Methodological problems in the use of indocyanine green to estimate hepatic blood flow and ICG clearance in man.

C Skak, S Keiding
{"title":"Methodological problems in the use of indocyanine green to estimate hepatic blood flow and ICG clearance in man.","authors":"C Skak,&nbsp;S Keiding","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0676.1987.tb00336.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver blood flow (Q) is often measured by constant infusion of ICG (i), concentration measurements in an artery (A) and a hepatic vein (V): Q = (A-V)/A. Some authors use ICG clearance, Cl = i/A, as a measure of Q assuming complete hepatic extraction. During the infusion, the ICG concentration often increases. The importance of this for calculated values of Q and Cl was examined, and the use of Cl as a measure of Q was reevaluated. ICG was given as 0.06-0.20 mumol/min to 52 subjects with liver disease, and about 0.20 mumol/min to 86 subjects with no liver disease. ICG concentration increased steeply during the first 90 min after start of the infusion; thereafter the increment was constant as evaluated in successive 40-min periods in eleven 320-min studies (analysis of variance P greater than 0.5); on average, 6 +/- 1% per hour (+/- SD). Q was not time-dependent (P greater than 0.5). ICG clearance decreased significantly, on average 5 +/- 2% per hour (+/- SD). Hepatic extraction fraction, (A-V)/A, (measurement period 90-130 min) was 0.34 +/- 0.21 in liver patients (+/- SD) and 0.61 +/- 0.80 in controls. Cl and Q were positively correlated in both groups but with substantial scatter. Thus, not only is the calculated ICG clearance time-dependent but the extraction fraction is further so low and variable, that any use of ICG clearance as a measure of liver flow is not justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":18183,"journal":{"name":"Liver","volume":"7 3","pages":"155-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0676.1987.tb00336.x","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0676.1987.tb00336.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

Abstract

Liver blood flow (Q) is often measured by constant infusion of ICG (i), concentration measurements in an artery (A) and a hepatic vein (V): Q = (A-V)/A. Some authors use ICG clearance, Cl = i/A, as a measure of Q assuming complete hepatic extraction. During the infusion, the ICG concentration often increases. The importance of this for calculated values of Q and Cl was examined, and the use of Cl as a measure of Q was reevaluated. ICG was given as 0.06-0.20 mumol/min to 52 subjects with liver disease, and about 0.20 mumol/min to 86 subjects with no liver disease. ICG concentration increased steeply during the first 90 min after start of the infusion; thereafter the increment was constant as evaluated in successive 40-min periods in eleven 320-min studies (analysis of variance P greater than 0.5); on average, 6 +/- 1% per hour (+/- SD). Q was not time-dependent (P greater than 0.5). ICG clearance decreased significantly, on average 5 +/- 2% per hour (+/- SD). Hepatic extraction fraction, (A-V)/A, (measurement period 90-130 min) was 0.34 +/- 0.21 in liver patients (+/- SD) and 0.61 +/- 0.80 in controls. Cl and Q were positively correlated in both groups but with substantial scatter. Thus, not only is the calculated ICG clearance time-dependent but the extraction fraction is further so low and variable, that any use of ICG clearance as a measure of liver flow is not justified.

用吲哚菁绿估计人肝血流和ICG清除率的方法学问题。
肝血流量(Q)通常通过持续输注ICG (i),动脉(A)和肝静脉(V)的浓度测量来测量:Q = (A-V)/A。一些作者使用ICG清除率Cl = i/A作为假设完全肝提取的Q的度量。在输注过程中,ICG浓度经常升高。这对Q和Cl的计算值的重要性进行了检验,并重新评估了Cl作为Q的度量的使用。52例肝病患者ICG剂量为0.06 ~ 0.20 μ mol/min, 86例无肝病患者ICG剂量约为0.20 μ mol/min。在开始给药后的前90 min, ICG浓度急剧升高;此后,在11个320分钟的研究中,在连续40分钟的时间内,增量保持不变(方差分析P大于0.5);平均每小时6±1%(±SD)。Q与时间无关(P > 0.5)。ICG清除率显著下降,平均每小时5 +/- 2% (+/- SD)。肝脏提取分数(A- v)/A(测量周期90-130 min),肝脏患者为0.34 +/- 0.21 (+/- SD),对照组为0.61 +/- 0.80。Cl和Q在两组间呈正相关,但存在较大的分散。因此,不仅计算出的ICG清除率与时间有关,而且提取分数如此之低且多变,以至于任何使用ICG清除率作为肝流量的测量都是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信