Cognitive impairment in cervical dystonia: core clinical feature or secondary effect related to non-motor symptoms?

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.5603/pjnns.108986
Małgorzata Dudzic, Anna Pieczyńska, Artur Drużdż, Anna Rajewska, Piotr Dudzic, Katarzyna Hojan
{"title":"Cognitive impairment in cervical dystonia: core clinical feature or secondary effect related to non-motor symptoms?","authors":"Małgorzata Dudzic, Anna Pieczyńska, Artur Drużdż, Anna Rajewska, Piotr Dudzic, Katarzyna Hojan","doi":"10.5603/pjnns.108986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>To investigate subtle cognitive dysfunction in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) as a potential independent non-motor feature of the disease or as a consequence of interactions between motor and other non-motor symptoms (NMS).</p><p><strong>Clinical rationale for the study: </strong>Cognitive impairment represents one of the most common non-motor symptoms in patients with cervical dystonia. However, the interrelations between cognitive dysfunction, motor symptoms, and other non-motor symptoms remain insufficiently explored.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with CD (n = 34) underwent comprehensive assessment at baseline and 4-6 weeks after botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatment. Clinical and sociodemographic variables, as well as motor and non-motor symptoms of dystonia were assessed. Matched controls (n = 33) underwent a single assessment. Cognitive function, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and sleep disturbances were assessed by a neuropsychologist in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 52.9% of patients with CD scored below the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cut-off for cognitive impairment, compared with 3.0% of healthy controls. Patients also showed higher rates of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. Cognitive performance was significantly lower in the CD group across multiple domains [executive functions, visuospatial abilities, language, memory, and attention (p < 0.05)]. Following botulinum toxin treatment, significant improvements were observed in overall MoCA scores and in specific domains of executive function, visuospatial abilities, language, and memory (p < 0.05). No correlation was found between overall dystonia severity and cognitive performance, although executive function correlated with motor symptom severity at baseline (R = -0.41, p = 0.017). In the multivariate model, sleep disturbances were identified as the strongest negative predictor of cognitive function (β = -0.40, p = 0.006), while higher education showed a protective effect. Other variables, including depression, anxiety, age, disease duration, and dystonia severity, were not significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The study explores cognitive impairment in cervical dystonia in relation to motor severity and non-motor domains, with the multivariable model suggesting a potential role of sleep disturbances. The findings do not allow a definitive distinction between cognitive impairment as a core feature of dystonia or a secondary effect related to non-motor symptoms, but they indicate complex and interdependent mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19132,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska","volume":" ","pages":"320-328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/pjnns.108986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the study: To investigate subtle cognitive dysfunction in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) as a potential independent non-motor feature of the disease or as a consequence of interactions between motor and other non-motor symptoms (NMS).

Clinical rationale for the study: Cognitive impairment represents one of the most common non-motor symptoms in patients with cervical dystonia. However, the interrelations between cognitive dysfunction, motor symptoms, and other non-motor symptoms remain insufficiently explored.

Material and methods: Patients with CD (n = 34) underwent comprehensive assessment at baseline and 4-6 weeks after botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatment. Clinical and sociodemographic variables, as well as motor and non-motor symptoms of dystonia were assessed. Matched controls (n = 33) underwent a single assessment. Cognitive function, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and sleep disturbances were assessed by a neuropsychologist in both groups.

Results: At baseline, 52.9% of patients with CD scored below the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cut-off for cognitive impairment, compared with 3.0% of healthy controls. Patients also showed higher rates of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. Cognitive performance was significantly lower in the CD group across multiple domains [executive functions, visuospatial abilities, language, memory, and attention (p < 0.05)]. Following botulinum toxin treatment, significant improvements were observed in overall MoCA scores and in specific domains of executive function, visuospatial abilities, language, and memory (p < 0.05). No correlation was found between overall dystonia severity and cognitive performance, although executive function correlated with motor symptom severity at baseline (R = -0.41, p = 0.017). In the multivariate model, sleep disturbances were identified as the strongest negative predictor of cognitive function (β = -0.40, p = 0.006), while higher education showed a protective effect. Other variables, including depression, anxiety, age, disease duration, and dystonia severity, were not significant predictors.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The study explores cognitive impairment in cervical dystonia in relation to motor severity and non-motor domains, with the multivariable model suggesting a potential role of sleep disturbances. The findings do not allow a definitive distinction between cognitive impairment as a core feature of dystonia or a secondary effect related to non-motor symptoms, but they indicate complex and interdependent mechanisms.

颈肌张力障碍的认知障碍:核心临床特征还是与非运动症状相关的继发效应?
研究目的:探讨颈肌张力障碍(CD)患者的细微认知功能障碍,作为该疾病潜在的独立非运动特征,或作为运动和其他非运动症状(NMS)相互作用的结果。研究的临床依据:认知障碍是颈肌张力障碍患者最常见的非运动症状之一。然而,认知功能障碍、运动症状和其他非运动症状之间的相互关系仍未得到充分探讨。材料和方法:在基线和肉毒杆菌毒素(BoNT)治疗后4-6周对34例CD患者进行综合评估。评估临床和社会人口学变量,以及肌张力障碍的运动和非运动症状。配对对照(n = 33)进行单一评估。两组的认知功能、抑郁和焦虑症状以及睡眠障碍由神经心理学家进行评估。结果:在基线时,52.9%的CD患者得分低于蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的认知障碍分界点,而健康对照组的这一比例为3.0%。患者还表现出更高的抑郁症状、焦虑和睡眠障碍。CD组在多个领域(执行功能、视觉空间能力、语言、记忆和注意力)的认知表现显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。肉毒杆菌毒素治疗后,MoCA总分和执行功能、视觉空间能力、语言和记忆的特定领域均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。整体肌张力障碍严重程度与认知表现之间没有相关性,尽管执行功能与基线时运动症状严重程度相关(R = -0.41, p = 0.017)。在多变量模型中,睡眠障碍被确定为认知功能最强的负面预测因子(β = -0.40, p = 0.006),而高等教育则显示出保护作用。其他变量,包括抑郁、焦虑、年龄、疾病持续时间和肌张力障碍严重程度,都不是显著的预测因子。结论和临床意义:该研究探讨了颈肌张力障碍的认知障碍与运动严重程度和非运动域的关系,多变量模型表明睡眠障碍可能起作用。这些发现并不能明确区分认知障碍是肌张力障碍的核心特征还是与非运动症状相关的继发效应,但它们表明了复杂且相互依赖的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
27.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery is an official journal of the Polish Society of Neurology and the Polish Society of Neurosurgeons, aimed at publishing high quality articles within the field of clinical neurology and neurosurgery, as well as related subspecialties. For more than a century, the journal has been providing its authors and readers with the opportunity to report, discuss, and share the issues important for every-day practice and research advances in the fields related to neurology and neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书