A Robust and Fast Operational Risk Assessment Method for Composite Power Systems With High Wind Power Penetration

IF 8.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2026.3670459
Jueyou Li;Kairui Gu;Kequan Zhao;Zhengmao Li;Zhaoyang Dong
{"title":"A Robust and Fast Operational Risk Assessment Method for Composite Power Systems With High Wind Power Penetration","authors":"Jueyou Li;Kairui Gu;Kequan Zhao;Zhengmao Li;Zhaoyang Dong","doi":"10.1109/TPWRS.2026.3670459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strong stochasticity and volatility of wind power generation pose new challenges to the operational reliability of power systems. Traditional reliability assessment often struggles to balance economic efficiency and robustness under high-penetration wind power integration, yielding either optimistic or overly conservative results. We develop a data-driven distributionally robust optimization (DRO) model for operational risk assessment, which computes state-conditioned reliability indices while hedging probability misspecification and distribution shifts. To meet real-time needs, we propose a CNN-DRO method that predicts the worst-case probability distribution (WPD) and thereby collapses the tri-level “min-max-min” DRO model to a single-level OPF-consistent optimization problem solved per operating state. This preserves physical feasibility and enables minute-level updates. A hybrid CNN Classifier-Regressor design first screens secure states (no load shedding needed) and then predicts the WPD for insecure states, so only the latter invokes the single-level optimization solve. The CNN inference is negligible relative to the solver. Numerical simulations are conducted on the RTS-79 and IEEE 118-bus systems under varying wind power penetration levels, with comparisons against stochastic optimization (SO) and robust optimization (RO) methods. The results validate the superior robustness and economic benefits of the proposed DRO model in operational risk assessment for high-penetration wind power systems. Additionally, experiments demonstrate that the proposed method has much higher computational speed and accuracy when compared with the classical column and constraint generation (CCG) algorithm.","PeriodicalId":13373,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","volume":"41 4","pages":"2838-2849"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11421570/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The strong stochasticity and volatility of wind power generation pose new challenges to the operational reliability of power systems. Traditional reliability assessment often struggles to balance economic efficiency and robustness under high-penetration wind power integration, yielding either optimistic or overly conservative results. We develop a data-driven distributionally robust optimization (DRO) model for operational risk assessment, which computes state-conditioned reliability indices while hedging probability misspecification and distribution shifts. To meet real-time needs, we propose a CNN-DRO method that predicts the worst-case probability distribution (WPD) and thereby collapses the tri-level “min-max-min” DRO model to a single-level OPF-consistent optimization problem solved per operating state. This preserves physical feasibility and enables minute-level updates. A hybrid CNN Classifier-Regressor design first screens secure states (no load shedding needed) and then predicts the WPD for insecure states, so only the latter invokes the single-level optimization solve. The CNN inference is negligible relative to the solver. Numerical simulations are conducted on the RTS-79 and IEEE 118-bus systems under varying wind power penetration levels, with comparisons against stochastic optimization (SO) and robust optimization (RO) methods. The results validate the superior robustness and economic benefits of the proposed DRO model in operational risk assessment for high-penetration wind power systems. Additionally, experiments demonstrate that the proposed method has much higher computational speed and accuracy when compared with the classical column and constraint generation (CCG) algorithm.
高风电渗透复合电力系统鲁棒快速运行风险评估方法
风力发电的强随机性和波动性对电力系统的运行可靠性提出了新的挑战。传统的可靠性评估往往难以平衡高渗透风电一体化的经济效率和稳健性,结果要么乐观,要么过于保守。我们开发了一个数据驱动的分布鲁棒优化(DRO)模型用于操作风险评估,该模型在对冲概率错配和分布偏移的情况下计算状态条件可靠性指标。为了满足实时需求,我们提出了一种预测最坏概率分布(WPD)的CNN-DRO方法,从而将三层“最小-最大-最小”DRO模型分解为每个运行状态求解的单级opf一致优化问题。这保留了物理上的可行性,并支持分钟级更新。混合CNN分类器-回归器设计首先筛选安全状态(不需要减负荷),然后预测不安全状态的WPD,因此只有后者调用单级优化解决方案。相对于求解器,CNN推断是可以忽略不计的。对不同风电渗透水平下的RTS-79和IEEE 118总线系统进行了数值模拟,并与随机优化(SO)和鲁棒优化(RO)方法进行了比较。结果验证了所提出的DRO模型在高渗透风电系统运行风险评估中的鲁棒性和经济效益。实验结果表明,与传统的列约束生成(CCG)算法相比,该方法具有更高的计算速度和精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
7.60%
发文量
696
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The scope of IEEE Transactions on Power Systems covers the education, analysis, operation, planning, and economics of electric generation, transmission, and distribution systems for general industrial, commercial, public, and domestic consumption, including the interaction with multi-energy carriers. The focus of this transactions is the power system from a systems viewpoint instead of components of the system. It has five (5) key areas within its scope with several technical topics within each area. These areas are: (1) Power Engineering Education, (2) Power System Analysis, Computing, and Economics, (3) Power System Dynamic Performance, (4) Power System Operations, and (5) Power System Planning and Implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书