略的Gurobi分解结果非常接近,平均货舱利用率为58.59%,飞机架次为11.25架次,求解时间为76.62 s。相比之下,Gurobi分解策略的平均货舱利用率为44.95%,飞机架次为13.75架次,求解时间为957.28 s。所有方法提供11.25至13.75架次的平均有效载荷为1,154,489公斤。该模型可以实现多架飞机批量装载非ulds。相对于分解策略,所设计的分组策略在保持竞争性解质量的同时,大大加快了求解时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书