General practitioners' relational familiarity with home-dwelling patients in the palliative phase: Basis - or bias - for individualised care.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2026-02-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524261426398
Katrine Staats, Sandra Jahr Svendsen, Veronica Lockertsen
{"title":"General practitioners' relational familiarity with home-dwelling patients in the palliative phase: Basis - or bias - for individualised care.","authors":"Katrine Staats, Sandra Jahr Svendsen, Veronica Lockertsen","doi":"10.1177/26323524261426398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An ageing population has increased the need for home-based palliative care. General practitioners (GPs) are central to continuity of care, yet time pressure and organisational constraints can challenge person-centred practice grounded in relational familiarity with patients and families.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to explore how GPs navigate the relational familiarity in home-based palliative care and whether it functions as a basis or a bias for individualised care.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>A secondary hermeneutic analysis was conducted, utilising data from two qualitative studies involving 21 GPs. These datasets focused on dignity-preserving care and shared decision making in palliative contexts. The hermeneutic circle was applied in an iterative process to interpret the in-depth interviews and focus group discussions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A qualitative, explorative, and descriptive design grounded in hermeneutic methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two overarching themes emerged: (1) Relational familiarity: A cornerstone of complex dimensions, where familiarity enabled trust, continuity and tailored care; however, it also created overfamiliarity that narrows perspective, blurs boundaries and burdens GPs. (2) Variability in engagement and follow-up, which reflected differences in individual GPs' interests, systemic constraints and the involvement of other healthcare professionals. While relational familiarity facilitated person-centred care, it was unevenly distributed, creating disparities in the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relational familiarity is key to person-centred palliative care, fostering trust and continuity. However, it can blur boundaries, create emotional strain and contribute to inequities compounded by systemic challenges. Interdisciplinary collaboration and flexible care models are needed to adapt to patient needs and ensure equitable access. Future research should examine the impact of relational familiarity and the role of systemic reforms to enhance palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"20 ","pages":"26323524261426398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12953955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524261426398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An ageing population has increased the need for home-based palliative care. General practitioners (GPs) are central to continuity of care, yet time pressure and organisational constraints can challenge person-centred practice grounded in relational familiarity with patients and families.

Objectives: This study aims to explore how GPs navigate the relational familiarity in home-based palliative care and whether it functions as a basis or a bias for individualised care.

Design and methods: A secondary hermeneutic analysis was conducted, utilising data from two qualitative studies involving 21 GPs. These datasets focused on dignity-preserving care and shared decision making in palliative contexts. The hermeneutic circle was applied in an iterative process to interpret the in-depth interviews and focus group discussions.

Study design: A qualitative, explorative, and descriptive design grounded in hermeneutic methodology.

Results: Two overarching themes emerged: (1) Relational familiarity: A cornerstone of complex dimensions, where familiarity enabled trust, continuity and tailored care; however, it also created overfamiliarity that narrows perspective, blurs boundaries and burdens GPs. (2) Variability in engagement and follow-up, which reflected differences in individual GPs' interests, systemic constraints and the involvement of other healthcare professionals. While relational familiarity facilitated person-centred care, it was unevenly distributed, creating disparities in the quality of care.

Conclusion: Relational familiarity is key to person-centred palliative care, fostering trust and continuity. However, it can blur boundaries, create emotional strain and contribute to inequities compounded by systemic challenges. Interdisciplinary collaboration and flexible care models are needed to adapt to patient needs and ensure equitable access. Future research should examine the impact of relational familiarity and the role of systemic reforms to enhance palliative care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

全科医生对姑息期住家病人的关系熟悉度:个体化护理的基础或偏见。
背景:人口老龄化增加了对家庭姑息治疗的需求。全科医生(全科医生)是连续性护理的核心,但时间压力和组织限制可能会挑战以人为本的实践,这些实践以熟悉患者和家庭的关系为基础。目的:本研究旨在探讨全科医生如何在以家庭为基础的姑息治疗中导航关系熟悉度,以及它是否作为个性化护理的基础或偏见。设计和方法:进行二次解释学分析,利用涉及21名gp的两项定性研究的数据。这些数据集侧重于姑息环境下的尊严保护护理和共同决策。在一个迭代的过程中,运用解释学循环来解释深度访谈和焦点小组讨论。研究设计:基于解释学方法论的定性、探索性和描述性设计。研究结果表明:(1)关系熟悉度:复杂维度的基石,熟悉度可以实现信任、连续性和量身定制的护理;然而,它也造成了过度熟悉,缩小了视野,模糊了界限,给全科医生带来了负担。(2)参与和随访的可变性,反映了全科医生个人兴趣、系统约束和其他医疗专业人员参与的差异。虽然关系熟悉促进了以人为本的护理,但它分布不均,造成护理质量的差异。结论:关系熟悉度是以人为本的姑息治疗的关键,可以促进信任和连续性。然而,它会模糊界限,造成情绪紧张,导致不平等,并加剧系统性挑战。需要跨学科合作和灵活的护理模式来适应患者的需求并确保公平获取。未来的研究应检查关系熟悉度的影响和系统改革的作用,以加强姑息治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书