Jonas Schneider;Carl Pfannschmidt;Peter Nyhuis;Matthias Schmidt
{"title":"The Role of Reinforcement Learning in Production Control: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Jonas Schneider;Carl Pfannschmidt;Peter Nyhuis;Matthias Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3668903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The expansion of product portfolios, the reduction of product life cycles and the volatility of markets pose significant challenges for production systems and their control. Concurrently, these trends present a challenge in achieving an optimal balance between logistical performance and internal company costs. The discordance between the escalating demands of customers on logistics performance, exemplified by metrics such as throughput time and schedule reliability, and the cost-driven corporate objective of minimizing work-in-process and maximizing machine utilization, is becoming increasingly challenging to reconcile. The application of reinforcement learning (RL) is a significant machine learning (ML) approach for overcoming these challenges. In comparison with other ML approaches, RL facilitates direct interaction with production systems and is consequently well suited for controlling them in operational use. Despite the extensive body of research on RL approaches for production control tasks, there is a paucity of literature addressing the influence of these approaches on key logistical targets for logistics performance and costs. The article’s added value derives from the systematic literature review it conducts, which provides researchers and practitioners with an overview of how existing RL approaches influence central logistical target variables. Furthermore, it highlights blind spots in the research landscape. The results indicate the existence of a substantial number of approaches; however, their distribution across control tasks is disproportionate. Furthermore, it is evident that there are distinct discrepancies in the classification system with respect to the impact on logistical target variables.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"14 ","pages":"34375-34389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11415616","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11415616/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The expansion of product portfolios, the reduction of product life cycles and the volatility of markets pose significant challenges for production systems and their control. Concurrently, these trends present a challenge in achieving an optimal balance between logistical performance and internal company costs. The discordance between the escalating demands of customers on logistics performance, exemplified by metrics such as throughput time and schedule reliability, and the cost-driven corporate objective of minimizing work-in-process and maximizing machine utilization, is becoming increasingly challenging to reconcile. The application of reinforcement learning (RL) is a significant machine learning (ML) approach for overcoming these challenges. In comparison with other ML approaches, RL facilitates direct interaction with production systems and is consequently well suited for controlling them in operational use. Despite the extensive body of research on RL approaches for production control tasks, there is a paucity of literature addressing the influence of these approaches on key logistical targets for logistics performance and costs. The article’s added value derives from the systematic literature review it conducts, which provides researchers and practitioners with an overview of how existing RL approaches influence central logistical target variables. Furthermore, it highlights blind spots in the research landscape. The results indicate the existence of a substantial number of approaches; however, their distribution across control tasks is disproportionate. Furthermore, it is evident that there are distinct discrepancies in the classification system with respect to the impact on logistical target variables.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.