[How much trauma surgery occurs in the emergency department and how is the quality of treatment assured?]

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s00113-026-01690-2
Wolfgang Lehmann, Christine Höfer
{"title":"[How much trauma surgery occurs in the emergency department and how is the quality of treatment assured?]","authors":"Wolfgang Lehmann, Christine Höfer","doi":"10.1007/s00113-026-01690-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the 2018 decision of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) inpatient emergency care in Germany has undergone a profound structural change. Although musculoskeletal injuries account for around 40-45% of the emergency department (ED) caseload, current regulations lack binding requirements for primary trauma/orthopedic surgical treatment. This raises questions regarding quality of care, legal certainty and postgraduate training.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated to what extent injured patients in German trauma centers receive primary care from physicians with trauma surgery qualifications and which structural consequences result from this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a nationwide online survey all 626 trauma centers listed in the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU) TraumaNetwork were contacted. Data were collected on ED structures, the qualifications of physicians involved in primary care and responsibilities for setting the indications for trauma/orthopedic surgery. In addition, a qualitative content analysis of voluntary free-text comments was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 225 trauma centers were analyzed (response rate 36%). The primary care of non-polytraumatized trauma/orthopedic surgery patients was provided predominantly by trauma surgery residents (53% local trauma centers, 56% regional trauma centers, 59% supraregional trauma centers). The on-site presence of board-certified trauma surgeons was lower (16-28%). In 78 hospitals emergency physicians from other disciplines provided initial care in fewer than 10% of cases. The free-text comments emphasized deficits in quality of care and postgraduate training.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results demonstrate a relevant discrepancy between the epidemiological importance of trauma/orthopedic clinical conditions and their structural anchoring in the emergency department. The G‑BA requirements ensure organizational standards but do not guarantee specialty-specific depth. To ensure quality of care, legal certainty and postgraduate training, binding regulations for trauma/orthopedic surgical competence in the ED are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-026-01690-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the 2018 decision of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) inpatient emergency care in Germany has undergone a profound structural change. Although musculoskeletal injuries account for around 40-45% of the emergency department (ED) caseload, current regulations lack binding requirements for primary trauma/orthopedic surgical treatment. This raises questions regarding quality of care, legal certainty and postgraduate training.

Objective: This study investigated to what extent injured patients in German trauma centers receive primary care from physicians with trauma surgery qualifications and which structural consequences result from this.

Methods: In a nationwide online survey all 626 trauma centers listed in the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU) TraumaNetwork were contacted. Data were collected on ED structures, the qualifications of physicians involved in primary care and responsibilities for setting the indications for trauma/orthopedic surgery. In addition, a qualitative content analysis of voluntary free-text comments was performed.

Results: Responses from 225 trauma centers were analyzed (response rate 36%). The primary care of non-polytraumatized trauma/orthopedic surgery patients was provided predominantly by trauma surgery residents (53% local trauma centers, 56% regional trauma centers, 59% supraregional trauma centers). The on-site presence of board-certified trauma surgeons was lower (16-28%). In 78 hospitals emergency physicians from other disciplines provided initial care in fewer than 10% of cases. The free-text comments emphasized deficits in quality of care and postgraduate training.

Discussion: The results demonstrate a relevant discrepancy between the epidemiological importance of trauma/orthopedic clinical conditions and their structural anchoring in the emergency department. The G‑BA requirements ensure organizational standards but do not guarantee specialty-specific depth. To ensure quality of care, legal certainty and postgraduate training, binding regulations for trauma/orthopedic surgical competence in the ED are necessary.

急诊科有多少创伤手术?如何保证治疗质量?]
背景:自2018年联邦联合委员会(G-BA)的决定以来,德国的住院急诊护理经历了深刻的结构性变化。虽然肌肉骨骼损伤约占急诊科(ED)病例量的40-45%,但目前的法规缺乏对原发性创伤/骨科手术治疗的约束性要求。这就提出了有关护理质量、法律确定性和研究生培训的问题。目的:本研究调查了德国创伤中心的受伤患者在多大程度上接受具有创伤外科资格的医生的初级护理,以及由此导致的结构性后果。方法:通过一项全国性的在线调查,联系了德国创伤外科学会(DGU)创伤网络中列出的626家创伤中心。收集的数据包括急诊科的结构、参与初级保健的医生的资格以及制定创伤/骨科手术指征的责任。此外,对自愿的自由文本评论进行了定性内容分析。结果:对225家创伤中心的应答进行分析,应答率为36%。非多发创伤/骨科手术患者的初级护理主要由创伤外科住院医师提供(53%的地方创伤中心,56%的区域创伤中心,59%的超区域创伤中心)。委员会认证的创伤外科医生的在场率较低(16-28%)。在78家医院中,来自其他学科的急诊医生在不到10%的病例中提供初始护理。自由文本评论强调了护理质量和研究生培训方面的缺陷。讨论:研究结果表明,创伤/骨科临床状况的流行病学重要性与其在急诊科的结构锚定之间存在相关差异。G - BA要求确保组织标准,但不保证特定于专业的深度。为了确保护理质量、法律确定性和研究生培训,有必要对急诊科的创伤/骨科手术能力制定有约束力的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书