Weixiang Lu, Xiaoshan Huang, Shengyu Tian, Xiaojie Liang, Guanzhou Ke, Jia Guo, Qingqing Li, Yuquan Huang, Yang Li, Baiwei Luo, Bingyu Lin, Dan Xu, Liang Wang
{"title":"The Changing Landscape of Second Primary Malignancies in Multiple Myeloma: A SEER Population-Based Study Between Two Therapeutic Eras.","authors":"Weixiang Lu, Xiaoshan Huang, Shengyu Tian, Xiaojie Liang, Guanzhou Ke, Jia Guo, Qingqing Li, Yuquan Huang, Yang Li, Baiwei Luo, Bingyu Lin, Dan Xu, Liang Wang","doi":"10.1177/10732748261432266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe introduction of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents has significantly improved the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM). However, the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in MM survivors has raised widespread concern.MethodsThis population-based retrospective study using the SEER database analyzed data from 26,869 MM patients (1990-2021) to evaluate changes in SPMs across two therapeutic eras. Patients were stratified into two therapeutic eras based on the year of MM diagnosis: Era-1 (1990-2005; n=12,858) and Era-2 (2006-2021; n=14,011).ResultsAmong 1,346 MM patients who developed SPMs, 670 were in Era-1 and 676 in Era-2. The 15-year cumulative incidence of SPMs was significantly higher in Era-2 (7.7% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001), an increase driven mainly by solid tumors (6.90% vs. 4.10%, P < 0.001) with no significant change in second hematological malignancies (0.84% vs. 0.67%, P = 0.13). Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) analysis revealed elevated hematological malignancy risk in Era-2 (SIR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.49-1.96). Median time to SPM was shorter in Era-2 (43.5 vs. 59 months, P < 0.001). Notably, 80% of SPMs in Era-2 occurred within 90 months of MM diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) of SPM patients showed no significant improvement in Era-2 compared to Era-1. Within each diagnostic era, patients who developed SPMs exhibited longer overall survival than those with MM alone; however, this reflects survivor bias, as SPMs can only develop in patients who survive long enough after the initial MM diagnosis. No significant OS differences were observed among SPM patients by race or gender.ConclusionsThe risk of SPMs in MM survivors has significantly increased, and the latency between MM diagnosis and the onset of SPMs was shorter in the Era-2, highlighting the need for enhanced cancer surveillance in MM survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261432266"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12961105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748261432266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionThe introduction of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents has significantly improved the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM). However, the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in MM survivors has raised widespread concern.MethodsThis population-based retrospective study using the SEER database analyzed data from 26,869 MM patients (1990-2021) to evaluate changes in SPMs across two therapeutic eras. Patients were stratified into two therapeutic eras based on the year of MM diagnosis: Era-1 (1990-2005; n=12,858) and Era-2 (2006-2021; n=14,011).ResultsAmong 1,346 MM patients who developed SPMs, 670 were in Era-1 and 676 in Era-2. The 15-year cumulative incidence of SPMs was significantly higher in Era-2 (7.7% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001), an increase driven mainly by solid tumors (6.90% vs. 4.10%, P < 0.001) with no significant change in second hematological malignancies (0.84% vs. 0.67%, P = 0.13). Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) analysis revealed elevated hematological malignancy risk in Era-2 (SIR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.49-1.96). Median time to SPM was shorter in Era-2 (43.5 vs. 59 months, P < 0.001). Notably, 80% of SPMs in Era-2 occurred within 90 months of MM diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) of SPM patients showed no significant improvement in Era-2 compared to Era-1. Within each diagnostic era, patients who developed SPMs exhibited longer overall survival than those with MM alone; however, this reflects survivor bias, as SPMs can only develop in patients who survive long enough after the initial MM diagnosis. No significant OS differences were observed among SPM patients by race or gender.ConclusionsThe risk of SPMs in MM survivors has significantly increased, and the latency between MM diagnosis and the onset of SPMs was shorter in the Era-2, highlighting the need for enhanced cancer surveillance in MM survivors.
引入蛋白酶体抑制剂和免疫调节剂可显著改善多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的预后。然而,第二原发恶性肿瘤(SPMs)在MM幸存者中的发生引起了广泛关注。方法:本研究基于人群,使用SEER数据库分析了26,869例MM患者(1990-2021)的数据,以评估两个治疗时期SPMs的变化。根据MM诊断年份将患者分为两个治疗期:Era-1 (1990-2005, n=12,858)和Era-2 (2006-2021, n=14,011)。结果1346例MM发生SPMs的患者中,Era-1 670例,Era-2 676例。在Era-2中,SPMs的15年累积发病率显著升高(7.7% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001),主要由实体瘤引起(6.90% vs. 4.10%, P < 0.001),第二血液系统恶性肿瘤无显著变化(0.84% vs. 0.67%, P = 0.13)。标准化发病率(SIR)分析显示Era-2患者血液系统恶性肿瘤风险升高(SIR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.49-1.96)。Era-2患者到SPM的中位时间较短(43.5个月比59个月,P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,Era-2中80%的SPMs发生在MM诊断后90个月内。与Era-1相比,Era-2对SPM患者的总生存期(OS)没有显著改善。在每个诊断时期,患有SPMs的患者比单纯患有MM的患者的总生存期更长;然而,这反映了幸存者的偏见,因为SPMs只能在最初的MM诊断后存活足够长的患者中发展。SPM患者的OS无明显的种族和性别差异。结论MM幸存者发生SPMs的风险显著增加,并且在Era-2中MM诊断和SPMs发病之间的潜伏期较短,突出了加强MM幸存者癌症监测的必要性。
期刊介绍:
Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.