Early risk stratification after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the role of positive surgical margins.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Pub Date : 2026-03-31 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.4081/aiua.2026.14871
Alberto Zambudio-Munuera, Irene Millán-Ramos, Patricia Rodríguez-Parras, Francisco Gutiérrez-Tejero, Maria Teresa Melgarejo-Segura, Miguel Arrabal-Martin, Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo
{"title":"Early risk stratification after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the role of positive surgical margins.","authors":"Alberto Zambudio-Munuera, Irene Millán-Ramos, Patricia Rodríguez-Parras, Francisco Gutiérrez-Tejero, Maria Teresa Melgarejo-Segura, Miguel Arrabal-Martin, Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2026.14871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are consistently associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR), yet their prognostic heterogeneity and functional implications remain debated. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological and functional impact of PSMs and to explore clinicopathological predictors of margin positivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 93 patients undergoing RARP. Surgical margin status, length, focality, and location were recorded. BCR was defined as PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL confirmed by two measurements. Functional outcomes (urinary continence and erectile function) were assessed at 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of PSM, and Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated BCR-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSMs were identified in 48 patients (51.6%). During a median follow-up of 11 months, BCR occurred more frequently in patients with PSMs than in those with negative margins (20.8% vs 4.4%, p=0.018). PSMs were associated with significantly worse early BCR-free survival (log-rank p=0.013). Margin length ≥3 mm did not stratify early BCR risk. In multivariable analysis, ISUP Grade Group 3-5 was the only independent predictor of PSM (OR 0.25, p=0.044). No significant differences in urinary continence or erectile function at 6 months were observed according to margin status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSMs are associated with an increased risk of early biochemical recurrence, while early functional outcomes appear independent of margin status. Tumor biology, rather than surgical factors, emerges as the main determinant of margin positivity. These findings support a risk-adapted interpretation of PSMs and align with current guidelines favoring close surveillance and early salvage treatment over routine adjuvant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":" ","pages":"14871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are consistently associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR), yet their prognostic heterogeneity and functional implications remain debated. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological and functional impact of PSMs and to explore clinicopathological predictors of margin positivity.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 93 patients undergoing RARP. Surgical margin status, length, focality, and location were recorded. BCR was defined as PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL confirmed by two measurements. Functional outcomes (urinary continence and erectile function) were assessed at 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of PSM, and Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated BCR-free survival.

Results: PSMs were identified in 48 patients (51.6%). During a median follow-up of 11 months, BCR occurred more frequently in patients with PSMs than in those with negative margins (20.8% vs 4.4%, p=0.018). PSMs were associated with significantly worse early BCR-free survival (log-rank p=0.013). Margin length ≥3 mm did not stratify early BCR risk. In multivariable analysis, ISUP Grade Group 3-5 was the only independent predictor of PSM (OR 0.25, p=0.044). No significant differences in urinary continence or erectile function at 6 months were observed according to margin status.

Conclusions: PSMs are associated with an increased risk of early biochemical recurrence, while early functional outcomes appear independent of margin status. Tumor biology, rather than surgical factors, emerges as the main determinant of margin positivity. These findings support a risk-adapted interpretation of PSMs and align with current guidelines favoring close surveillance and early salvage treatment over routine adjuvant therapy.

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的早期风险分层:手术切缘阳性的作用。
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后的阳性手术切缘(psm)一直与生化复发(BCR)相关,但其预后异质性和功能意义仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估psm对肿瘤和功能的影响,并探讨切缘阳性的临床病理预测因素。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性的单中心研究,包括93例接受RARP治疗的患者。记录手术切缘状态、长度、病灶和位置。BCR定义为PSA≥0.2 ng/mL。6个月时评估功能结局(尿失禁和勃起功能)。多变量logistic回归确定PSM的预测因子,Kaplan-Meier分析评估无bcr生存期。结果:48例患者(51.6%)检出psm。在中位随访11个月期间,BCR在psm患者中的发生率高于阴性切缘患者(20.8% vs 4.4%, p=0.018)。psm与早期无bcr生存期显著恶化相关(log-rank p=0.013)。切缘长度≥3mm不能区分早期BCR风险。在多变量分析中,ISUP分级3-5组是PSM的唯一独立预测因子(OR 0.25, p=0.044)。6个月时,两组患者的尿失禁和勃起功能无明显差异。结论:psm与早期生化复发风险增加有关,而早期功能结局似乎与切缘状态无关。肿瘤生物学,而不是手术因素,成为边缘阳性的主要决定因素。这些发现支持对pms的风险适应性解释,并与当前的指南一致,倾向于密切监测和早期抢救治疗,而不是常规辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书