The Role of Reinforcement Learning in Production Control: A Systematic Literature Review

IF 4.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jonas Schneider;Carl Pfannschmidt;Peter Nyhuis;Matthias Schmidt
{"title":"The Role of Reinforcement Learning in Production Control: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Jonas Schneider;Carl Pfannschmidt;Peter Nyhuis;Matthias Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3668903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The expansion of product portfolios, the reduction of product life cycles and the volatility of markets pose significant challenges for production systems and their control. Concurrently, these trends present a challenge in achieving an optimal balance between logistical performance and internal company costs. The discordance between the escalating demands of customers on logistics performance, exemplified by metrics such as throughput time and schedule reliability, and the cost-driven corporate objective of minimizing work-in-process and maximizing machine utilization, is becoming increasingly challenging to reconcile. The application of reinforcement learning (RL) is a significant machine learning (ML) approach for overcoming these challenges. In comparison with other ML approaches, RL facilitates direct interaction with production systems and is consequently well suited for controlling them in operational use. Despite the extensive body of research on RL approaches for production control tasks, there is a paucity of literature addressing the influence of these approaches on key logistical targets for logistics performance and costs. The article’s added value derives from the systematic literature review it conducts, which provides researchers and practitioners with an overview of how existing RL approaches influence central logistical target variables. Furthermore, it highlights blind spots in the research landscape. The results indicate the existence of a substantial number of approaches; however, their distribution across control tasks is disproportionate. Furthermore, it is evident that there are distinct discrepancies in the classification system with respect to the impact on logistical target variables.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"14 ","pages":"34375-34389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11415616","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11415616/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The expansion of product portfolios, the reduction of product life cycles and the volatility of markets pose significant challenges for production systems and their control. Concurrently, these trends present a challenge in achieving an optimal balance between logistical performance and internal company costs. The discordance between the escalating demands of customers on logistics performance, exemplified by metrics such as throughput time and schedule reliability, and the cost-driven corporate objective of minimizing work-in-process and maximizing machine utilization, is becoming increasingly challenging to reconcile. The application of reinforcement learning (RL) is a significant machine learning (ML) approach for overcoming these challenges. In comparison with other ML approaches, RL facilitates direct interaction with production systems and is consequently well suited for controlling them in operational use. Despite the extensive body of research on RL approaches for production control tasks, there is a paucity of literature addressing the influence of these approaches on key logistical targets for logistics performance and costs. The article’s added value derives from the systematic literature review it conducts, which provides researchers and practitioners with an overview of how existing RL approaches influence central logistical target variables. Furthermore, it highlights blind spots in the research landscape. The results indicate the existence of a substantial number of approaches; however, their distribution across control tasks is disproportionate. Furthermore, it is evident that there are distinct discrepancies in the classification system with respect to the impact on logistical target variables.
强化学习在生产控制中的作用:系统的文献回顾
产品组合的扩大、产品生命周期的缩短和市场的波动对生产系统及其控制构成重大挑战。同时,这些趋势在实现物流绩效和公司内部成本之间的最佳平衡方面提出了挑战。客户对物流绩效的不断升级的需求(以生产时间和计划可靠性等指标为例)与成本驱动的企业目标(最小化在制品和最大化机器利用率)之间的不协调正变得越来越具有挑战性。强化学习(RL)的应用是克服这些挑战的重要机器学习(ML)方法。与其他机器学习方法相比,强化学习促进了与生产系统的直接交互,因此非常适合在操作使用中控制它们。尽管对生产控制任务的RL方法进行了广泛的研究,但缺乏文献解决这些方法对物流绩效和成本的关键物流目标的影响。本文的附加价值来自于它进行的系统文献综述,它为研究人员和实践者提供了现有强化学习方法如何影响中心物流目标变量的概述。此外,它还突出了研究领域的盲点。结果表明存在大量的方法;然而,它们在控制任务中的分布是不成比例的。此外,很明显,在对后勤目标变量的影响方面,分类制度存在明显的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书