{"title":"Methodological problems in the use of indocyanine green to estimate hepatic blood flow and ICG clearance in man.","authors":"C Skak, S Keiding","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0676.1987.tb00336.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver blood flow (Q) is often measured by constant infusion of ICG (i), concentration measurements in an artery (A) and a hepatic vein (V): Q = (A-V)/A. Some authors use ICG clearance, Cl = i/A, as a measure of Q assuming complete hepatic extraction. During the infusion, the ICG concentration often increases. The importance of this for calculated values of Q and Cl was examined, and the use of Cl as a measure of Q was reevaluated. ICG was given as 0.06-0.20 mumol/min to 52 subjects with liver disease, and about 0.20 mumol/min to 86 subjects with no liver disease. ICG concentration increased steeply during the first 90 min after start of the infusion; thereafter the increment was constant as evaluated in successive 40-min periods in eleven 320-min studies (analysis of variance P greater than 0.5); on average, 6 +/- 1% per hour (+/- SD). Q was not time-dependent (P greater than 0.5). ICG clearance decreased significantly, on average 5 +/- 2% per hour (+/- SD). Hepatic extraction fraction, (A-V)/A, (measurement period 90-130 min) was 0.34 +/- 0.21 in liver patients (+/- SD) and 0.61 +/- 0.80 in controls. Cl and Q were positively correlated in both groups but with substantial scatter. Thus, not only is the calculated ICG clearance time-dependent but the extraction fraction is further so low and variable, that any use of ICG clearance as a measure of liver flow is not justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":18183,"journal":{"name":"Liver","volume":"7 3","pages":"155-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0676.1987.tb00336.x","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0676.1987.tb00336.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102
Abstract
Liver blood flow (Q) is often measured by constant infusion of ICG (i), concentration measurements in an artery (A) and a hepatic vein (V): Q = (A-V)/A. Some authors use ICG clearance, Cl = i/A, as a measure of Q assuming complete hepatic extraction. During the infusion, the ICG concentration often increases. The importance of this for calculated values of Q and Cl was examined, and the use of Cl as a measure of Q was reevaluated. ICG was given as 0.06-0.20 mumol/min to 52 subjects with liver disease, and about 0.20 mumol/min to 86 subjects with no liver disease. ICG concentration increased steeply during the first 90 min after start of the infusion; thereafter the increment was constant as evaluated in successive 40-min periods in eleven 320-min studies (analysis of variance P greater than 0.5); on average, 6 +/- 1% per hour (+/- SD). Q was not time-dependent (P greater than 0.5). ICG clearance decreased significantly, on average 5 +/- 2% per hour (+/- SD). Hepatic extraction fraction, (A-V)/A, (measurement period 90-130 min) was 0.34 +/- 0.21 in liver patients (+/- SD) and 0.61 +/- 0.80 in controls. Cl and Q were positively correlated in both groups but with substantial scatter. Thus, not only is the calculated ICG clearance time-dependent but the extraction fraction is further so low and variable, that any use of ICG clearance as a measure of liver flow is not justified.